Cargando…
The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing pr...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5 |
_version_ | 1783498504975417344 |
---|---|
author | Pesut, Barbara Thorne, Sally Schiller, Catharine J. Greig, Madeleine Roussel, Josette |
author_facet | Pesut, Barbara Thorne, Sally Schiller, Catharine J. Greig, Madeleine Roussel, Josette |
author_sort | Pesut, Barbara |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand the implications of a legislated approach to assisted death for nurses’ experiences and nursing practice. METHODS: The study used a qualitative approach guided by Interpretive Description. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 registered nurses and nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and managed using qualitative analysis software. Analysis followed a procedure of data immersion, open coding, constant comparative analysis, and the construction of a thematic and interpretive account. RESULTS: Nurses in this study described great variability in how MAiD had been enacted in their work context and the practice supports available to guide their practice. The development of systems to support MAiD, or lack thereof, was largely driven by persons in influential leadership positions. Workplaces that supported a range of nurses’ moral responses to MAiD were most effective in supporting nurses’ well-being during this impactful change in practice. Participants cited the importance of teamwork in providing high quality MAiD-related care; although, many worked without the benefit of a team. Nursing work related to MAiD was highly complex, largely because of the need for patient-centered care in systems that were not always organized to support such care. In the absence of adequate practice supports, some nurses were choosing to limit their involvement in MAiD. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained in this study suggested that some workplace contexts still lack the necessary supports for nurses to confidently meet the precision required of a legislated approach to MAiD. Without accessible palliative care, sufficient providers, a supportive team, practice supports, and a context that allowed nurses to have a range of responses to MAiD, nurses felt they were legally and morally at risk. Nurses seeking to provide the compassionate care consistent with such a momentous moment in patients’ lives, without suitable supports, find themselves caught between the proverbial rock and hard place. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7025406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70254062020-02-24 The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death Pesut, Barbara Thorne, Sally Schiller, Catharine J. Greig, Madeleine Roussel, Josette BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand the implications of a legislated approach to assisted death for nurses’ experiences and nursing practice. METHODS: The study used a qualitative approach guided by Interpretive Description. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 registered nurses and nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and managed using qualitative analysis software. Analysis followed a procedure of data immersion, open coding, constant comparative analysis, and the construction of a thematic and interpretive account. RESULTS: Nurses in this study described great variability in how MAiD had been enacted in their work context and the practice supports available to guide their practice. The development of systems to support MAiD, or lack thereof, was largely driven by persons in influential leadership positions. Workplaces that supported a range of nurses’ moral responses to MAiD were most effective in supporting nurses’ well-being during this impactful change in practice. Participants cited the importance of teamwork in providing high quality MAiD-related care; although, many worked without the benefit of a team. Nursing work related to MAiD was highly complex, largely because of the need for patient-centered care in systems that were not always organized to support such care. In the absence of adequate practice supports, some nurses were choosing to limit their involvement in MAiD. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained in this study suggested that some workplace contexts still lack the necessary supports for nurses to confidently meet the precision required of a legislated approach to MAiD. Without accessible palliative care, sufficient providers, a supportive team, practice supports, and a context that allowed nurses to have a range of responses to MAiD, nurses felt they were legally and morally at risk. Nurses seeking to provide the compassionate care consistent with such a momentous moment in patients’ lives, without suitable supports, find themselves caught between the proverbial rock and hard place. BioMed Central 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7025406/ /pubmed/32095114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pesut, Barbara Thorne, Sally Schiller, Catharine J. Greig, Madeleine Roussel, Josette The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title | The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title_full | The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title_fullStr | The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title_full_unstemmed | The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title_short | The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
title_sort | rocks and hard places of maid: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pesutbarbara therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT thornesally therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT schillercatharinej therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT greigmadeleine therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT rousseljosette therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT pesutbarbara rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT thornesally rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT schillercatharinej rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT greigmadeleine rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath AT rousseljosette rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath |