Cargando…

Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma

PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zapata, Miguel Angel, Royo-Fibla, Dídac, Font, Octavi, Vela, José Ignacio, Marcantonio, Ivanna, Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises, Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham, Garcia-Gasulla, Darío, Cortés, Ulises, Ayguadé, Eduard, Labarta, Jesus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103888
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751
_version_ 1783498547586400256
author Zapata, Miguel Angel
Royo-Fibla, Dídac
Font, Octavi
Vela, José Ignacio
Marcantonio, Ivanna
Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises
Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham
Garcia-Gasulla, Darío
Cortés, Ulises
Ayguadé, Eduard
Labarta, Jesus
author_facet Zapata, Miguel Angel
Royo-Fibla, Dídac
Font, Octavi
Vela, José Ignacio
Marcantonio, Ivanna
Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises
Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham
Garcia-Gasulla, Darío
Cortés, Ulises
Ayguadé, Eduard
Labarta, Jesus
author_sort Zapata, Miguel Angel
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD) and left eye (OS) retinal fundus images,(4) detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and (5) detection of referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five algorithms were designed. Retrospective study from a database of 306,302 images, Optretina’s tagged dataset. Three different ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, classified all images. The dataset was split per patient in a training (80%) and testing (20%) splits. Three different CNN architectures were employed, two of which were custom designed to minimize the number of parameters with minimal impact on its accuracy. Main outcome measure was area under the curve (AUC) with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Determination of retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.979 with an accuracy of 96% (sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 92.4%). Determination of good quality retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.947, accuracy 91.8% (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%). Algorithm for OD/OS had AUC 0.989, accuracy 97.4%. AMD had AUC of 0.936, accuracy 86.3% (sensitivity 90.2% specificity 82.5%), GON had AUC of 0.863, accuracy 80.2% (sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms can differentiate a retinal fundus image from other images. Algorithms can evaluate the quality of an image, discriminate between right or left eye and detect the presence of AMD and GON with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7025650
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70256502020-02-26 Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma Zapata, Miguel Angel Royo-Fibla, Dídac Font, Octavi Vela, José Ignacio Marcantonio, Ivanna Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham Garcia-Gasulla, Darío Cortés, Ulises Ayguadé, Eduard Labarta, Jesus Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To assess the performance of deep learning algorithms for different tasks in retinal fundus images: (1) detection of retinal fundus images versus optical coherence tomography (OCT) or other images, (2) evaluation of good quality retinal fundus images, (3) distinction between right eye (OD) and left eye (OS) retinal fundus images,(4) detection of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and (5) detection of referable glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five algorithms were designed. Retrospective study from a database of 306,302 images, Optretina’s tagged dataset. Three different ophthalmologists, all retinal specialists, classified all images. The dataset was split per patient in a training (80%) and testing (20%) splits. Three different CNN architectures were employed, two of which were custom designed to minimize the number of parameters with minimal impact on its accuracy. Main outcome measure was area under the curve (AUC) with accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Determination of retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.979 with an accuracy of 96% (sensitivity 97.7%, specificity 92.4%). Determination of good quality retinal fundus image had AUC of 0.947, accuracy 91.8% (sensitivity 96.9%, specificity 81.8%). Algorithm for OD/OS had AUC 0.989, accuracy 97.4%. AMD had AUC of 0.936, accuracy 86.3% (sensitivity 90.2% specificity 82.5%), GON had AUC of 0.863, accuracy 80.2% (sensitivity 76.8%, specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSION: Deep learning algorithms can differentiate a retinal fundus image from other images. Algorithms can evaluate the quality of an image, discriminate between right or left eye and detect the presence of AMD and GON with a high level of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Dove 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7025650/ /pubmed/32103888 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751 Text en © 2020 Zapata et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zapata, Miguel Angel
Royo-Fibla, Dídac
Font, Octavi
Vela, José Ignacio
Marcantonio, Ivanna
Moya-Sánchez, Eduardo Ulises
Sánchez-Pérez, Abraham
Garcia-Gasulla, Darío
Cortés, Ulises
Ayguadé, Eduard
Labarta, Jesus
Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title_full Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title_fullStr Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title_short Artificial Intelligence to Identify Retinal Fundus Images, Quality Validation, Laterality Evaluation, Macular Degeneration, and Suspected Glaucoma
title_sort artificial intelligence to identify retinal fundus images, quality validation, laterality evaluation, macular degeneration, and suspected glaucoma
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025650/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103888
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S235751
work_keys_str_mv AT zapatamiguelangel artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT royofibladidac artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT fontoctavi artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT velajoseignacio artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT marcantonioivanna artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT moyasanchezeduardoulises artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT sanchezperezabraham artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT garciagasulladario artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT cortesulises artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT ayguadeeduard artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma
AT labartajesus artificialintelligencetoidentifyretinalfundusimagesqualityvalidationlateralityevaluationmaculardegenerationandsuspectedglaucoma