Cargando…

A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand

A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had establ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holder, Peter, George, Sherly, Disbury, Mark, Singe, Monica, Kean, John M., Mcfadden, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Entomological Society of America 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20695275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600
_version_ 1783498834457919488
author Holder, Peter
George, Sherly
Disbury, Mark
Singe, Monica
Kean, John M.
Mcfadden, Andrew
author_facet Holder, Peter
George, Sherly
Disbury, Mark
Singe, Monica
Kean, John M.
Mcfadden, Andrew
author_sort Holder, Peter
collection PubMed
description A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had established, resulted in a large-scale biosecurity surveillance and control program. The response was initiated in early March 2007 and completed by mid-May 2007. No further exotic mosquitoes were detected. The response surveillance program consisted of larval habitat surveys and high density ovi- and light trapping. It was coordinated with a habitat modification and S-methoprene treatment control program. The response policies were guided by analysis of surveillance and quality assurance data, population modeling, and trace-back activities. Mosquito habitat and activity close to port were both more abundant than expected, particularly in storm water drain sumps. Sumps are difficult to treat, and during the response some modification was required to the surveillance program and the control regime. We were assured of the absence or eradication of any Ae. albopictus population, as a result of nil detection from surveillance, backed up by four overlapping rounds of insecticide treatment of habitat. This work highlights the importance of port surveillance and may serve as a guide for responses for future urban mosquito incursions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7027260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Entomological Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70272602020-02-25 A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand Holder, Peter George, Sherly Disbury, Mark Singe, Monica Kean, John M. Mcfadden, Andrew J Med Entomol Article A biosecurity response was triggered by the detection of Aedes albopictus (Skuse) (Diptera: Culicidae) at the Port of Auckland, New Zealand. Ae. albopictus does not occur in New Zealand and is the most significant mosquito threat to this country. The possibility that a founding population had established, resulted in a large-scale biosecurity surveillance and control program. The response was initiated in early March 2007 and completed by mid-May 2007. No further exotic mosquitoes were detected. The response surveillance program consisted of larval habitat surveys and high density ovi- and light trapping. It was coordinated with a habitat modification and S-methoprene treatment control program. The response policies were guided by analysis of surveillance and quality assurance data, population modeling, and trace-back activities. Mosquito habitat and activity close to port were both more abundant than expected, particularly in storm water drain sumps. Sumps are difficult to treat, and during the response some modification was required to the surveillance program and the control regime. We were assured of the absence or eradication of any Ae. albopictus population, as a result of nil detection from surveillance, backed up by four overlapping rounds of insecticide treatment of habitat. This work highlights the importance of port surveillance and may serve as a guide for responses for future urban mosquito incursions. Entomological Society of America 2010-07 2010-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7027260/ /pubmed/20695275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600 Text en © 2010 Entomological Society of America http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Holder, Peter
George, Sherly
Disbury, Mark
Singe, Monica
Kean, John M.
Mcfadden, Andrew
A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title_full A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title_fullStr A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title_full_unstemmed A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title_short A Biosecurity Response to Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Auckland, New Zealand
title_sort biosecurity response to aedes albopictus (diptera: culicidae) in auckland, new zealand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20695275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmedent/47.4.600
work_keys_str_mv AT holderpeter abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT georgesherly abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT disburymark abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT singemonica abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT keanjohnm abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT mcfaddenandrew abiosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT holderpeter biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT georgesherly biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT disburymark biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT singemonica biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT keanjohnm biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand
AT mcfaddenandrew biosecurityresponsetoaedesalbopictusdipteraculicidaeinaucklandnewzealand