Cargando…

Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Isler, Ozan, Isler, Burcu, Kopsacheilis, Orestis, Ferguson, Eamonn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3
_version_ 1783498791942356992
author Isler, Ozan
Isler, Burcu
Kopsacheilis, Orestis
Ferguson, Eamonn
author_facet Isler, Ozan
Isler, Burcu
Kopsacheilis, Orestis
Ferguson, Eamonn
author_sort Isler, Ozan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccination. We provide the first test whether this prosocial vaccination hypothesis applies to actual vaccination behaviour of high-risk patients. METHODS: In a field experiment at a tertiary care public hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, we compare the effects of two motivational messages for promoting vaccination. Using a between-subjects single-blind experimental design patients were randomly assigned to frames emphasizing the vaccine’s benefits to self (n = 125) or social benefits (n = 119). Free influenza vaccination was offered to each patient. RESULTS: Among 222 patients who were not vaccinated for the season prior to the study (72% medically assessed to be at high risk), 42% in the self-benefit frame chose to receive a vaccination compared with 34% in the social-benefits frame, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.95, p = 0.108). Reasons for vaccination focused primarily on self-benefit (67%) rather than social-benefit (5%). Exploratory analysis showed that the effect of messages depended on patient perception of risk group membership (aOR(High) / aOR(Low) = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30 to 24.05, p = 0.021). In particular, emphasis on self-benefit was more influential among patients who perceived themselves to be in the risk group (aOR = 6.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 22.88, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the literature observing intentions of low-risk populations, we found no evidence that social-benefit motivates actual vaccination behaviour among a high-risk patient population. Instead, those who self-categorize as being in the high risk group are more motivated by the self-benefit message. Our results suggest that a stratified approach can improve coverage: even if an emphasis on social-benefit could be effective among low-risk groups, an emphasis on self-benefit holds more promise for increasing vaccination in medical organizational settings where high-risk groups are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230343 Retrospectively registered on the 13th January 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7027065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70270652020-02-24 Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour Isler, Ozan Isler, Burcu Kopsacheilis, Orestis Ferguson, Eamonn BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine uptake remains low worldwide, inflicting substantial costs to public health. Messages promoting social welfare have been shown to increase vaccination intentions, and it has been recommended that health professionals communicate the socially beneficial aspects of vaccination. We provide the first test whether this prosocial vaccination hypothesis applies to actual vaccination behaviour of high-risk patients. METHODS: In a field experiment at a tertiary care public hospital in Istanbul, Turkey, we compare the effects of two motivational messages for promoting vaccination. Using a between-subjects single-blind experimental design patients were randomly assigned to frames emphasizing the vaccine’s benefits to self (n = 125) or social benefits (n = 119). Free influenza vaccination was offered to each patient. RESULTS: Among 222 patients who were not vaccinated for the season prior to the study (72% medically assessed to be at high risk), 42% in the self-benefit frame chose to receive a vaccination compared with 34% in the social-benefits frame, but the difference was not statistically significant (aOR = 1.63, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.95, p = 0.108). Reasons for vaccination focused primarily on self-benefit (67%) rather than social-benefit (5%). Exploratory analysis showed that the effect of messages depended on patient perception of risk group membership (aOR(High) / aOR(Low) = 5.59, 95% CI 1.30 to 24.05, p = 0.021). In particular, emphasis on self-benefit was more influential among patients who perceived themselves to be in the risk group (aOR = 6.22, 95% CI 1.69 to 22.88, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the literature observing intentions of low-risk populations, we found no evidence that social-benefit motivates actual vaccination behaviour among a high-risk patient population. Instead, those who self-categorize as being in the high risk group are more motivated by the self-benefit message. Our results suggest that a stratified approach can improve coverage: even if an emphasis on social-benefit could be effective among low-risk groups, an emphasis on self-benefit holds more promise for increasing vaccination in medical organizational settings where high-risk groups are prevalent. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04230343 Retrospectively registered on the 13th January 2020. BioMed Central 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7027065/ /pubmed/32066407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Isler, Ozan
Isler, Burcu
Kopsacheilis, Orestis
Ferguson, Eamonn
Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title_full Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title_fullStr Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title_full_unstemmed Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title_short Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
title_sort limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32066407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3
work_keys_str_mv AT islerozan limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour
AT islerburcu limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour
AT kopsacheilisorestis limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour
AT fergusoneamonn limitsofthesocialbenefitmotiveamonghighriskpatientsafieldexperimentoninfluenzavaccinationbehaviour