Cargando…

Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirota, Morihisa, Shimosegawa, Tooru, Kitamura, Katsuya, Takeda, Kazunori, Takeyama, Yoshifumi, Mayumi, Toshihiko, Ito, Tetsuhide, Takenaka, Mamoru, Iwasaki, Eisuke, Sawano, Hirotaka, Ishida, Etsuji, Miura, Shin, Masamune, Atsushi, Nakai, Yousuke, Mitoro, Akira, Maguchi, Hiroyuki, Kimura, Kenji, Sanuki, Tsuyoshi, Ito, Tetsuya, Haradome, Hiroki, Kozaka, Kazuto, Gabata, Toshifumi, Kataoka, Keisho, Hirota, Masahiko, Isaji, Shuji, Nakamura, Ryoji, Yamagiwa, Koki, Kayaba, Chie, Ikeda, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Singapore 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z
_version_ 1783498645956460544
author Hirota, Morihisa
Shimosegawa, Tooru
Kitamura, Katsuya
Takeda, Kazunori
Takeyama, Yoshifumi
Mayumi, Toshihiko
Ito, Tetsuhide
Takenaka, Mamoru
Iwasaki, Eisuke
Sawano, Hirotaka
Ishida, Etsuji
Miura, Shin
Masamune, Atsushi
Nakai, Yousuke
Mitoro, Akira
Maguchi, Hiroyuki
Kimura, Kenji
Sanuki, Tsuyoshi
Ito, Tetsuya
Haradome, Hiroki
Kozaka, Kazuto
Gabata, Toshifumi
Kataoka, Keisho
Hirota, Masahiko
Isaji, Shuji
Nakamura, Ryoji
Yamagiwa, Koki
Kayaba, Chie
Ikeda, Koji
author_facet Hirota, Morihisa
Shimosegawa, Tooru
Kitamura, Katsuya
Takeda, Kazunori
Takeyama, Yoshifumi
Mayumi, Toshihiko
Ito, Tetsuhide
Takenaka, Mamoru
Iwasaki, Eisuke
Sawano, Hirotaka
Ishida, Etsuji
Miura, Shin
Masamune, Atsushi
Nakai, Yousuke
Mitoro, Akira
Maguchi, Hiroyuki
Kimura, Kenji
Sanuki, Tsuyoshi
Ito, Tetsuya
Haradome, Hiroki
Kozaka, Kazuto
Gabata, Toshifumi
Kataoka, Keisho
Hirota, Masahiko
Isaji, Shuji
Nakamura, Ryoji
Yamagiwa, Koki
Kayaba, Chie
Ikeda, Koji
author_sort Hirota, Morihisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. METHODS: This investigator-initiated and -driven, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (UMIN000020868) enrolled 39 patients with predicted SAP and low enhancement of the pancreatic parenchyma on computed tomography (CT). Twenty patients were assigned to the CRAI group, while 19 served as controls and were administered NM at the same dose intravenously (IV group). The primary endpoint was the development of pancreatic necrosis as determined by CT on Day 14, judged by blinded central review. RESULTS: There was no difference between the CRAI and IV groups regarding the percentages of participants who developed pancreatic necrosis (more than 1/3 of the pancreas: 25.0%, range 8.7–49.1% vs. 15.8%, range 3.4–39.6%, respectively, P = 0.694; more than 2/3 of the pancreas: 20%, range 5.7–43.7% vs. 5.3%, range 0.1–26.0%, respectively, P = 0.341). The early analgesic effect was evaluated based on 24-h cumulative fentanyl consumption and additional administration by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The results showed that the CRAI group used significantly less analgesic. There were two adverse events related to CRAI, namely bleeding and splenic infarction. CONCLUSIONS: CRAI with NM did not inhibit the development of pancreatic necrosis although early analgesic effect of CRAI was superior to that of IV. Less-invasive IV therapy can be considered a viable alternative to CRAI therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7026212
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Singapore
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70262122020-03-02 Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial Hirota, Morihisa Shimosegawa, Tooru Kitamura, Katsuya Takeda, Kazunori Takeyama, Yoshifumi Mayumi, Toshihiko Ito, Tetsuhide Takenaka, Mamoru Iwasaki, Eisuke Sawano, Hirotaka Ishida, Etsuji Miura, Shin Masamune, Atsushi Nakai, Yousuke Mitoro, Akira Maguchi, Hiroyuki Kimura, Kenji Sanuki, Tsuyoshi Ito, Tetsuya Haradome, Hiroki Kozaka, Kazuto Gabata, Toshifumi Kataoka, Keisho Hirota, Masahiko Isaji, Shuji Nakamura, Ryoji Yamagiwa, Koki Kayaba, Chie Ikeda, Koji J Gastroenterol Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract BACKGROUND: Continuous regional arterial infusion (CRAI) of protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate (NM) is used in the context of predicted severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) to prevent the development of pancreatic necrosis. Although this therapy is well known in Japan, its efficacy and safety remain unclear. METHODS: This investigator-initiated and -driven, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (UMIN000020868) enrolled 39 patients with predicted SAP and low enhancement of the pancreatic parenchyma on computed tomography (CT). Twenty patients were assigned to the CRAI group, while 19 served as controls and were administered NM at the same dose intravenously (IV group). The primary endpoint was the development of