Cargando…
An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest
BACKGROUND: An impedance threshold device (ITD) was developed to increase venous return to the heart and therefore increase cardiac output and organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary rescue (CPR). Basic CPR aims to maintain coronary and cerebral blood flow at the minimum level necessary for survival...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02264-5 |
_version_ | 1783498323841253376 |
---|---|
author | Kjaergaard, Benedict Holdgaard, Hans O. Magnusdottir, Sigridur O. Lundbye-Christensen, Søren Christensen, Erika F. |
author_facet | Kjaergaard, Benedict Holdgaard, Hans O. Magnusdottir, Sigridur O. Lundbye-Christensen, Søren Christensen, Erika F. |
author_sort | Kjaergaard, Benedict |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An impedance threshold device (ITD) was developed to increase venous return to the heart and therefore increase cardiac output and organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary rescue (CPR). Basic CPR aims to maintain coronary and cerebral blood flow at the minimum level necessary for survival. The present study compared the effects of an ITD on cerebral blood flow assessed as blood flow in both carotid arteries to the blood flow of a control group during prolonged CPR. METHODS: Fourteen anaesthetized pigs were monitored during 60 min of CPR after induced ventricular fibrillation. The primary outcome was blood flow in both carotid arteries, and the secondary outcomes were blood pressure, acid–base parameters, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate. The pigs were randomized to mechanical compressions and ventilation with an ITD added to the ventilation or to a control group treated only with mechanical compressions and ventilation. The time course for the parameters was tested using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The cumulative carotid blood flow in the ITD group decreased from 64 to 42 ml/min, and it decreased from 69 to 51 ml/min in the control group during 60 min of CPR. The difference was not significant. The secondary outcome measures were also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any beneficial effect of an ITD on carotid blood flow. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7023771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70237712020-02-20 An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest Kjaergaard, Benedict Holdgaard, Hans O. Magnusdottir, Sigridur O. Lundbye-Christensen, Søren Christensen, Erika F. J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: An impedance threshold device (ITD) was developed to increase venous return to the heart and therefore increase cardiac output and organ blood flow during cardiopulmonary rescue (CPR). Basic CPR aims to maintain coronary and cerebral blood flow at the minimum level necessary for survival. The present study compared the effects of an ITD on cerebral blood flow assessed as blood flow in both carotid arteries to the blood flow of a control group during prolonged CPR. METHODS: Fourteen anaesthetized pigs were monitored during 60 min of CPR after induced ventricular fibrillation. The primary outcome was blood flow in both carotid arteries, and the secondary outcomes were blood pressure, acid–base parameters, plasma potassium, and plasma lactate. The pigs were randomized to mechanical compressions and ventilation with an ITD added to the ventilation or to a control group treated only with mechanical compressions and ventilation. The time course for the parameters was tested using analysis of variance. RESULTS: The cumulative carotid blood flow in the ITD group decreased from 64 to 42 ml/min, and it decreased from 69 to 51 ml/min in the control group during 60 min of CPR. The difference was not significant. The secondary outcome measures were also not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any beneficial effect of an ITD on carotid blood flow. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7023771/ /pubmed/32059732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02264-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kjaergaard, Benedict Holdgaard, Hans O. Magnusdottir, Sigridur O. Lundbye-Christensen, Søren Christensen, Erika F. An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title | An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title_full | An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title_fullStr | An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title_full_unstemmed | An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title_short | An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
title_sort | impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02264-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kjaergaardbenedict animpedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT holdgaardhanso animpedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT magnusdottirsigriduro animpedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT lundbyechristensensøren animpedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT christensenerikaf animpedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT kjaergaardbenedict impedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT holdgaardhanso impedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT magnusdottirsigriduro impedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT lundbyechristensensøren impedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest AT christensenerikaf impedancethresholddevicedidnotimprovecarotidbloodflowinaporcinemodelofprolongedcardiacarrest |