Cargando…

Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes

Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Antonopoulou, Georgia, Vayenas, Dimitrios, Lyberatos, Gerasimos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020296
_version_ 1783498392841748480
author Antonopoulou, Georgia
Vayenas, Dimitrios
Lyberatos, Gerasimos
author_facet Antonopoulou, Georgia
Vayenas, Dimitrios
Lyberatos, Gerasimos
author_sort Antonopoulou, Georgia
collection PubMed
description Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and liquid fractions obtained. In addition, the effect of each pretreatment on carbohydrate solubilization and lignocellulossic content fractionation (to cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) was also evaluated. The experimental results showed that the methane yield was enhanced with alkaline pretreatment and, the higher the NaOH concentration (20 g/100 gTotal Solids (TS)), the higher was the methane yield observed (427.07 L CH(4)/kg Volatile Solids (VS), which was almost 25.7% higher than the BMP of the untreated GL). Comparing the BMP obtained under the two options, i.e., that of the whole pretreatment slurry with the sum of the BMPs of both fractions, it was found that direct anaerobic digestion without separation of the pretreated biomass was favored, in almost all cases. A preliminary energy balance and economic assessment indicated that the process could be sustainable, leading to a positive net heat energy only when using a more concentrated pretreated slurry (i.e., 20% organic loading), or when applying NaOH pretreatment at a lower chemical loading.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7024254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70242542020-03-19 Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes Antonopoulou, Georgia Vayenas, Dimitrios Lyberatos, Gerasimos Molecules Article Various pretreatment methods, such as thermal, alkaline and acid, were applied on grass lawn (GL) waste and the effect of each pretreatment method on the Biochemical Methane Potential was evaluated for two options, namely using the whole slurry resulting from pretreatment or the separate solid and liquid fractions obtained. In addition, the effect of each pretreatment on carbohydrate solubilization and lignocellulossic content fractionation (to cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin) was also evaluated. The experimental results showed that the methane yield was enhanced with alkaline pretreatment and, the higher the NaOH concentration (20 g/100 gTotal Solids (TS)), the higher was the methane yield observed (427.07 L CH(4)/kg Volatile Solids (VS), which was almost 25.7% higher than the BMP of the untreated GL). Comparing the BMP obtained under the two options, i.e., that of the whole pretreatment slurry with the sum of the BMPs of both fractions, it was found that direct anaerobic digestion without separation of the pretreated biomass was favored, in almost all cases. A preliminary energy balance and economic assessment indicated that the process could be sustainable, leading to a positive net heat energy only when using a more concentrated pretreated slurry (i.e., 20% organic loading), or when applying NaOH pretreatment at a lower chemical loading. MDPI 2020-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7024254/ /pubmed/31940836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020296 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Antonopoulou, Georgia
Vayenas, Dimitrios
Lyberatos, Gerasimos
Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_full Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_fullStr Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_short Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes
title_sort biogas production from physicochemically pretreated grass lawn waste: comparison of different process schemes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7024254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31940836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25020296
work_keys_str_mv AT antonopoulougeorgia biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes
AT vayenasdimitrios biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes
AT lyberatosgerasimos biogasproductionfromphysicochemicallypretreatedgrasslawnwastecomparisonofdifferentprocessschemes