pancreatic necrosis as determined by CT on Day 14, judged by blinded central review. RESULTS: There was no difference between the CRAI and IV groups regarding the percentages of participants who developed pancreatic necrosis (more than 1/3 of the pancreas: 25.0%, range 8.7–49.1% vs. 15.8%, range 3.4–39.6%, respectively, P = 0.694; more than 2/3 of the pancreas: 20%, range 5.7–43.7% vs. 5.3%, range 0.1–26.0%, respectively, P = 0.341). The early analgesic effect was evaluated based on 24-h cumulative fentanyl consumption and additional administration by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. The results showed that the CRAI group used significantly less analgesic. There were two adverse events related to CRAI, namely bleeding and splenic infarction. CONCLUSIONS: CRAI with NM did not inhibit the development of pancreatic necrosis although early analgesic effect of CRAI was superior to that of IV. Less-invasive IV therapy can be considered a viable alternative to CRAI therapy. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Singapore 2019-11-22 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7026212/ /pubmed/31758329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
Hirota, Morihisa
Shimosegawa, Tooru
Kitamura, Katsuya
Takeda, Kazunori
Takeyama, Yoshifumi
Mayumi, Toshihiko
Ito, Tetsuhide
Takenaka, Mamoru
Iwasaki, Eisuke
Sawano, Hirotaka
Ishida, Etsuji
Miura, Shin
Masamune, Atsushi
Nakai, Yousuke
Mitoro, Akira
Maguchi, Hiroyuki
Kimura, Kenji
Sanuki, Tsuyoshi
Ito, Tetsuya
Haradome, Hiroki
Kozaka, Kazuto
Gabata, Toshifumi
Kataoka, Keisho
Hirota, Masahiko
Isaji, Shuji
Nakamura, Ryoji
Yamagiwa, Koki
Kayaba, Chie
Ikeda, Koji
Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title_full Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title_fullStr Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title_full_unstemmed Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title_short Continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
title_sort continuous regional arterial infusion versus intravenous administration of the protease inhibitor nafamostat mesilate for predicted severe acute pancreatitis: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial
topic Original Article—Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026212/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31758329
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-019-01644-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hirotamorihisa continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT shimosegawatooru continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT kitamurakatsuya continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT takedakazunori continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT takeyamayoshifumi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT mayumitoshihiko continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT itotetsuhide continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT takenakamamoru continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT iwasakieisuke continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT sawanohirotaka continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT ishidaetsuji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT miurashin continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT masamuneatsushi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT nakaiyousuke continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT mitoroakira continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT maguchihiroyuki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT kimurakenji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT sanukitsuyoshi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT itotetsuya continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT haradomehiroki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT kozakakazuto continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT gabatatoshifumi continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT kataokakeisho continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT hirotamasahiko continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT isajishuji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT nakamuraryoji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT yamagiwakoki continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT kayabachie continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial
AT ikedakoji continuousregionalarterialinfusionversusintravenousadministrationoftheproteaseinhibitornafamostatmesilateforpredictedsevereacutepancreatitisamulticenterrandomizedopenlabelphase2trial