Cargando…

Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase1-1607 1G>2G Polymorphism and Lung Cancer Risk: An Update by Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE: The association between matrix metalloproteinase1 (MMP1)-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk is still inconclusive and inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the potential relationship between MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk. METHODS: The c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Yue, Yang, Xi, Xie, Yu-Ping, Yi, Cheng, Zhao, Fen, Huang, Ying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021599/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244308
http://dx.doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1841
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The association between matrix metalloproteinase1 (MMP1)-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk is still inconclusive and inconsistent. We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the potential relationship between MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism and lung cancer risk. METHODS: The comprehensive searches of the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, CBM, CNKI, Weipu, and Wanfang databases, published up to Nov 10, 2018. Statistical analyses were performed with Review Manager 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 14 relevant studies containing 6068 cases and 5860 controls were included in the study. The results indicated that MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism was significantly associated with increased lung cancer risk under four models: 2G vs. 1G model (pooled OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.05-1.34, P < 0.0001); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.09-1.64, P = 0.003); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G+1G/2G (pooled OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.06-1.49, P < 0.0001); 2G/2G+1G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.05-1.40, P = 0.01). Subgroup analyses showed that there was a higher increase in smoking status under three models: 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.14-3.77, P = 0.02); 2G/2G vs. 1G/1G+1G/2G (pooled OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.17-2.52, P = 0.006); 2G/2G+1G/2G vs. 1G/1G (pooled OR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.14-3.62, P = 0.02). In addition, subgroup analyses by ethnicity further identified the significant association in Asians. Non-smoking population and ethnicity among Caucasian had no relationship with lung cancer susceptibility in four models. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that MMP1-1607 1G>2G polymorphism was a risk factor for developing lung cancer risk.