Cargando…

Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity

Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ross, Robert, Neeland, Ian J., Yamashita, Shizuya, Shai, Iris, Seidell, Jaap, Magni, Paolo, Santos, Raul D., Arsenault, Benoit, Cuevas, Ada, Hu, Frank B., Griffin, Bruce A., Zambon, Alberto, Barter, Philip, Fruchart, Jean-Charles, Eckel, Robert H., Matsuzawa, Yuji, Després, Jean-Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7
_version_ 1783498936089051136
author Ross, Robert
Neeland, Ian J.
Yamashita, Shizuya
Shai, Iris
Seidell, Jaap
Magni, Paolo
Santos, Raul D.
Arsenault, Benoit
Cuevas, Ada
Hu, Frank B.
Griffin, Bruce A.
Zambon, Alberto
Barter, Philip
Fruchart, Jean-Charles
Eckel, Robert H.
Matsuzawa, Yuji
Després, Jean-Pierre
author_facet Ross, Robert
Neeland, Ian J.
Yamashita, Shizuya
Shai, Iris
Seidell, Jaap
Magni, Paolo
Santos, Raul D.
Arsenault, Benoit
Cuevas, Ada
Hu, Frank B.
Griffin, Bruce A.
Zambon, Alberto
Barter, Philip
Fruchart, Jean-Charles
Eckel, Robert H.
Matsuzawa, Yuji
Després, Jean-Pierre
author_sort Ross, Robert
collection PubMed
description Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumference afford practitioners with an important opportunity to improve the management and health of patients. We argue that BMI alone is not sufficient to properly assess or manage the cardiometabolic risk associated with increased adiposity in adults and provide a thorough review of the evidence that will empower health practitioners and professional societies to routinely include waist circumference in the evaluation and management of patients with overweight or obesity. We recommend that decreases in waist circumference are a critically important treatment target for reducing adverse health risks for both men and women. Moreover, we describe evidence that clinically relevant reductions in waist circumference can be achieved by routine, moderate-intensity exercise and/or dietary interventions. We identify gaps in the knowledge, including the refinement of waist circumference threshold values for a given BMI category, to optimize obesity risk stratification across age, sex and ethnicity. We recommend that health professionals are trained to properly perform this simple measurement and consider it as an important ‘vital sign’ in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7027970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70279702020-02-27 Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity Ross, Robert Neeland, Ian J. Yamashita, Shizuya Shai, Iris Seidell, Jaap Magni, Paolo Santos, Raul D. Arsenault, Benoit Cuevas, Ada Hu, Frank B. Griffin, Bruce A. Zambon, Alberto Barter, Philip Fruchart, Jean-Charles Eckel, Robert H. Matsuzawa, Yuji Després, Jean-Pierre Nat Rev Endocrinol Consensus Statement Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumference afford practitioners with an important opportunity to improve the management and health of patients. We argue that BMI alone is not sufficient to properly assess or manage the cardiometabolic risk associated with increased adiposity in adults and provide a thorough review of the evidence that will empower health practitioners and professional societies to routinely include waist circumference in the evaluation and management of patients with overweight or obesity. We recommend that decreases in waist circumference are a critically important treatment target for reducing adverse health risks for both men and women. Moreover, we describe evidence that clinically relevant reductions in waist circumference can be achieved by routine, moderate-intensity exercise and/or dietary interventions. We identify gaps in the knowledge, including the refinement of waist circumference threshold values for a given BMI category, to optimize obesity risk stratification across age, sex and ethnicity. We recommend that health professionals are trained to properly perform this simple measurement and consider it as an important ‘vital sign’ in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7027970/ /pubmed/32020062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Consensus Statement
Ross, Robert
Neeland, Ian J.
Yamashita, Shizuya
Shai, Iris
Seidell, Jaap
Magni, Paolo
Santos, Raul D.
Arsenault, Benoit
Cuevas, Ada
Hu, Frank B.
Griffin, Bruce A.
Zambon, Alberto
Barter, Philip
Fruchart, Jean-Charles
Eckel, Robert H.
Matsuzawa, Yuji
Després, Jean-Pierre
Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title_full Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title_fullStr Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title_full_unstemmed Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title_short Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
title_sort waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a consensus statement from the ias and iccr working group on visceral obesity
topic Consensus Statement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7
work_keys_str_mv AT rossrobert waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT neelandianj waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT yamashitashizuya waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT shaiiris waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT seidelljaap waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT magnipaolo waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT santosrauld waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT arsenaultbenoit waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT cuevasada waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT hufrankb waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT griffinbrucea waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT zambonalberto waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT barterphilip waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT fruchartjeancharles waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT eckelroberth waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT matsuzawayuji waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity
AT despresjeanpierre waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity