Cargando…
Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis
BACKGROUND: Zoonotic tuberculosis (zTB) accounts for 1.4% of the global tuberculosis burden, with the largest disease burden in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). These populations have increased exposure to zTB due to livestock rearing practices and raw dairy consumption. This qualitative sy...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12684 |
_version_ | 1783498920785084416 |
---|---|
author | Luciano, Sarah Anne Roess, Amira |
author_facet | Luciano, Sarah Anne Roess, Amira |
author_sort | Luciano, Sarah Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Zoonotic tuberculosis (zTB) accounts for 1.4% of the global tuberculosis burden, with the largest disease burden in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). These populations have increased exposure to zTB due to livestock rearing practices and raw dairy consumption. This qualitative systematic literature review evaluates the quality of the literature that examines the association between human zTB in LMICs and frequent exposure to livestock and livestock products and summarizes current gaps in laboratory detection methods. METHODS: The Navigation Guide, a systematic review framework utilized to assess environmental health exposures, was used to conduct this literature review. Peer‐reviewed research articles were selected and evaluated for risk of bias and quality of evidence. Only studies conducted in LMICs that mentioned livestock or livestock product exposure and had a confirmed diagnosis were eligible. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported prevalence of human zTB ranged from 0% to 28%, with cattle and raw dairy the primary exposures. All confirmed zTB cases were Mycobacterium bovis. Eight of the 15 studies included livestock sampling, predominantly cattle and reported prevalence of zTB between 0% and 23%. Laboratory methods used included nearly a dozen different culture methods and a variety of molecular methods, some of which are not appropriate for zTB. CONCLUSIONS: This review revealed the need for appropriate and standardized laboratory diagnostic methods, and large prospective studies of at‐risk populations to determine exposures that lead to an increased risk of tuberculosis conversion/infection to better understand the true burden of disease. Standardized, easy to implement laboratory diagnostics is an imperative focus for this scientific field to better identify the burden of zTB. Future studies pairing livestock and human subjects will allow better characterization of the high zTB transmission areas for targeted control and prevention programmes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7027859 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70278592020-02-24 Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis Luciano, Sarah Anne Roess, Amira Zoonoses Public Health Review BACKGROUND: Zoonotic tuberculosis (zTB) accounts for 1.4% of the global tuberculosis burden, with the largest disease burden in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). These populations have increased exposure to zTB due to livestock rearing practices and raw dairy consumption. This qualitative systematic literature review evaluates the quality of the literature that examines the association between human zTB in LMICs and frequent exposure to livestock and livestock products and summarizes current gaps in laboratory detection methods. METHODS: The Navigation Guide, a systematic review framework utilized to assess environmental health exposures, was used to conduct this literature review. Peer‐reviewed research articles were selected and evaluated for risk of bias and quality of evidence. Only studies conducted in LMICs that mentioned livestock or livestock product exposure and had a confirmed diagnosis were eligible. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Reported prevalence of human zTB ranged from 0% to 28%, with cattle and raw dairy the primary exposures. All confirmed zTB cases were Mycobacterium bovis. Eight of the 15 studies included livestock sampling, predominantly cattle and reported prevalence of zTB between 0% and 23%. Laboratory methods used included nearly a dozen different culture methods and a variety of molecular methods, some of which are not appropriate for zTB. CONCLUSIONS: This review revealed the need for appropriate and standardized laboratory diagnostic methods, and large prospective studies of at‐risk populations to determine exposures that lead to an increased risk of tuberculosis conversion/infection to better understand the true burden of disease. Standardized, easy to implement laboratory diagnostics is an imperative focus for this scientific field to better identify the burden of zTB. Future studies pairing livestock and human subjects will allow better characterization of the high zTB transmission areas for targeted control and prevention programmes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-09 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7027859/ /pubmed/31919980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12684 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Blackwell Verlag GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Luciano, Sarah Anne Roess, Amira Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title | Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title_full | Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title_fullStr | Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title_short | Human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: A systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
title_sort | human zoonotic tuberculosis and livestock exposure in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic review identifying challenges in laboratory diagnosis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027859/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919980 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zph.12684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lucianosarahanne humanzoonotictuberculosisandlivestockexposureinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewidentifyingchallengesinlaboratorydiagnosis AT roessamira humanzoonotictuberculosisandlivestockexposureinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreviewidentifyingchallengesinlaboratorydiagnosis |