Cargando…

Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability

Walking synchronized to external cues is a common practice in clinical settings. Several research studies showed that this popular gait rehabilitation tool alters gait variability. There is also recent evidence which suggests that alterations in the temporal structure of the external cues could rest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vaz, Joao R., Rand, Troy, Fujan-Hansen, Jessica, Mukherjee, Mukul, Stergiou, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116777
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00067
_version_ 1783498703135309824
author Vaz, Joao R.
Rand, Troy
Fujan-Hansen, Jessica
Mukherjee, Mukul
Stergiou, Nick
author_facet Vaz, Joao R.
Rand, Troy
Fujan-Hansen, Jessica
Mukherjee, Mukul
Stergiou, Nick
author_sort Vaz, Joao R.
collection PubMed
description Walking synchronized to external cues is a common practice in clinical settings. Several research studies showed that this popular gait rehabilitation tool alters gait variability. There is also recent evidence which suggests that alterations in the temporal structure of the external cues could restore gait variability at healthy levels. It is unknown, however, if such alterations produce similar effects if the cueing modalities used are different; visual or auditory. The modality could affect gait variability differentially, since there is evidence that auditory cues mostly act in the temporal domain of gait, while visual cues act in the spatial domain of gait. This study investigated how synchronizing steps with visual and auditory cues that are presented with different temporal structures could affect gait variability during treadmill walking. Three different temporal structured stimuli were used, invariant, fractal and random, in both modalities. Stride times, length and speed were determined, and their fractal scaling (an indicator of complexity) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. No differences were observed in the CV, regardless of the cueing modality and the temporal structure of the stimuli. In terms of the stride time’s fractal scaling, we observed that the fractal stimulus induced higher values compared to random and invariant stimuli. The same was also observed in stride length, but only for the visual cueing modality. No differences were observed for stride speed. The selection of the cueing modality seems to be an important feature of gait rehabilitation. Visual cues are possibly a better choice due to the dependency on vision during walking. This is particularly evident during treadmill walking, a common practice in a clinical setting. Because of the treadmill effect on the temporal domain of gait, the use of auditory cues can be minimal, compared to visual cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7026509
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70265092020-02-28 Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability Vaz, Joao R. Rand, Troy Fujan-Hansen, Jessica Mukherjee, Mukul Stergiou, Nick Front Physiol Physiology Walking synchronized to external cues is a common practice in clinical settings. Several research studies showed that this popular gait rehabilitation tool alters gait variability. There is also recent evidence which suggests that alterations in the temporal structure of the external cues could restore gait variability at healthy levels. It is unknown, however, if such alterations produce similar effects if the cueing modalities used are different; visual or auditory. The modality could affect gait variability differentially, since there is evidence that auditory cues mostly act in the temporal domain of gait, while visual cues act in the spatial domain of gait. This study investigated how synchronizing steps with visual and auditory cues that are presented with different temporal structures could affect gait variability during treadmill walking. Three different temporal structured stimuli were used, invariant, fractal and random, in both modalities. Stride times, length and speed were determined, and their fractal scaling (an indicator of complexity) and coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated. No differences were observed in the CV, regardless of the cueing modality and the temporal structure of the stimuli. In terms of the stride time’s fractal scaling, we observed that the fractal stimulus induced higher values compared to random and invariant stimuli. The same was also observed in stride length, but only for the visual cueing modality. No differences were observed for stride speed. The selection of the cueing modality seems to be an important feature of gait rehabilitation. Visual cues are possibly a better choice due to the dependency on vision during walking. This is particularly evident during treadmill walking, a common practice in a clinical setting. Because of the treadmill effect on the temporal domain of gait, the use of auditory cues can be minimal, compared to visual cues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7026509/ /pubmed/32116777 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00067 Text en Copyright © 2020 Vaz, Rand, Fujan-Hansen, Mukherjee and Stergiou. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Physiology
Vaz, Joao R.
Rand, Troy
Fujan-Hansen, Jessica
Mukherjee, Mukul
Stergiou, Nick
Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title_full Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title_fullStr Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title_full_unstemmed Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title_short Auditory and Visual External Cues Have Different Effects on Spatial but Similar Effects on Temporal Measures of Gait Variability
title_sort auditory and visual external cues have different effects on spatial but similar effects on temporal measures of gait variability
topic Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7026509/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116777
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00067
work_keys_str_mv AT vazjoaor auditoryandvisualexternalcueshavedifferenteffectsonspatialbutsimilareffectsontemporalmeasuresofgaitvariability
AT randtroy auditoryandvisualexternalcueshavedifferenteffectsonspatialbutsimilareffectsontemporalmeasuresofgaitvariability
AT fujanhansenjessica auditoryandvisualexternalcueshavedifferenteffectsonspatialbutsimilareffectsontemporalmeasuresofgaitvariability
AT mukherjeemukul auditoryandvisualexternalcueshavedifferenteffectsonspatialbutsimilareffectsontemporalmeasuresofgaitvariability
AT stergiounick auditoryandvisualexternalcueshavedifferenteffectsonspatialbutsimilareffectsontemporalmeasuresofgaitvariability