Cargando…
Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical success and satisfaction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with three different types of bonded restorations at a university clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty‐four restorations in 15 subjects with m...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.243 |
_version_ | 1783498592122568704 |
---|---|
author | Ohrvik, Hanne G. Hjortsjö, Carl |
author_facet | Ohrvik, Hanne G. Hjortsjö, Carl |
author_sort | Ohrvik, Hanne G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical success and satisfaction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with three different types of bonded restorations at a university clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty‐four restorations in 15 subjects with mean age of 17.3 years (SD 8.2) were evaluated after treatment with three different types of bonded restorations: all ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, prefabricated composite veneers, and direct composite resin restorations. A modified version of the Californian Dental Association system for quality evaluation of dental care and a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction were used for classification. The restorations were evaluated with respect to patient satisfaction, esthetics, technical, and biological complications. RESULTS: Mean observation period for the restorations was 42.5 months (SD 35.6). All restorations were in place at the time of the examination. Surface and color calibration showed a success of 95% for the ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, 44% for the direct composite resin restorations, and 0% for the prefabricated composite veneers. The same pattern was evident for anatomy and marginal integrity. The subjects reported a high degree of satisfaction with both the esthetics and function of their restorations. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that all ceramic restorations demonstrated the best results for patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7025981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70259812020-03-06 Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques Ohrvik, Hanne G. Hjortsjö, Carl Clin Exp Dent Res Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate clinical success and satisfaction of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with three different types of bonded restorations at a university clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred fifty‐four restorations in 15 subjects with mean age of 17.3 years (SD 8.2) were evaluated after treatment with three different types of bonded restorations: all ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, prefabricated composite veneers, and direct composite resin restorations. A modified version of the Californian Dental Association system for quality evaluation of dental care and a questionnaire assessing patient satisfaction were used for classification. The restorations were evaluated with respect to patient satisfaction, esthetics, technical, and biological complications. RESULTS: Mean observation period for the restorations was 42.5 months (SD 35.6). All restorations were in place at the time of the examination. Surface and color calibration showed a success of 95% for the ceramic enamel‐dentin bonded restorations, 44% for the direct composite resin restorations, and 0% for the prefabricated composite veneers. The same pattern was evident for anatomy and marginal integrity. The subjects reported a high degree of satisfaction with both the esthetics and function of their restorations. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that all ceramic restorations demonstrated the best results for patients with amelogenesis imperfecta. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7025981/ /pubmed/32067400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.243 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dental Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Ohrvik, Hanne G. Hjortsjö, Carl Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title | Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title_full | Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title_fullStr | Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title_short | Retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
title_sort | retrospective study of patients with amelogenesis imperfecta treated with different bonded restoration techniques |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7025981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32067400 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cre2.243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohrvikhanneg retrospectivestudyofpatientswithamelogenesisimperfectatreatedwithdifferentbondedrestorationtechniques AT hjortsjocarl retrospectivestudyofpatientswithamelogenesisimperfectatreatedwithdifferentbondedrestorationtechniques |