Cargando…
Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Singapore
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z |
_version_ | 1783498645956460544 |
---|---|
author | Hirota, Morihisa Shimosegawa, Tooru Kitamura, Katsuya Takeda, Kazunori Takeyama, Yoshifumi Mayumi, Toshihiko Ito, Tetsuhide Takenaka, Mamoru Iwasaki, Eisuke Sawano, Hirotaka Ishida, Etsuji Miura, Shin Masamune, Atsushi Nakai, Yousuke Mitoro, Akira Maguchi, Hiroyuki Kimura, Kenji Sanuki, Tsuyoshi Ito, Tetsuya Haradome, Hiroki Kozaka, Kazuto Gabata, Toshifumi Kataoka, Keisho Hirota, Masahiko Isaji, Shuji Nakamura, Ryoji Yamagiwa, Koki Kayaba, Chie Ikeda, Koji |
author_facet | Hirota, Morihisa Shimosegawa, Tooru Kitamura, Katsuya Takeda, Kazunori Takeyama, Yoshifumi Mayumi, Toshihiko Ito, Tetsuhide Takenaka, Mamoru Iwasaki, Eisuke Sawano, Hirotaka Ishida, Etsuji Miura, Shin Masamune, Atsushi Nakai, Yousuke Mitoro, Akira Maguchi, Hiroyuki Kimura, Kenji Sanuki, Tsuyoshi Ito, Tetsuya Haradome, Hiroki Kozaka, Kazuto Gabata, Toshifumi Kataoka, Keisho Hirota, Masahiko Isaji, Shuji Nakamura, Ryoji Yamagiwa, Koki Kayaba, Chie Ikeda, Koji |
author_sort | Hirota, Morihisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. METHODS: This investigator-initiated and -driven, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (UMIN000020868) enrolled 39 patients with predicted SAP and low enhancement of the pancreatic parenchyma on computed tomography (CT). Twenty patients were assigned to the CRAI group, while 19 served as controls and were administered NM at the same dose intravenously (IV group). The primary endpoint was the development of pancreatic necrosis as determined by CT on Day 14, judged by blinded central review. RESULTS: There was no difference between the CRAI and IV groups regarding the percentages of participants who developed pancreatic necrosis (more than 1/3 of the pancreas: 25.0%, range 8.7–49.1% vs. 15.8%, range 3.4–39.6%, respectively, P = 0.694; more than 2/3 of the pancreas: 20%, range 5.7–43.7% vs. 5.3%, range 0.1–26.0%, respectively, P = 0.341). The early analgesic effect was evaluated based on 24-h cumulative fentanyl consumption and additional administration by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The results showed that the CRAI group used significantly less analgesic. There were two adverse events related to CRAI, namely bleeding and splenic infarction. CONCLUSIONS: CRAI with NM did not inhibit the development of pancreatic necrosis although early analgesic effect of CRAI was superior to that of IV. Less-invasive IV therapy can be considered a viable alternative to CRAI therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7026212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Singapore |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70262122020-03-02 Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial Hirota, Morihisa Shimosegawa, Tooru Kitamura, Katsuya Takeda, Kazunori Takeyama, Yoshifumi Mayumi, Toshihiko Ito, Tetsuhide Takenaka, Mamoru Iwasaki, Eisuke Sawano, Hirotaka Ishida, Etsuji Miura, Shin Masamune, Atsushi Nakai, Yousuke Mitoro, Akira Maguchi, Hiroyuki Kimura, Kenji Sanuki, Tsuyoshi Ito, Tetsuya Haradome, Hiroki Kozaka, Kazuto Gabata, Toshifumi Kataoka, Keisho Hirota, Masahiko Isaji, Shuji Nakamura, Ryoji Yamagiwa, Koki Kayaba, Chie Ikeda, Koji J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. METHODS: This investigator-initiated and -driven, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (UMIN000020868) enrolled 39 patients with predicted SAP and low enhancement of the pancreatic parenchyma on computed tomography (CT). Twenty patients were assigned to the CRAI group, while 19 served as controls and were administered NM at the same dose intravenously (IV group). The primary endpoint was the development of pancreatic necrosis as determined by CT on Day 14, judged by blinded central review. RESULTS: There was no difference between the CRAI and IV groups regarding the percentages of participants who developed pancreatic necrosis (more than 1/3 of the pancreas: 25.0%, range 8.7–49.1% vs. 15.8%, range 3.4–39.6%, respectively, P = 0.694; more than 2/3 of the pancreas: 20%, range 5.7–43.7% vs. 5.3%, range 0.1–26.0%, respectively, P = 0.341). The early analgesic effect was evaluated based on 24-h cumulative fentanyl consumption and additional administration by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The results showed that the CRAI group used significantly less analgesic. There were two adverse events related to CRAI, namely bleeding and splenic infarction. CONCLUSIONS: CRAI with NM did not inhibit the development of pancreatic necrosis although early analgesic effect of CRAI was superior to that of IV. Less-invasive IV therapy can be considered a viable alternative to CRAI therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2019-11-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7026212/ /pubmed/31758329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract Hirota, Morihisa Shimosegawa, Tooru Kitamura, Katsuya Takeda, Kazunori Takeyama, Yoshifumi Mayumi, Toshihiko Ito, Tetsuhide Takenaka, Mamoru Iwasaki, Eisuke Sawano, Hirotaka Ishida, Etsuji Miura, Shin Masamune, Atsushi Nakai, Yousuke Mitoro, Akira Maguchi, Hiroyuki Kimura, Kenji Sanuki, Tsuyoshi Ito, Tetsuya Haradome, Hiroki Kozaka, Kazuto Gabata, Toshifumi Kataoka, Keisho Hirota, Masahiko Isaji, Shuji Nakamura, Ryoji Yamagiwa, Koki Kayaba, Chie Ikeda, Koji Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title | Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title_full | Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title_fullStr | Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title_short | Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
title_sort | continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial |
topic | Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirotamorihisa continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT shimosegawatooru continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT kitamurakatsuya continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT takedakazunori continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT takeyamayoshifumi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT mayumitoshihiko continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT itotetsuhide continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT takenakamamoru continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT iwasakieisuke continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT sawanohirotaka continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT ishidaetsuji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT miurashin continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT masamuneatsushi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT nakaiyousuke continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT mitoroakira continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT maguchihiroyuki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT kimurakenji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT sanukitsuyoshi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT itotetsuya continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT haradomehiroki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT kozakakazuto continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT gabatatoshifumi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT kataokakeisho continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT hirotamasahiko continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT isajishuji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT nakamuraryoji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT yamagiwakoki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT kayabachie continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial AT ikedakoji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial |