Cargando…
Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerg...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01 |
_version_ | 1783498572093718528 |
---|---|
author | Hamad, Judy McCloskey, Hannah Milowsky, Matthew I. Royce, Trevor Smith, Angela |
author_facet | Hamad, Judy McCloskey, Hannah Milowsky, Matthew I. Royce, Trevor Smith, Angela |
author_sort | Hamad, Judy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerged as alternatives treatment options that can provide comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining patients’ quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To review bladder preservation therapies, patient selection criteria, and functional and oncologic outcomes for BPT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of bladder preservation therapies in Pubmed and Embase. DISCUSSION: The ideal patient for BPT has low-volume T2 disease, absence of CIS, absence of hydronephrosis, and a maximal TURBT with regular surveillance. Technological advancements involving cancer staging, TURBT technique, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens have improved BPT outcomes, with oncologic outcomes now comparable to those of radical cystectomy. Advancements in BPT also includes a heightened focus on improving quality of life for patients undergoing bladder preservation. Preservation strategies with most evidence for use include trimodality therapy and partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the breadth of strategies that aim to preserve a patient’s bladder while still optimizing local tumor control and overall survival. Future areas for innovation include the use of predictive biomarkers and implementation of immunotherapy, moving the field towards patient-tailored care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7025842 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70258422020-08-03 Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review Hamad, Judy McCloskey, Hannah Milowsky, Matthew I. Royce, Trevor Smith, Angela Int Braz J Urol Review Article BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerged as alternatives treatment options that can provide comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining patients’ quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To review bladder preservation therapies, patient selection criteria, and functional and oncologic outcomes for BPT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of bladder preservation therapies in Pubmed and Embase. DISCUSSION: The ideal patient for BPT has low-volume T2 disease, absence of CIS, absence of hydronephrosis, and a maximal TURBT with regular surveillance. Technological advancements involving cancer staging, TURBT technique, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens have improved BPT outcomes, with oncologic outcomes now comparable to those of radical cystectomy. Advancements in BPT also includes a heightened focus on improving quality of life for patients undergoing bladder preservation. Preservation strategies with most evidence for use include trimodality therapy and partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the breadth of strategies that aim to preserve a patient’s bladder while still optimizing local tumor control and overall survival. Future areas for innovation include the use of predictive biomarkers and implementation of immunotherapy, moving the field towards patient-tailored care. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7025842/ /pubmed/31961624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Hamad, Judy McCloskey, Hannah Milowsky, Matthew I. Royce, Trevor Smith, Angela Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title | Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title_full | Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title_fullStr | Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title_full_unstemmed | Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title_short | Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
title_sort | bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025842/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamadjudy bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview AT mccloskeyhannah bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview AT milowskymatthewi bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview AT roycetrevor bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview AT smithangela bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview |