Cargando…
Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations
Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human applicat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442 |
_version_ | 1783498539593105408 |
---|---|
author | Aman, Martin Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Russold, Michael Friedrich Gstoettner, Clemens Podesser, Bruno K. Gail, Alexander Farina, Dario Cederna, Paul Aszmann, Oskar C. |
author_facet | Aman, Martin Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Russold, Michael Friedrich Gstoettner, Clemens Podesser, Bruno K. Gail, Alexander Farina, Dario Cederna, Paul Aszmann, Oskar C. |
author_sort | Aman, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human application, experimental preclinical testing is essential to assess chronic in-vivo biocompatibility and functionality. Here, we analyze available animal models, their costs and ethical challenges in special regards to simulating a potentially life-long application in a short period of time and in non-biped animals. Methods: We performed a literature analysis following the PRISMA guidelines including all animal models used to record neural or muscular activity via implantable electrodes, evaluating animal models, group size, duration, origin of publication as well as type of interface. Furthermore, behavioral, ethical, and economic considerations of these models were analyzed. Additionally, we discuss experience and surgical approaches with rat, sheep, and primate models and an approach for international standardized testing. Results: Overall, 343 studies matched the search terms, dominantly originating from the US (55%) and Europe (34%), using mainly small animal models (rat: 40%). Electrode placement was dominantly neural (77%) compared to muscular (23%). Large animal models had a mean duration of 135 ± 87.2 days, with a mean of 5.3 ± 3.4 animals per trial. Small animal models had a mean duration of 85 ± 11.2 days, with a mean of 12.4 ± 1.7 animals. Discussion: Only 37% animal models were by definition chronic tests (>3 months) and thus potentially provide information on long-term performance. Costs for large animals were up to 45 times higher than small animals. However, costs are relatively small compared to complication costs in human long-term applications. Overall, we believe a combination of small animals for preliminary primary electrode testing and large animals to investigate long-term biocompatibility, impedance, and tissue regeneration parameters provides sufficient data to ensure long-term human applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7025572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70255722020-02-28 Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations Aman, Martin Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Russold, Michael Friedrich Gstoettner, Clemens Podesser, Bruno K. Gail, Alexander Farina, Dario Cederna, Paul Aszmann, Oskar C. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Introduction: Man-machine interfacing remains the main challenge for accurate and reliable control of bionic prostheses. Implantable electrodes in nerves and muscles may overcome some of the limitations by significantly increasing the interface's reliability and bandwidth. Before human application, experimental preclinical testing is essential to assess chronic in-vivo biocompatibility and functionality. Here, we analyze available animal models, their costs and ethical challenges in special regards to simulating a potentially life-long application in a short period of time and in non-biped animals. Methods: We performed a literature analysis following the PRISMA guidelines including all animal models used to record neural or muscular activity via implantable electrodes, evaluating animal models, group size, duration, origin of publication as well as type of interface. Furthermore, behavioral, ethical, and economic considerations of these models were analyzed. Additionally, we discuss experience and surgical approaches with rat, sheep, and primate models and an approach for international standardized testing. Results: Overall, 343 studies matched the search terms, dominantly originating from the US (55%) and Europe (34%), using mainly small animal models (rat: 40%). Electrode placement was dominantly neural (77%) compared to muscular (23%). Large animal models had a mean duration of 135 ± 87.2 days, with a mean of 5.3 ± 3.4 animals per trial. Small animal models had a mean duration of 85 ± 11.2 days, with a mean of 12.4 ± 1.7 animals. Discussion: Only 37% animal models were by definition chronic tests (>3 months) and thus potentially provide information on long-term performance. Costs for large animals were up to 45 times higher than small animals. However, costs are relatively small compared to complication costs in human long-term applications. Overall, we believe a combination of small animals for preliminary primary electrode testing and large animals to investigate long-term biocompatibility, impedance, and tissue regeneration parameters provides sufficient data to ensure long-term human applications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7025572/ /pubmed/32116485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aman, Bergmeister, Festin, Sporer, Russold, Gstoettner, Podesser, Gail, Farina, Cederna and Aszmann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Aman, Martin Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Russold, Michael Friedrich Gstoettner, Clemens Podesser, Bruno K. Gail, Alexander Farina, Dario Cederna, Paul Aszmann, Oskar C. Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title | Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title_full | Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title_fullStr | Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title_short | Experimental Testing of Bionic Peripheral Nerve and Muscle Interfaces: Animal Model Considerations |
title_sort | experimental testing of bionic peripheral nerve and muscle interfaces: animal model considerations |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116485 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.01442 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amanmartin experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT bergmeisterkonstantind experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT festinchristopher experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT sporermatthiase experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT russoldmichaelfriedrich experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT gstoettnerclemens experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT podesserbrunok experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT gailalexander experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT farinadario experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT cedernapaul experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations AT aszmannoskarc experimentaltestingofbionicperipheralnerveandmuscleinterfacesanimalmodelconsiderations |