Cargando…

Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis

There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive liter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Hui, Chen, Xinyi, Wang, Hanle, Fang, Zhi, Yao, Ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1
_version_ 1783497921741717504
author Chen, Hui
Chen, Xinyi
Wang, Hanle
Fang, Zhi
Yao, Ke
author_facet Chen, Hui
Chen, Xinyi
Wang, Hanle
Fang, Zhi
Yao, Ke
author_sort Chen, Hui
collection PubMed
description There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted to identify comparative cohort studies and case series comparing different formulas: Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, SRK/T, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q. Seven cohort studies and three observational studies including 260 eyes were identified. There were significant differences when Hoffer Q formula compared with SRK/T, Holladay 1. Holladay 1 formula produced less prediction error than SRK/T formula in double-K method. Hoffer Q formula performed best among SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas in total and single-K method. In eyes with previous data, it is recommended to choose double-K formula except SRK/T formula. In eyes with no previous data, Haigis-L formula is recommended if available, if the fourth formula is unavailable, single-k Hoffer Q is a good choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7021678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70216782020-02-24 Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Hui Chen, Xinyi Wang, Hanle Fang, Zhi Yao, Ke Sci Rep Article There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted to identify comparative cohort studies and case series comparing different formulas: Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, SRK/T, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q. Seven cohort studies and three observational studies including 260 eyes were identified. There were significant differences when Hoffer Q formula compared with SRK/T, Holladay 1. Holladay 1 formula produced less prediction error than SRK/T formula in double-K method. Hoffer Q formula performed best among SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas in total and single-K method. In eyes with previous data, it is recommended to choose double-K formula except SRK/T formula. In eyes with no previous data, Haigis-L formula is recommended if available, if the fourth formula is unavailable, single-k Hoffer Q is a good choice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7021678/ /pubmed/32060303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Hui
Chen, Xinyi
Wang, Hanle
Fang, Zhi
Yao, Ke
Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: a meta-analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhui intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis
AT chenxinyi intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis
AT wanghanle intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis
AT fangzhi intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis
AT yaoke intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis