Cargando…
The limits of human predictions of recidivism
Dressel and Farid recently found that laypeople were as accurate as statistical algorithms in predicting whether a defendant would reoffend, casting doubt on the value of risk assessment tools in the criminal justice system. We report the results of a replication and extension of Dressel and Farid’s...
Autores principales: | Lin, Zhiyuan “Jerry”, Jung, Jongbin, Goel, Sharad, Skeem, Jennifer |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021503/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110737 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aaz0652 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism
por: Dressel, Julia, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Relationship influences for probationers with mental disorder
por: Skeem, Jennifer
Publicado: (2007) -
The predictive value of neurobiological measures for recidivism in delinquent male young adults
por: Zijlmans, Josjan, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Recidivism at the puerto rico trauma hospital
por: Suárez-Cruz, Adriana, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Age of gray matters: Neuroprediction of recidivism
por: Kiehl, Kent A., et al.
Publicado: (2018)