Cargando…
A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had establ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Entomological Society of America
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20695275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600 |
_version_ | 1783498834457919488 |
---|---|
author | Holder, Peter George, Sherly Disbury, Mark Singe, Monica Kean, John M. Mcfadden, Andrew |
author_facet | Holder, Peter George, Sherly Disbury, Mark Singe, Monica Kean, John M. Mcfadden, Andrew |
author_sort | Holder, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had established, resulted in a large-scale biosecurity surveillance and control program. The response was initiated in early March 2007 and completed by mid-May 2007. No further exotic mosquitoes were detected. The response surveillance program consisted of larval habitat surveys and high density ovi- and light trapping. It was coordinated with a habitat modification and S-methoprene treatment control program. The response policies were guided by analysis of surveillance and quality assurance data, population modeling, and trace-back activities. Mosquito habitat and activity close to port were both more abundant than expected, particularly in storm water drain sumps. Sumps are difficult to treat, and during the response some modification was required to the surveillance program and the control regime. We were assured of the absence or eradication of any Ae. albopictus population, as a result of nil detection from surveillance, backed up by four overlapping rounds of insecticide treatment of habitat. This work highlights the importance of port surveillance and may serve as a guide for responses for future urban mosquito incursions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7027260 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Entomological Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70272602020-02-25 A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand Holder, Peter George, Sherly Disbury, Mark Singe, Monica Kean, John M. Mcfadden, Andrew J Med Entomol Article A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had established, resulted in a large-scale biosecurity surveillance and control program. The response was initiated in early March 2007 and completed by mid-May 2007. No further exotic mosquitoes were detected. The response surveillance program consisted of larval habitat surveys and high density ovi- and light trapping. It was coordinated with a habitat modification and S-methoprene treatment control program. The response policies were guided by analysis of surveillance and quality assurance data, population modeling, and trace-back activities. Mosquito habitat and activity close to port were both more abundant than expected, particularly in storm water drain sumps. Sumps are difficult to treat, and during the response some modification was required to the surveillance program and the control regime. We were assured of the absence or eradication of any Ae. albopictus population, as a result of nil detection from surveillance, backed up by four overlapping rounds of insecticide treatment of habitat. This work highlights the importance of port surveillance and may serve as a guide for responses for future urban mosquito incursions. Entomological Society of America 2010-07 2010-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7027260/ /pubmed/20695275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600 Text en © 2010 Entomological Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Article Holder, Peter George, Sherly Disbury, Mark Singe, Monica Kean, John M. Mcfadden, Andrew A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title | A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title_full | A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title_fullStr | A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title_short | A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand |
title_sort | biosecurity response to aedes albopictus (diptera: culicidae) in auckland, new zealand |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027260/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20695275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT holderpeter abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT georgesherly abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT disburymark abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT singemonica abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT keanjohnm abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT mcfaddenandrew abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT holderpeter biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT georgesherly biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT disburymark biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT singemonica biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT keanjohnm biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand AT mcfaddenandrew biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand |