Cargando…
The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention defic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8 |
_version_ | 1783498329207865344 |
---|---|
author | Sinclair, Lesley McFadden, Margaret Tilbrook, Helen Mitchell, Alex Keding, Ada Watson, Judith Bauld, Linda Kee, Frank Torgerson, David Hewitt, Catherine McKell, Jennifer Hoddinott, Pat Harris, Fiona M. Uny, Isabelle Boyd, Kathleen McMeekin, Nicola Ussher, Michael Tappin, David M. |
author_facet | Sinclair, Lesley McFadden, Margaret Tilbrook, Helen Mitchell, Alex Keding, Ada Watson, Judith Bauld, Linda Kee, Frank Torgerson, David Hewitt, Catherine McKell, Jennifer Hoddinott, Pat Harris, Fiona M. Uny, Isabelle Boyd, Kathleen McMeekin, Nicola Ussher, Michael Tappin, David M. |
author_sort | Sinclair, Lesley |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? METHODS: The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? DISCUSSION: This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7023794 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70237942020-02-20 The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial Sinclair, Lesley McFadden, Margaret Tilbrook, Helen Mitchell, Alex Keding, Ada Watson, Judith Bauld, Linda Kee, Frank Torgerson, David Hewitt, Catherine McKell, Jennifer Hoddinott, Pat Harris, Fiona M. Uny, Isabelle Boyd, Kathleen McMeekin, Nicola Ussher, Michael Tappin, David M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? METHODS: The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? DISCUSSION: This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7023794/ /pubmed/32059684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Sinclair, Lesley McFadden, Margaret Tilbrook, Helen Mitchell, Alex Keding, Ada Watson, Judith Bauld, Linda Kee, Frank Torgerson, David Hewitt, Catherine McKell, Jennifer Hoddinott, Pat Harris, Fiona M. Uny, Isabelle Boyd, Kathleen McMeekin, Nicola Ussher, Michael Tappin, David M. The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title | The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (cpit): study protocol for a phase iii randomised controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023794/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sinclairlesley thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcfaddenmargaret thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tilbrookhelen thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mitchellalex thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kedingada thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watsonjudith thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bauldlinda thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT keefrank thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT torgersondavid thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hewittcatherine thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mckelljennifer thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hoddinottpat thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisfionam thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT unyisabelle thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT boydkathleen thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcmeekinnicola thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT usshermichael thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tappindavidm thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sinclairlesley smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcfaddenmargaret smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tilbrookhelen smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mitchellalex smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kedingada smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT watsonjudith smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bauldlinda smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT keefrank smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT torgersondavid smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hewittcatherine smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mckelljennifer smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hoddinottpat smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT harrisfionam smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT unyisabelle smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT boydkathleen smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT mcmeekinnicola smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT usshermichael smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tappindavidm smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial AT smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial |