Cargando…

Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?

BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by cu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Vries, Elma, Kathard, Harsha, Müller, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6
_version_ 1783498318531264512
author de Vries, Elma
Kathard, Harsha
Müller, Alex
author_facet de Vries, Elma
Kathard, Harsha
Müller, Alex
author_sort de Vries, Elma
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by current curricula to provide appropriate healthcare to trans and gender diverse people. This strongly implies that health care students would benefit from curricula which facilitate learning about gender-affirming health care. MAIN BODY: Trans and gender diverse people have been pathologized by the medical profession, through classifications of mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). Although this is changing in the new ICD-11, tension remains between depathologization discourses and access to gender-affirming health care. Trans and gender diverse people experience significant health disparities and an increased burden of disease, specifically in the areas of mental health, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence and victimisation. Many of these health disparities originate from discrimination and systemic biases that decrease access to care, as well as from health professional ignorance. This paper will outline gaps in health science curricula that have been described in different contexts, and specific educational interventions that have attempted to improve awareness, knowledge and skills related to gender-affirming health care. The education of primary care providers is critical, as in much of the world, specialist services for gender-affirming health care are not widely available. The ethics of the gatekeeping model, where service providers decide who can access care, will be discussed and contrasted with the informed-consent model that upholds autonomy by empowering patients to make their own health care decisions. CONCLUSION: There is an ethical imperative for health professionals to reduce health care disparities of trans and gender diverse people and practice within the health care values of social justice and cultural humility. As health science educators, we have an ethical duty to include gender-affirming health in health science curricula in order to prevent harm to the trans and gender diverse patients that our students will provide care for in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7023748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70237482020-02-20 Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? de Vries, Elma Kathard, Harsha Müller, Alex BMC Med Educ Debate BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by current curricula to provide appropriate healthcare to trans and gender diverse people. This strongly implies that health care students would benefit from curricula which facilitate learning about gender-affirming health care. MAIN BODY: Trans and gender diverse people have been pathologized by the medical profession, through classifications of mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). Although this is changing in the new ICD-11, tension remains between depathologization discourses and access to gender-affirming health care. Trans and gender diverse people experience significant health disparities and an increased burden of disease, specifically in the areas of mental health, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence and victimisation. Many of these health disparities originate from discrimination and systemic biases that decrease access to care, as well as from health professional ignorance. This paper will outline gaps in health science curricula that have been described in different contexts, and specific educational interventions that have attempted to improve awareness, knowledge and skills related to gender-affirming health care. The education of primary care providers is critical, as in much of the world, specialist services for gender-affirming health care are not widely available. The ethics of the gatekeeping model, where service providers decide who can access care, will be discussed and contrasted with the informed-consent model that upholds autonomy by empowering patients to make their own health care decisions. CONCLUSION: There is an ethical imperative for health professionals to reduce health care disparities of trans and gender diverse people and practice within the health care values of social justice and cultural humility. As health science educators, we have an ethical duty to include gender-affirming health in health science curricula in order to prevent harm to the trans and gender diverse patients that our students will provide care for in the future. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7023748/ /pubmed/32059721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
de Vries, Elma
Kathard, Harsha
Müller, Alex
Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title_full Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title_fullStr Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title_full_unstemmed Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title_short Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
title_sort debate: why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6
work_keys_str_mv AT devrieselma debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula
AT kathardharsha debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula
AT mulleralex debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula