Cargando…

The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death

BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pesut, Barbara, Thorne, Sally, Schiller, Catharine J., Greig, Madeleine, Roussel, Josette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5
_version_ 1783498504975417344
author Pesut, Barbara
Thorne, Sally
Schiller, Catharine J.
Greig, Madeleine
Roussel, Josette
author_facet Pesut, Barbara
Thorne, Sally
Schiller, Catharine J.
Greig, Madeleine
Roussel, Josette
author_sort Pesut, Barbara
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand the implications of a legislated approach to assisted death for nurses’ experiences and nursing practice. METHODS: The study used a qualitative approach guided by Interpretive Description. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 registered nurses and nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and managed using qualitative analysis software. Analysis followed a procedure of data immersion, open coding, constant comparative analysis, and the construction of a thematic and interpretive account. RESULTS: Nurses in this study described great variability in how MAiD had been enacted in their work context and the practice supports available to guide their practice. The development of systems to support MAiD, or lack thereof, was largely driven by persons in influential leadership positions. Workplaces that supported a range of nurses’ moral responses to MAiD were most effective in supporting nurses’ well-being during this impactful change in practice. Participants cited the importance of teamwork in providing high quality MAiD-related care; although, many worked without the benefit of a team. Nursing work related to MAiD was highly complex, largely because of the need for patient-centered care in systems that were not always organized to support such care. In the absence of adequate practice supports, some nurses were choosing to limit their involvement in MAiD. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained in this study suggested that some workplace contexts still lack the necessary supports for nurses to confidently meet the precision required of a legislated approach to MAiD. Without accessible palliative care, sufficient providers, a supportive team, practice supports, and a context that allowed nurses to have a range of responses to MAiD, nurses felt they were legally and morally at risk. Nurses seeking to provide the compassionate care consistent with such a momentous moment in patients’ lives, without suitable supports, find themselves caught between the proverbial rock and hard place.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7025406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70254062020-02-24 The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death Pesut, Barbara Thorne, Sally Schiller, Catharine J. Greig, Madeleine Roussel, Josette BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in June, 2016. The Canadian government’s decision to legislate assisted dying, an approach that requires a high degree of obligation, precision, and delegation, has resulted in unique challenges for health care and for nursing practice. The purpose of this study was to better understand the implications of a legislated approach to assisted death for nurses’ experiences and nursing practice. METHODS: The study used a qualitative approach guided by Interpretive Description. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 59 registered nurses and nurse practitioners. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and managed using qualitative analysis software. Analysis followed a procedure of data immersion, open coding, constant comparative analysis, and the construction of a thematic and interpretive account. RESULTS: Nurses in this study described great variability in how MAiD had been enacted in their work context and the practice supports available to guide their practice. The development of systems to support MAiD, or lack thereof, was largely driven by persons in influential leadership positions. Workplaces that supported a range of nurses’ moral responses to MAiD were most effective in supporting nurses’ well-being during this impactful change in practice. Participants cited the importance of teamwork in providing high quality MAiD-related care; although, many worked without the benefit of a team. Nursing work related to MAiD was highly complex, largely because of the need for patient-centered care in systems that were not always organized to support such care. In the absence of adequate practice supports, some nurses were choosing to limit their involvement in MAiD. CONCLUSIONS: Data obtained in this study suggested that some workplace contexts still lack the necessary supports for nurses to confidently meet the precision required of a legislated approach to MAiD. Without accessible palliative care, sufficient providers, a supportive team, practice supports, and a context that allowed nurses to have a range of responses to MAiD, nurses felt they were legally and morally at risk. Nurses seeking to provide the compassionate care consistent with such a momentous moment in patients’ lives, without suitable supports, find themselves caught between the proverbial rock and hard place. BioMed Central 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7025406/ /pubmed/32095114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pesut, Barbara
Thorne, Sally
Schiller, Catharine J.
Greig, Madeleine
Roussel, Josette
The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title_full The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title_fullStr The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title_full_unstemmed The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title_short The rocks and hard places of MAiD: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
title_sort rocks and hard places of maid: a qualitative study of nursing practice in the context of legislated assisted death
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32095114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0404-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pesutbarbara therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT thornesally therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT schillercatharinej therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT greigmadeleine therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT rousseljosette therocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT pesutbarbara rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT thornesally rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT schillercatharinej rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT greigmadeleine rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath
AT rousseljosette rocksandhardplacesofmaidaqualitativestudyofnursingpracticeinthecontextoflegislatedassisteddeath