Cargando…
Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccin...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3 |
_version_ | 1783498791942356992 |
---|---|
author | Isler, Ozan Isler, Burcu Kopsacheilis, Orestis Ferguson, Eamonn |
author_facet | Isler, Ozan Isler, Burcu Kopsacheilis, Orestis Ferguson, Eamonn |
author_sort | Isler, Ozan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccination. We provide the first test whether this prosocial vaccination hypothesis applies to actual vaccination behaviour of high-risk patients. METHODS: In a field experiment at a tertiary care public hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, we compare the effects of two motivational messages for promoting vaccination. Using a between-subjects single-blind experimental design patients were randomly assigned to frames emphasizing the vaccine’s benefits to self (n = 125) or social benefits (n = 119). Free influenza vaccination was offered to each patient. RESULTS: Among 222 patients who were not vaccinated for the season prior to the study (72% medically assessed to be at high risk), 42% in the self-benefit frame chose to receive a vaccination compared with 34% in the social-benefits frame, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.95, p = 0.108). Reasons for vaccination focused primarily on self-benefit (67%) rather than social-benefit (5%). Exploratory analysis showed that the effect of messages depended on patient perception of risk group membership (aOR(High) / aOR(Low) = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30 to 24.05, p = 0.021). In particular, emphasis on self-benefit was more influential among patients who perceived themselves to be in the risk group (aOR = 6.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 22.88, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the literature observing intentions of low-risk populations, we found no evidence that social-benefit motivates actual vaccination behaviour among a high-risk patient population. Instead, those who self-categorize as being in the high risk group are more motivated by the self-benefit message. Our results suggest that a stratified approach can improve coverage: even if an emphasis on social-benefit could be effective among low-risk groups, an emphasis on self-benefit holds more promise for increasing vaccination in medical organizational settings where high-risk groups are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230343 Retrospectively registered on the 13th January 2020. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7027065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70270652020-02-24 Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour Isler, Ozan Isler, Burcu Kopsacheilis, Orestis Ferguson, Eamonn BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccination. We provide the first test whether this prosocial vaccination hypothesis applies to actual vaccination behaviour of high-risk patients. METHODS: In a field experiment at a tertiary care public hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, we compare the effects of two motivational messages for promoting vaccination. Using a between-subjects single-blind experimental design patients were randomly assigned to frames emphasizing the vaccine’s benefits to self (n = 125) or social benefits (n = 119). Free influenza vaccination was offered to each patient. RESULTS: Among 222 patients who were not vaccinated for the season prior to the study (72% medically assessed to be at high risk), 42% in the self-benefit frame chose to receive a vaccination compared with 34% in the social-benefits frame, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.95, p = 0.108). Reasons for vaccination focused primarily on self-benefit (67%) rather than social-benefit (5%). Exploratory analysis showed that the effect of messages depended on patient perception of risk group membership (aOR(High) / aOR(Low) = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30 to 24.05, p = 0.021). In particular, emphasis on self-benefit was more influential among patients who perceived themselves to be in the risk group (aOR = 6.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 22.88, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the literature observing intentions of low-risk populations, we found no evidence that social-benefit motivates actual vaccination behaviour among a high-risk patient population. Instead, those who self-categorize as being in the high risk group are more motivated by the self-benefit message. Our results suggest that a stratified approach can improve coverage: even if an emphasis on social-benefit could be effective among low-risk groups, an emphasis on self-benefit holds more promise for increasing vaccination in medical organizational settings where high-risk groups are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230343 Retrospectively registered on the 13th January 2020. BioMed Central 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7027065/ /pubmed/32066407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Isler, Ozan Isler, Burcu Kopsacheilis, Orestis Ferguson, Eamonn Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title | Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title_full | Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title_fullStr | Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title_full_unstemmed | Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title_short | Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
title_sort | limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT islerozan limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour AT islerburcu limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour AT kopsacheilisorestis limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour AT fergusoneamonn limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour |