Cargando…

Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?

Introduction: Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be easily used because patients are placed in the supine position during total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach (DAA-THA) to reduce complications. However, the cumulative level of radiation exposure by intraoperative fluoroscopy increases as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jinnai, Yuta, Baba, Tomonori, Zhuang, Xu, Tanabe, Hiroki, Banno, Sammy, Watari, Taiji, Homma, Yasuhiro, Kaneko, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: EDP Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020004
_version_ 1783498857969090560
author Jinnai, Yuta
Baba, Tomonori
Zhuang, Xu
Tanabe, Hiroki
Banno, Sammy
Watari, Taiji
Homma, Yasuhiro
Kaneko, Kazuo
author_facet Jinnai, Yuta
Baba, Tomonori
Zhuang, Xu
Tanabe, Hiroki
Banno, Sammy
Watari, Taiji
Homma, Yasuhiro
Kaneko, Kazuo
author_sort Jinnai, Yuta
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be easily used because patients are placed in the supine position during total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach (DAA-THA) to reduce complications. However, the cumulative level of radiation exposure by intraoperative fluoroscopy increases as the annual number of cases increases, increasing the risk of influencing the health of both the patients and medical workers. The objective of the study was to compare the radiation exposure time of DAA-THA with osteosynthesis and to determine if the level of radiation exposure exceeded safety limits. Material and methods: DAA-THA was performed in 313 patients between January 2016 and July 2018 and 60 patients with proximal femoral fracture were treated with osteosynthesis. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time was retrospectively surveyed and compared between these two groups. A total of eight surgeons operated DAA-THA employing the same procedure using a traction table. A total of nine surgeons operated osteosynthesis and fluoroscopy was appropriately used during reduction and implant insertion. Results: The mean operative time of DAA-THA was 103.3 min and that of osteosynthesis was 83.3 min, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 0.83 min (SD ± 0.68) in DAA-THA and 8.91 min (SD ± 8.34) in osteosynthesis showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The intraoperative exposure level was significantly lower and the fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in DAA-THA than in osteosynthesis for proximal femoral fracture. It was clarified that the annual cumulative radiation exposure level in DAA-THA does not exceed the tissue dose limit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7027395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70273952020-03-05 Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon? Jinnai, Yuta Baba, Tomonori Zhuang, Xu Tanabe, Hiroki Banno, Sammy Watari, Taiji Homma, Yasuhiro Kaneko, Kazuo SICOT J Original Article Introduction: Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be easily used because patients are placed in the supine position during total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach (DAA-THA) to reduce complications. However, the cumulative level of radiation exposure by intraoperative fluoroscopy increases as the annual number of cases increases, increasing the risk of influencing the health of both the patients and medical workers. The objective of the study was to compare the radiation exposure time of DAA-THA with osteosynthesis and to determine if the level of radiation exposure exceeded safety limits. Material and methods: DAA-THA was performed in 313 patients between January 2016 and July 2018 and 60 patients with proximal femoral fracture were treated with osteosynthesis. The intraoperative fluoroscopy time was retrospectively surveyed and compared between these two groups. A total of eight surgeons operated DAA-THA employing the same procedure using a traction table. A total of nine surgeons operated osteosynthesis and fluoroscopy was appropriately used during reduction and implant insertion. Results: The mean operative time of DAA-THA was 103.3 min and that of osteosynthesis was 83.3 min, showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time was 0.83 min (SD ± 0.68) in DAA-THA and 8.91 min (SD ± 8.34) in osteosynthesis showing a significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The intraoperative exposure level was significantly lower and the fluoroscopy time was significantly shorter in DAA-THA than in osteosynthesis for proximal femoral fracture. It was clarified that the annual cumulative radiation exposure level in DAA-THA does not exceed the tissue dose limit. EDP Sciences 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7027395/ /pubmed/32068533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020004 Text en © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2020 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jinnai, Yuta
Baba, Tomonori
Zhuang, Xu
Tanabe, Hiroki
Banno, Sammy
Watari, Taiji
Homma, Yasuhiro
Kaneko, Kazuo
Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title_full Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title_fullStr Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title_full_unstemmed Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title_short Does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
title_sort does a fluoro-assisted direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty pose an excessive risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32068533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2020004
work_keys_str_mv AT jinnaiyuta doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT babatomonori doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT zhuangxu doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT tanabehiroki doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT bannosammy doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT wataritaiji doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT hommayasuhiro doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon
AT kanekokazuo doesafluoroassisteddirectanteriorapproachfortotalhiparthroplastyposeanexcessiveriskofradiationexposuretothesurgeon