Cargando…

Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review

BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamad, Judy, McCloskey, Hannah, Milowsky, Matthew I., Royce, Trevor, Smith, Angela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01
_version_ 1783498572093718528
author Hamad, Judy
McCloskey, Hannah
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Royce, Trevor
Smith, Angela
author_facet Hamad, Judy
McCloskey, Hannah
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Royce, Trevor
Smith, Angela
author_sort Hamad, Judy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerged as alternatives treatment options that can provide comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining patients’ quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To review bladder preservation therapies, patient selection criteria, and functional and oncologic outcomes for BPT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of bladder preservation therapies in Pubmed and Embase. DISCUSSION: The ideal patient for BPT has low-volume T2 disease, absence of CIS, absence of hydronephrosis, and a maximal TURBT with regular surveillance. Technological advancements involving cancer staging, TURBT technique, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens have improved BPT outcomes, with oncologic outcomes now comparable to those of radical cystectomy. Advancements in BPT also includes a heightened focus on improving quality of life for patients undergoing bladder preservation. Preservation strategies with most evidence for use include trimodality therapy and partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the breadth of strategies that aim to preserve a patient’s bladder while still optimizing local tumor control and overall survival. Future areas for innovation include the use of predictive biomarkers and implementation of immunotherapy, moving the field towards patient-tailored care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7025842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70258422020-08-03 Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review Hamad, Judy McCloskey, Hannah Milowsky, Matthew I. Royce, Trevor Smith, Angela Int Braz J Urol Review Article BACKGROUND: Standard management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer involves radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. However, patients may be ineligible for surgery or may wish to avoid the morbidity of cystectomy due to quality of life concerns. Bladder preservation therapies have emerged as alternatives treatment options that can provide comparable oncologic outcomes while maintaining patients’ quality of life. OBJECTIVE: To review bladder preservation therapies, patient selection criteria, and functional and oncologic outcomes for BPT in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive literature review of bladder preservation therapies in Pubmed and Embase. DISCUSSION: The ideal patient for BPT has low-volume T2 disease, absence of CIS, absence of hydronephrosis, and a maximal TURBT with regular surveillance. Technological advancements involving cancer staging, TURBT technique, and chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimens have improved BPT outcomes, with oncologic outcomes now comparable to those of radical cystectomy. Advancements in BPT also includes a heightened focus on improving quality of life for patients undergoing bladder preservation. Preservation strategies with most evidence for use include trimodality therapy and partial cystectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the breadth of strategies that aim to preserve a patient’s bladder while still optimizing local tumor control and overall survival. Future areas for innovation include the use of predictive biomarkers and implementation of immunotherapy, moving the field towards patient-tailored care. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2020-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7025842/ /pubmed/31961624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Hamad, Judy
McCloskey, Hannah
Milowsky, Matthew I.
Royce, Trevor
Smith, Angela
Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title_full Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title_fullStr Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title_full_unstemmed Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title_short Bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
title_sort bladder preservation in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a comprehensive review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31961624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.99.01
work_keys_str_mv AT hamadjudy bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview
AT mccloskeyhannah bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview
AT milowskymatthewi bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview
AT roycetrevor bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview
AT smithangela bladderpreservationinmuscleinvasivebladdercanceracomprehensivereview