Cargando…
Outpatient balloon catheter vs inpatient prostaglandin for induction of labour (OBLIGE): a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Approximately one in four pregnant women undergo an induction of labour. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness for mothers and babies of two methods of cervical ripening – inpatient care for women starting induction with va...
Autores principales: | Wise, Michelle R., Marriott, Joy, Battin, Malcolm, Thompson, John M. D., Stitely, Michael, Sadler, Lynn |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027046/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066505 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4061-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
por: Henry, Amanda, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review
por: Sangram Singh, Biswambhar, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
por: Bhide, Amarnath, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Outpatient Induction of Labor – Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?
por: Rath, Werner, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Is there a difference in labor patterns after induction with prostaglandins and double-balloon catheters?
por: Shalev-Ram, Hila, et al.
Publicado: (2023)