Cargando…
Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis
There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive liter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1 |
_version_ | 1783497921741717504 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Hui Chen, Xinyi Wang, Hanle Fang, Zhi Yao, Ke |
author_facet | Chen, Hui Chen, Xinyi Wang, Hanle Fang, Zhi Yao, Ke |
author_sort | Chen, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted to identify comparative cohort studies and case series comparing different formulas: Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, SRK/T, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q. Seven cohort studies and three observational studies including 260 eyes were identified. There were significant differences when Hoffer Q formula compared with SRK/T, Holladay 1. Holladay 1 formula produced less prediction error than SRK/T formula in double-K method. Hoffer Q formula performed best among SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas in total and single-K method. In eyes with previous data, it is recommended to choose double-K formula except SRK/T formula. In eyes with no previous data, Haigis-L formula is recommended if available, if the fourth formula is unavailable, single-k Hoffer Q is a good choice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7021678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70216782020-02-24 Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis Chen, Hui Chen, Xinyi Wang, Hanle Fang, Zhi Yao, Ke Sci Rep Article There are an increasing number of people who have had refractive surgery now developing cataract. To compare the accuracy of different intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas after laser refractive surgery (photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis), a comprehensive literature search of PubMed and EMBASE was conducted to identify comparative cohort studies and case series comparing different formulas: Haigis-L, Shammas-PL, SRK/T, Holladay 1 and Hoffer Q. Seven cohort studies and three observational studies including 260 eyes were identified. There were significant differences when Hoffer Q formula compared with SRK/T, Holladay 1. Holladay 1 formula produced less prediction error than SRK/T formula in double-K method. Hoffer Q formula performed best among SRK/T and Holladay 1 formulas in total and single-K method. In eyes with previous data, it is recommended to choose double-K formula except SRK/T formula. In eyes with no previous data, Haigis-L formula is recommended if available, if the fourth formula is unavailable, single-k Hoffer Q is a good choice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7021678/ /pubmed/32060303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Hui Chen, Xinyi Wang, Hanle Fang, Zhi Yao, Ke Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Intraocular Lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | intraocular lens power calculation after laser refractive surgery: a meta-analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7021678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32060303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59487-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhui intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis AT chenxinyi intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis AT wanghanle intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis AT fangzhi intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis AT yaoke intraocularlenspowercalculationafterlaserrefractivesurgeryametaanalysis |