Cargando…
Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review
BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted solutions are changing surgical practice continuously. One of the most disruptive technologies among the computer-integrated surgical techniques is Augmented Reality (AR). While Augmented Reality is increasingly used in several medical specialties, its potential benefit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32061248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3110-2 |
_version_ | 1783498325945745408 |
---|---|
author | Jud, Lukas Fotouhi, Javad Andronic, Octavian Aichmair, Alexander Osgood, Greg Navab, Nassir Farshad, Mazda |
author_facet | Jud, Lukas Fotouhi, Javad Andronic, Octavian Aichmair, Alexander Osgood, Greg Navab, Nassir Farshad, Mazda |
author_sort | Jud, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted solutions are changing surgical practice continuously. One of the most disruptive technologies among the computer-integrated surgical techniques is Augmented Reality (AR). While Augmented Reality is increasingly used in several medical specialties, its potential benefit in orthopedic surgery is not yet clear. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the current state of knowledge and the applicability of AR in orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed to find the state of knowledge and applicability of AR in Orthopedic surgery. A systematic search of the following three databases was performed: “PubMed”, “Cochrane Library” and “Web of Science”. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items on Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and it has been published and registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). RESULTS: 31 studies and reports are included and classified into the following categories: Instrument / Implant Placement, Osteotomies, Tumor Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Training and Education. Quality assessment could be performed in 18 studies. Among the clinical studies, there were six case series with an average score of 90% and one case report, which scored 81% according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist (JBI CAC). The 11 cadaveric studies scored 81% according to the QUACS scale (Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies). CONCLUSION: This manuscript provides 1) a summary of the current state of knowledge and research of Augmented Reality in orthopedic surgery presented in the literature, and 2) a discussion by the authors presenting the key remarks required for seamless integration of Augmented Reality in the future surgical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019128569. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7023780 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70237802020-02-20 Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review Jud, Lukas Fotouhi, Javad Andronic, Octavian Aichmair, Alexander Osgood, Greg Navab, Nassir Farshad, Mazda BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted solutions are changing surgical practice continuously. One of the most disruptive technologies among the computer-integrated surgical techniques is Augmented Reality (AR). While Augmented Reality is increasingly used in several medical specialties, its potential benefit in orthopedic surgery is not yet clear. The purpose of this article is to provide a systematic review of the current state of knowledge and the applicability of AR in orthopedic surgery. METHODS: A systematic review of the current literature was performed to find the state of knowledge and applicability of AR in Orthopedic surgery. A systematic search of the following three databases was performed: “PubMed”, “Cochrane Library” and “Web of Science”. The systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items on Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and it has been published and registered in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). RESULTS: 31 studies and reports are included and classified into the following categories: Instrument / Implant Placement, Osteotomies, Tumor Surgery, Trauma, and Surgical Training and Education. Quality assessment could be performed in 18 studies. Among the clinical studies, there were six case series with an average score of 90% and one case report, which scored 81% according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist (JBI CAC). The 11 cadaveric studies scored 81% according to the QUACS scale (Quality Appraisal for Cadaveric Studies). CONCLUSION: This manuscript provides 1) a summary of the current state of knowledge and research of Augmented Reality in orthopedic surgery presented in the literature, and 2) a discussion by the authors presenting the key remarks required for seamless integration of Augmented Reality in the future surgical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019128569. BioMed Central 2020-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7023780/ /pubmed/32061248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3110-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jud, Lukas Fotouhi, Javad Andronic, Octavian Aichmair, Alexander Osgood, Greg Navab, Nassir Farshad, Mazda Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title | Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title_full | Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title_short | Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review |
title_sort | applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023780/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32061248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-3110-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT judlukas applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT fotouhijavad applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT andronicoctavian applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT aichmairalexander applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT osgoodgreg applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT navabnassir applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT farshadmazda applicabilityofaugmentedrealityinorthopedicsurgeryasystematicreview |