Cargando…

The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy

As ketamine is increasingly used as an effective antidepressant with rapid action, sustaining its short-lived efficacy over a longer period of time using a schedule of repeated injections appears as an option. An open question is whether repeated and single administrations would affect convergent ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gass, Natalia, Becker, Robert, Reinwald, Jonathan, Cosa-Linan, Alejandro, Sack, Markus, Weber-Fahr, Wolfgang, Vollmayr, Barbara, Sartorius, Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0727-8
_version_ 1783498605490864128
author Gass, Natalia
Becker, Robert
Reinwald, Jonathan
Cosa-Linan, Alejandro
Sack, Markus
Weber-Fahr, Wolfgang
Vollmayr, Barbara
Sartorius, Alexander
author_facet Gass, Natalia
Becker, Robert
Reinwald, Jonathan
Cosa-Linan, Alejandro
Sack, Markus
Weber-Fahr, Wolfgang
Vollmayr, Barbara
Sartorius, Alexander
author_sort Gass, Natalia
collection PubMed
description As ketamine is increasingly used as an effective antidepressant with rapid action, sustaining its short-lived efficacy over a longer period of time using a schedule of repeated injections appears as an option. An open question is whether repeated and single administrations would affect convergent neurocircuits. We used a combination of one of the most robust animal models of depression with high-field neuroimaging to perform a whole-brain delineation of functional mechanisms underlying ketamine’s effects. Rats from two genetic strains, depressive-like and resilient, received seven treatments of 10 mg/kg S-ketamine (N = 14 depressive-like, N = 11 resilient) or placebo (N = 12 depressive-like, N = 10 resilient) and underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Using graph theoretical models of brain networks, we compared effects of repeated ketamine with those of single administration from a separate dataset of our previous study. Compared to single treatment, repeated ketamine evoked strain-specific brain network randomization, resembling characteristics of the depressive-like strain and patients. Several affected regions belonged to the auditory, visual, and motor circuitry, hinting at possible cumulative side effects. Finally, when compared to saline, repeated ketamine affected only a few local topological properties and had no effects on global properties. In combination with the lack of clear differences compared to placebo, our findings point toward an inefficacy of ketamine’s long-term administration on brain topology, making questionable the postulated effect of repeated administration and being consistent with the recently reported absence of repeated ketamine’s antidepressant efficacy in several placebo-controlled studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7026038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70260382020-03-03 The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy Gass, Natalia Becker, Robert Reinwald, Jonathan Cosa-Linan, Alejandro Sack, Markus Weber-Fahr, Wolfgang Vollmayr, Barbara Sartorius, Alexander Transl Psychiatry Article As ketamine is increasingly used as an effective antidepressant with rapid action, sustaining its short-lived efficacy over a longer period of time using a schedule of repeated injections appears as an option. An open question is whether repeated and single administrations would affect convergent neurocircuits. We used a combination of one of the most robust animal models of depression with high-field neuroimaging to perform a whole-brain delineation of functional mechanisms underlying ketamine’s effects. Rats from two genetic strains, depressive-like and resilient, received seven treatments of 10 mg/kg S-ketamine (N = 14 depressive-like, N = 11 resilient) or placebo (N = 12 depressive-like, N = 10 resilient) and underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Using graph theoretical models of brain networks, we compared effects of repeated ketamine with those of single administration from a separate dataset of our previous study. Compared to single treatment, repeated ketamine evoked strain-specific brain network randomization, resembling characteristics of the depressive-like strain and patients. Several affected regions belonged to the auditory, visual, and motor circuitry, hinting at possible cumulative side effects. Finally, when compared to saline, repeated ketamine affected only a few local topological properties and had no effects on global properties. In combination with the lack of clear differences compared to placebo, our findings point toward an inefficacy of ketamine’s long-term administration on brain topology, making questionable the postulated effect of repeated administration and being consistent with the recently reported absence of repeated ketamine’s antidepressant efficacy in several placebo-controlled studies. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7026038/ /pubmed/32066682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0727-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gass, Natalia
Becker, Robert
Reinwald, Jonathan
Cosa-Linan, Alejandro
Sack, Markus
Weber-Fahr, Wolfgang
Vollmayr, Barbara
Sartorius, Alexander
The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title_full The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title_fullStr The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title_full_unstemmed The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title_short The influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
title_sort influence of ketamine’s repeated treatment on brain topology does not suggest an antidepressant efficacy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0727-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gassnatalia theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT beckerrobert theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT reinwaldjonathan theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT cosalinanalejandro theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT sackmarkus theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT weberfahrwolfgang theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT vollmayrbarbara theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT sartoriusalexander theinfluenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT gassnatalia influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT beckerrobert influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT reinwaldjonathan influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT cosalinanalejandro influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT sackmarkus influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT weberfahrwolfgang influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT vollmayrbarbara influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy
AT sartoriusalexander influenceofketaminesrepeatedtreatmentonbraintopologydoesnotsuggestanantidepressantefficacy