Cargando…

Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)

BACKGROUND: Despite the wide use of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34), the measurement invariance of the SCNS-SF34 across the main groups—gender and age—which might be of interest in the application of the instrument has never been confirmed. To provide an accurat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Edmond Pui Hang, Liao, Qiuyan, Soong, Inda, Chan, Karen Kar Loen, Lee, Conrad C. Y., Ng, Alice, Sze, Wing Kin, Tsang, Janice Wing Hang, Lee, Victor Ho Fun, Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01289-0
_version_ 1783498781377953792
author Choi, Edmond Pui Hang
Liao, Qiuyan
Soong, Inda
Chan, Karen Kar Loen
Lee, Conrad C. Y.
Ng, Alice
Sze, Wing Kin
Tsang, Janice Wing Hang
Lee, Victor Ho Fun
Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
author_facet Choi, Edmond Pui Hang
Liao, Qiuyan
Soong, Inda
Chan, Karen Kar Loen
Lee, Conrad C. Y.
Ng, Alice
Sze, Wing Kin
Tsang, Janice Wing Hang
Lee, Victor Ho Fun
Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
author_sort Choi, Edmond Pui Hang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the wide use of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34), the measurement invariance of the SCNS-SF34 across the main groups—gender and age—which might be of interest in the application of the instrument has never been confirmed. To provide an accurate assessment tool to evaluate the unmet needs of Chinese cancer patients, the present study aimed to assess the measurement invariance of the SCNS-SF34 across gender and age groups and to assess the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the SCNS-SF34. METHODS: The SCNS-SF34 was administrated to 1106 Chinese cancer patients. Other instruments included the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), the Short-Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Factor structure, internal construct validity, convergent validity, known-group validity and internal consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Our data fit the original five-factor model. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated measurement invariance across age and gender groups. The domains of the SCNS-SF34 had moderate correlations with the corresponding domains of the MSAS-SF, the SF-12 v2 and the HADS, which supported convergent validity. Of the 34 items, 33 had an item-total correlation that was corrected for an overlap of > 0.4 to support the internal construct validity. The SCNS-SF34 aptly differentiated patients by age and gender. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from 0.64 to 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the SCNS-SF34 across gender and age group. It is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the needs of Chinese patients with cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7027020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70270202020-02-24 Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34) Choi, Edmond Pui Hang Liao, Qiuyan Soong, Inda Chan, Karen Kar Loen Lee, Conrad C. Y. Ng, Alice Sze, Wing Kin Tsang, Janice Wing Hang Lee, Victor Ho Fun Lam, Wendy Wing Tak Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Despite the wide use of the Short-Form Supportive Care Needs Survey Questionnaire (SCNS-SF34), the measurement invariance of the SCNS-SF34 across the main groups—gender and age—which might be of interest in the application of the instrument has never been confirmed. To provide an accurate assessment tool to evaluate the unmet needs of Chinese cancer patients, the present study aimed to assess the measurement invariance of the SCNS-SF34 across gender and age groups and to assess the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the SCNS-SF34. METHODS: The SCNS-SF34 was administrated to 1106 Chinese cancer patients. Other instruments included the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF), the Short-Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Factor structure, internal construct validity, convergent validity, known-group validity and internal consistency were assessed. RESULTS: Our data fit the original five-factor model. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated measurement invariance across age and gender groups. The domains of the SCNS-SF34 had moderate correlations with the corresponding domains of the MSAS-SF, the SF-12 v2 and the HADS, which supported convergent validity. Of the 34 items, 33 had an item-total correlation that was corrected for an overlap of > 0.4 to support the internal construct validity. The SCNS-SF34 aptly differentiated patients by age and gender. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ranged from 0.64 to 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: We confirm the measurement invariance of the Chinese version of the SCNS-SF34 across gender and age group. It is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating the needs of Chinese patients with cancer. BioMed Central 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7027020/ /pubmed/32066444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01289-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Choi, Edmond Pui Hang
Liao, Qiuyan
Soong, Inda
Chan, Karen Kar Loen
Lee, Conrad C. Y.
Ng, Alice
Sze, Wing Kin
Tsang, Janice Wing Hang
Lee, Victor Ho Fun
Lam, Wendy Wing Tak
Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title_full Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title_fullStr Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title_full_unstemmed Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title_short Measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34)
title_sort measurement invariance across gender and age groups, validity and reliability of the chinese version of the short-form supportive care needs survey questionnaire (scns-sf34)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01289-0
work_keys_str_mv AT choiedmondpuihang measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT liaoqiuyan measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT soonginda measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT chankarenkarloen measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT leeconradcy measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT ngalice measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT szewingkin measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT tsangjanicewinghang measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT leevictorhofun measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34
AT lamwendywingtak measurementinvarianceacrossgenderandagegroupsvalidityandreliabilityofthechineseversionoftheshortformsupportivecareneedssurveyquestionnairescnssf34