Cargando…

Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations

Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human applicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aman, Martin, Bergmeister, Konstantin D., Festin, Christopher, Sporer, Matthias E., Russold, Michael Friedrich, Gstoettner, Clemens, Podesser, Bruno K., Gail, Alexander, Farina, Dario, Cederna, Paul, Aszmann, Oskar C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442
_version_ 1783498539593105408
author Aman, Martin
Bergmeister, Konstantin D.
Festin, Christopher
Sporer, Matthias E.
Russold, Michael Friedrich
Gstoettner, Clemens
Podesser, Bruno K.
Gail, Alexander
Farina, Dario
Cederna, Paul
Aszmann, Oskar C.
author_facet Aman, Martin
Bergmeister, Konstantin D.
Festin, Christopher
Sporer, Matthias E.
Russold, Michael Friedrich
Gstoettner, Clemens
Podesser, Bruno K.
Gail, Alexander
Farina, Dario
Cederna, Paul
Aszmann, Oskar C.
author_sort Aman, Martin
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human application, experimental preclinical testing is essential to assess chronic in-vivo biocompatibility and functionality. Here, we analyze available animal models, their costs and ethical challenges in special regards to simulating a potentially life-long application in a short period of time and in non-biped animals. Methods: We performed a literature analysis following the PRISMA guidelines including all animal models used to record neural or muscular activity via implantable electrodes, evaluating animal models, group size, duration, origin of publication as well as type of interface. Furthermore, behavioral, ethical, and economic considerations of these models were analyzed. Additionally, we discuss experience and surgical approaches with rat, sheep, and primate models and an approach for international standardized testing. Results: Overall, 343 studies matched the search terms, dominantly originating from the US (55%) and Europe (34%), using mainly small animal models (rat: 40%). Electrode placement was dominantly neural (77%) compared to muscular (23%). Large animal models had a mean duration of 135 ± 87.2 days, with a mean of 5.3 ± 3.4 animals per trial. Small animal models had a mean duration of 85 ± 11.2 days, with a mean of 12.4 ± 1.7 animals. Discussion: Only 37% animal models were by definition chronic tests (>3 months) and thus potentially provide information on long-term performance. Costs for large animals were up to 45 times higher than small animals. However, costs are relatively small compared to complication costs in human long-term applications. Overall, we believe a combination of small animals for preliminary primary electrode testing and large animals to investigate long-term biocompatibility, impedance, and tissue regeneration parameters provides sufficient data to ensure long-term human applications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7025572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70255722020-02-28 Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations Aman, Martin Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Russold, Michael Friedrich Gstoettner, Clemens Podesser, Bruno K. Gail, Alexander Farina, Dario Cederna, Paul Aszmann, Oskar C. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human application, experimental preclinical testing is essential to assess chronic in-vivo biocompatibility and functionality. Here, we analyze available animal models, their costs and ethical challenges in special regards to simulating a potentially life-long application in a short period of time and in non-biped animals. Methods: We performed a literature analysis following the PRISMA guidelines including all animal models used to record neural or muscular activity via implantable electrodes, evaluating animal models, group size, duration, origin of publication as well as type of interface. Furthermore, behavioral, ethical, and economic considerations of these models were analyzed. Additionally, we discuss experience and surgical approaches with rat, sheep, and primate models and an approach for international standardized testing. Results: Overall, 343 studies matched the search terms, dominantly originating from the US (55%) and Europe (34%), using mainly small animal models (rat: 40%). Electrode placement was dominantly neural (77%) compared to muscular (23%). Large animal models had a mean duration of 135 ± 87.2 days, with a mean of 5.3 ± 3.4 animals per trial. Small animal models had a mean duration of 85 ± 11.2 days, with a mean of 12.4 ± 1.7 animals. Discussion: Only 37% animal models were by definition chronic tests (>3 months) and thus potentially provide information on long-term performance. Costs for large animals were up to 45 times higher than small animals. However, costs are relatively small compared to complication costs in human long-term applications. Overall, we believe a combination of small animals for preliminary primary electrode testing and large animals to investigate long-term biocompatibility, impedance, and tissue regeneration parameters provides sufficient data to ensure long-term human applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7025572/ /pubmed/32116485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aman, Bergmeister, Festin, Sporer, Russold, Gstoettner, Podesser, Gail, Farina, Cederna and Aszmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Aman, Martin
Bergmeister, Konstantin D.
Festin, Christopher
Sporer, Matthias E.
Russold, Michael Friedrich
Gstoettner, Clemens
Podesser, Bruno K.
Gail, Alexander
Farina, Dario
Cederna, Paul
Aszmann, Oskar C.
Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title_full Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title_fullStr Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title_full_unstemmed Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title_short Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
title_sort experimental testing of bionic peripheral nerve and muscle interfaces: animal model considerations
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116485
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442
work_keys_str_mv AT amanmartin experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT bergmeisterkonstantind experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT festinchristopher experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT sporermatthiase experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT russoldmichaelfriedrich experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT gstoettnerclemens experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT podesserbrunok experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT gailalexander experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT farinadario experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT cedernapaul experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations
AT aszmannoskarc experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations