Cargando…
Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula?
BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by cu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6 |
_version_ | 1783498318531264512 |
---|---|
author | de Vries, Elma Kathard, Harsha Müller, Alex |
author_facet | de Vries, Elma Kathard, Harsha Müller, Alex |
author_sort | de Vries, Elma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by current curricula to provide appropriate healthcare to trans and gender diverse people. This strongly implies that health care students would benefit from curricula which facilitate learning about gender-affirming health care. MAIN BODY: Trans and gender diverse people have been pathologized by the medical profession, through classifications of mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). Although this is changing in the new ICD-11, tension remains between depathologization discourses and access to gender-affirming health care. Trans and gender diverse people experience significant health disparities and an increased burden of disease, specifically in the areas of mental health, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence and victimisation. Many of these health disparities originate from discrimination and systemic biases that decrease access to care, as well as from health professional ignorance. This paper will outline gaps in health science curricula that have been described in different contexts, and specific educational interventions that have attempted to improve awareness, knowledge and skills related to gender-affirming health care. The education of primary care providers is critical, as in much of the world, specialist services for gender-affirming health care are not widely available. The ethics of the gatekeeping model, where service providers decide who can access care, will be discussed and contrasted with the informed-consent model that upholds autonomy by empowering patients to make their own health care decisions. CONCLUSION: There is an ethical imperative for health professionals to reduce health care disparities of trans and gender diverse people and practice within the health care values of social justice and cultural humility. As health science educators, we have an ethical duty to include gender-affirming health in health science curricula in order to prevent harm to the trans and gender diverse patients that our students will provide care for in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7023748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70237482020-02-20 Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? de Vries, Elma Kathard, Harsha Müller, Alex BMC Med Educ Debate BACKGROUND: Every person who seeks health care should be affirmed, respected, understood, and not judged. However, trans and gender diverse people have experienced significant marginalization and discrimination in health care settings. Health professionals are generally not adequately prepared by current curricula to provide appropriate healthcare to trans and gender diverse people. This strongly implies that health care students would benefit from curricula which facilitate learning about gender-affirming health care. MAIN BODY: Trans and gender diverse people have been pathologized by the medical profession, through classifications of mental illness in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Disease (ICD). Although this is changing in the new ICD-11, tension remains between depathologization discourses and access to gender-affirming health care. Trans and gender diverse people experience significant health disparities and an increased burden of disease, specifically in the areas of mental health, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, violence and victimisation. Many of these health disparities originate from discrimination and systemic biases that decrease access to care, as well as from health professional ignorance. This paper will outline gaps in health science curricula that have been described in different contexts, and specific educational interventions that have attempted to improve awareness, knowledge and skills related to gender-affirming health care. The education of primary care providers is critical, as in much of the world, specialist services for gender-affirming health care are not widely available. The ethics of the gatekeeping model, where service providers decide who can access care, will be discussed and contrasted with the informed-consent model that upholds autonomy by empowering patients to make their own health care decisions. CONCLUSION: There is an ethical imperative for health professionals to reduce health care disparities of trans and gender diverse people and practice within the health care values of social justice and cultural humility. As health science educators, we have an ethical duty to include gender-affirming health in health science curricula in order to prevent harm to the trans and gender diverse patients that our students will provide care for in the future. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7023748/ /pubmed/32059721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Debate de Vries, Elma Kathard, Harsha Müller, Alex Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title | Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title_full | Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title_fullStr | Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title_short | Debate: Why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
title_sort | debate: why should gender-affirming health care be included in health science curricula? |
topic | Debate |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-1963-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devrieselma debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula AT kathardharsha debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula AT mulleralex debatewhyshouldgenderaffirminghealthcarebeincludedinhealthsciencecurricula |