Cargando…

The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention defic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sinclair, Lesley, McFadden, Margaret, Tilbrook, Helen, Mitchell, Alex, Keding, Ada, Watson, Judith, Bauld, Linda, Kee, Frank, Torgerson, David, Hewitt, Catherine, McKell, Jennifer, Hoddinott, Pat, Harris, Fiona M., Uny, Isabelle, Boyd, Kathleen, McMeekin, Nicola, Ussher, Michael, Tappin, David M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8
_version_ 1783498329207865344
author Sinclair, Lesley
McFadden, Margaret
Tilbrook, Helen
Mitchell, Alex
Keding, Ada
Watson, Judith
Bauld, Linda
Kee, Frank
Torgerson, David
Hewitt, Catherine
McKell, Jennifer
Hoddinott, Pat
Harris, Fiona M.
Uny, Isabelle
Boyd, Kathleen
McMeekin, Nicola
Ussher, Michael
Tappin, David M.
author_facet Sinclair, Lesley
McFadden, Margaret
Tilbrook, Helen
Mitchell, Alex
Keding, Ada
Watson, Judith
Bauld, Linda
Kee, Frank
Torgerson, David
Hewitt, Catherine
McKell, Jennifer
Hoddinott, Pat
Harris, Fiona M.
Uny, Isabelle
Boyd, Kathleen
McMeekin, Nicola
Ussher, Michael
Tappin, David M.
author_sort Sinclair, Lesley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? METHODS: The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? DISCUSSION: This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7023794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70237942020-02-20 The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial Sinclair, Lesley McFadden, Margaret Tilbrook, Helen Mitchell, Alex Keding, Ada Watson, Judith Bauld, Linda Kee, Frank Torgerson, David Hewitt, Catherine McKell, Jennifer Hoddinott, Pat Harris, Fiona M. Uny, Isabelle Boyd, Kathleen McMeekin, Nicola Ussher, Michael Tappin, David M. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Eighty per cent of UK women have at least one baby, making pregnancy an opportunity to help women stop smoking before their health is irreparably compromised. Smoking cessation during pregnancy helps protect infants from miscarriage, still birth, low birth weight, asthma, attention deficit disorder and adult cardiovascular disease. UK national guidelines highlight lack of evidence for effectiveness of financial incentives to help pregnant smokers quit. This includes a research recommendation: within a UK context, are incentives an acceptable, effective and cost-effective way to help pregnant women who smoke to quit? METHODS: The Cessation in Pregnancy Incentives Trial (CPIT) III is a pragmatic, 42-month, multi-centre, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled superiority trial of the effect on smoking status of adding to usual Stop Smoking Services (SSS) support, the offer of up to £400 of financial voucher incentives, compared with usual support alone, to quit smoking during pregnancy. Participants (n = 940) are pregnant smokers (age > 16 years, < 24 weeks pregnant, English speaking), who consent via telephone to take part and are willing to be followed-up in late pregnancy and 6 months after birth. The primary outcome is cotinine/anabasine-validated abstinence from smoking in late pregnancy. Secondary outcomes include engagement with SSS, quit rates at 4 weeks from agreed quit date and 6 months after birth, and birth weight. Outcomes will be analysed by intention to treat, and regression models will be used to compare treatment effects on outcomes. A meta-analysis will include data from the feasibility study in Glasgow. An economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness from a UK NHS perspective. Process evaluation using a case-study approach will identify opportunities to improve recruitment and learning for future implementation. Research questions include: what is the therapeutic efficacy of incentives; are incentives cost-effective; and what are the potential facilitators and barriers to implementing incentives in different parts of the UK? DISCUSSION: This phase III trial in Scotland, England and Northern Ireland follows a successful phase II trial in Glasgow, UK. The participating sites have diverse SSS that represent most cessation services in the UK and serve demographically varied populations. If found to be acceptable and cost-effective, this trial could demonstrate that financial incentives are effective and transferable to most UK SSS for pregnant women. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials, ISRCTN15236311. Registered on 9 October 2017. BioMed Central 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7023794/ /pubmed/32059684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Sinclair, Lesley
McFadden, Margaret
Tilbrook, Helen
Mitchell, Alex
Keding, Ada
Watson, Judith
Bauld, Linda
Kee, Frank
Torgerson, David
Hewitt, Catherine
McKell, Jennifer
Hoddinott, Pat
Harris, Fiona M.
Uny, Isabelle
Boyd, Kathleen
McMeekin, Nicola
Ussher, Michael
Tappin, David M.
The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title_full The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title_short The smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (CPIT): study protocol for a phase III randomised controlled trial
title_sort smoking cessation in pregnancy incentives trial (cpit): study protocol for a phase iii randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7023794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32059684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4042-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sinclairlesley thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcfaddenmargaret thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tilbrookhelen thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellalex thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kedingada thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watsonjudith thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bauldlinda thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keefrank thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT torgersondavid thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hewittcatherine thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mckelljennifer thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hoddinottpat thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisfionam thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT unyisabelle thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boydkathleen thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcmeekinnicola thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT usshermichael thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tappindavidm thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT thesmokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sinclairlesley smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcfaddenmargaret smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tilbrookhelen smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mitchellalex smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT kedingada smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT watsonjudith smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bauldlinda smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT keefrank smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT torgersondavid smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hewittcatherine smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mckelljennifer smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hoddinottpat smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT harrisfionam smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT unyisabelle smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT boydkathleen smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT mcmeekinnicola smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT usshermichael smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tappindavidm smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT smokingcessationinpregnancyincentivestrialcpitstudyprotocolforaphaseiiirandomisedcontrolledtrial