Cargando…
Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103888 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751 |
_version_ | 1783498547586400256 |
---|---|
author | Zapata, Miguel Angel Royo-Fibla, Dídac Font, Octavi Vela, José Ignacio Marcantonio, Ivanna Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham Garcia-Gasulla, Darío Cortés, Ulises Ayguadé, Eduard Labarta, Jesus |
author_facet | Zapata, Miguel Angel Royo-Fibla, Dídac Font, Octavi Vela, José Ignacio Marcantonio, Ivanna Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham Garcia-Gasulla, Darío Cortés, Ulises Ayguadé, Eduard Labarta, Jesus |
author_sort | Zapata, Miguel Angel |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD) and left eye (OS) retinal fundus images,(4) detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and (5) detection of referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five algorithms were designed. Retrospective study from a database of 306,302 images, Optretina’s tagged dataset. Three different ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, classified all images. The dataset was split per patient in a training (80%) and testing (20%) splits. Three different CNN architectures were employed, two of which were custom designed to minimize the number of parameters with minimal impact on its accuracy. Main outcome measure was area under the curve (AUC) with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Determination of retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.979 with an accuracy of 96% (sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 92.4%). Determination of good quality retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.947, accuracy 91.8% (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%). Algorithm for OD/OS had AUC 0.989, accuracy 97.4%. AMD had AUC of 0.936, accuracy 86.3% (sensitivity 90.2% specificity 82.5%), GON had AUC of 0.863, accuracy 80.2% (sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms can differentiate a retinal fundus image from other images. Algorithms can evaluate the quality of an image, discriminate between right or left eye and detect the presence of AMD and GON with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7025650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70256502020-02-26 Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma Zapata, Miguel Angel Royo-Fibla, Dídac Font, Octavi Vela, José Ignacio Marcantonio, Ivanna Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham Garcia-Gasulla, Darío Cortés, Ulises Ayguadé, Eduard Labarta, Jesus Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD) and left eye (OS) retinal fundus images,(4) detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and (5) detection of referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five algorithms were designed. Retrospective study from a database of 306,302 images, Optretina’s tagged dataset. Three different ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, classified all images. The dataset was split per patient in a training (80%) and testing (20%) splits. Three different CNN architectures were employed, two of which were custom designed to minimize the number of parameters with minimal impact on its accuracy. Main outcome measure was area under the curve (AUC) with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Determination of retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.979 with an accuracy of 96% (sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 92.4%). Determination of good quality retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.947, accuracy 91.8% (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%). Algorithm for OD/OS had AUC 0.989, accuracy 97.4%. AMD had AUC of 0.936, accuracy 86.3% (sensitivity 90.2% specificity 82.5%), GON had AUC of 0.863, accuracy 80.2% (sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms can differentiate a retinal fundus image from other images. Algorithms can evaluate the quality of an image, discriminate between right or left eye and detect the presence of AMD and GON with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Dove 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7025650/ /pubmed/32103888 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751 Text en © 2020 Zapata et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zapata, Miguel Angel Royo-Fibla, Dídac Font, Octavi Vela, José Ignacio Marcantonio, Ivanna Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham Garcia-Gasulla, Darío Cortés, Ulises Ayguadé, Eduard Labarta, Jesus Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title | Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title_full | Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title_short | Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma |
title_sort | artificial intelligence to identify retinal fundus images, quality validation, laterality evaluation, macular degeneration, and suspected glaucoma |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025650/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103888 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zapatamiguelangel artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT royofibladidac artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT fontoctavi artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT velajoseignacio artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT marcantonioivanna artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT moyasanchezeduardoulises artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT sanchezperezabraham artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT garciagasulladario artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT cortesulises artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT ayguadeeduard artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma AT labartajesus artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma |