Cargando…
Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of cognitive, socio-demographic and driving-related characteristics on self-regulation practices in older drivers with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (determined by the Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) score), compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment. DE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S236998 |
_version_ | 1783498912544325632 |
---|---|
author | Feng, Ying Ru Meuleners, Lynn Stevenson, Mark Heyworth, Jane Murray, Kevin Maher, Sean |
author_facet | Feng, Ying Ru Meuleners, Lynn Stevenson, Mark Heyworth, Jane Murray, Kevin Maher, Sean |
author_sort | Feng, Ying Ru |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of cognitive, socio-demographic and driving-related characteristics on self-regulation practices in older drivers with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (determined by the Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) score), compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study collected information from 362 drivers with MCI and 611 drivers with no cognitive impairment, who were aged 65+ years, and were living in Western Australia between November 2018 and February 2019. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported self-regulation driving practices. RESULTS: The majority of drivers with MCI (62.4%) and those with no cognitive impairment (57.1%) reported self-regulating their driving in at least one situation, in the past three months. The most common situations that both groups of drivers self-regulated in were “driving at night in the rain”, “parallel parking”, and “driving when raining”. Drivers with MCI were only significantly more likely to self-regulate when “making turns across oncoming traffic” and “driving at night”. They also had 39% greater odds of self-regulating in at least one driving situation, compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment (OR: 1.39, 95% CI=1.04–1.85, p=0.02). Females also had 2.3 times greater odds of self-regulating (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.76–3.12, p<0.001). Drivers aged 75+ years had 1.6 times greater odds of self-regulating, compared with drivers aged 65–69 years (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.12–2.23, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Older drivers with MCI were more likely to self-regulate their driving, compared to drivers with no cognitive impairment, particularly in complex driving situations. This suggests that some drivers with MCI may be able to recognize their cognitive limitations and adjust their driving accordingly. However, several drivers with MCI, particularly males, did not self-regulate their driving. This highlights the importance of advising patients about the impact of MCI on driving ability, suitable self-regulation strategies, as well as monitoring their driving ability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7027824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70278242020-02-26 Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment Feng, Ying Ru Meuleners, Lynn Stevenson, Mark Heyworth, Jane Murray, Kevin Maher, Sean Clin Interv Aging Original Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of cognitive, socio-demographic and driving-related characteristics on self-regulation practices in older drivers with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (determined by the Telephone Cognitive Screen (T-CogS) score), compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional study collected information from 362 drivers with MCI and 611 drivers with no cognitive impairment, who were aged 65+ years, and were living in Western Australia between November 2018 and February 2019. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported self-regulation driving practices. RESULTS: The majority of drivers with MCI (62.4%) and those with no cognitive impairment (57.1%) reported self-regulating their driving in at least one situation, in the past three months. The most common situations that both groups of drivers self-regulated in were “driving at night in the rain”, “parallel parking”, and “driving when raining”. Drivers with MCI were only significantly more likely to self-regulate when “making turns across oncoming traffic” and “driving at night”. They also had 39% greater odds of self-regulating in at least one driving situation, compared with drivers with no cognitive impairment (OR: 1.39, 95% CI=1.04–1.85, p=0.02). Females also had 2.3 times greater odds of self-regulating (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.76–3.12, p<0.001). Drivers aged 75+ years had 1.6 times greater odds of self-regulating, compared with drivers aged 65–69 years (OR=1.58, 95% CI=1.12–2.23, p=0.01). CONCLUSION: Older drivers with MCI were more likely to self-regulate their driving, compared to drivers with no cognitive impairment, particularly in complex driving situations. This suggests that some drivers with MCI may be able to recognize their cognitive limitations and adjust their driving accordingly. However, several drivers with MCI, particularly males, did not self-regulate their driving. This highlights the importance of advising patients about the impact of MCI on driving ability, suitable self-regulation strategies, as well as monitoring their driving ability. Dove 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7027824/ /pubmed/32103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S236998 Text en © 2020 Feng et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Feng, Ying Ru Meuleners, Lynn Stevenson, Mark Heyworth, Jane Murray, Kevin Maher, Sean Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title | Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_full | Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_fullStr | Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_full_unstemmed | Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_short | Driver Self-Regulation Practices in Older Drivers with and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment |
title_sort | driver self-regulation practices in older drivers with and without mild cognitive impairment |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32103924 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S236998 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fengyingru driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment AT meulenerslynn driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment AT stevensonmark driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment AT heyworthjane driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment AT murraykevin driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment AT mahersean driverselfregulationpracticesinolderdriverswithandwithoutmildcognitiveimpairment |