Cargando…
Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity
Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumf...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7 |
_version_ | 1783498936089051136 |
---|---|
author | Ross, Robert Neeland, Ian J. Yamashita, Shizuya Shai, Iris Seidell, Jaap Magni, Paolo Santos, Raul D. Arsenault, Benoit Cuevas, Ada Hu, Frank B. Griffin, Bruce A. Zambon, Alberto Barter, Philip Fruchart, Jean-Charles Eckel, Robert H. Matsuzawa, Yuji Després, Jean-Pierre |
author_facet | Ross, Robert Neeland, Ian J. Yamashita, Shizuya Shai, Iris Seidell, Jaap Magni, Paolo Santos, Raul D. Arsenault, Benoit Cuevas, Ada Hu, Frank B. Griffin, Bruce A. Zambon, Alberto Barter, Philip Fruchart, Jean-Charles Eckel, Robert H. Matsuzawa, Yuji Després, Jean-Pierre |
author_sort | Ross, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumference afford practitioners with an important opportunity to improve the management and health of patients. We argue that BMI alone is not sufficient to properly assess or manage the cardiometabolic risk associated with increased adiposity in adults and provide a thorough review of the evidence that will empower health practitioners and professional societies to routinely include waist circumference in the evaluation and management of patients with overweight or obesity. We recommend that decreases in waist circumference are a critically important treatment target for reducing adverse health risks for both men and women. Moreover, we describe evidence that clinically relevant reductions in waist circumference can be achieved by routine, moderate-intensity exercise and/or dietary interventions. We identify gaps in the knowledge, including the refinement of waist circumference threshold values for a given BMI category, to optimize obesity risk stratification across age, sex and ethnicity. We recommend that health professionals are trained to properly perform this simple measurement and consider it as an important ‘vital sign’ in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7027970 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70279702020-02-27 Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity Ross, Robert Neeland, Ian J. Yamashita, Shizuya Shai, Iris Seidell, Jaap Magni, Paolo Santos, Raul D. Arsenault, Benoit Cuevas, Ada Hu, Frank B. Griffin, Bruce A. Zambon, Alberto Barter, Philip Fruchart, Jean-Charles Eckel, Robert H. Matsuzawa, Yuji Després, Jean-Pierre Nat Rev Endocrinol Consensus Statement Despite decades of unequivocal evidence that waist circumference provides both independent and additive information to BMI for predicting morbidity and risk of death, this measurement is not routinely obtained in clinical practice. This Consensus Statement proposes that measurements of waist circumference afford practitioners with an important opportunity to improve the management and health of patients. We argue that BMI alone is not sufficient to properly assess or manage the cardiometabolic risk associated with increased adiposity in adults and provide a thorough review of the evidence that will empower health practitioners and professional societies to routinely include waist circumference in the evaluation and management of patients with overweight or obesity. We recommend that decreases in waist circumference are a critically important treatment target for reducing adverse health risks for both men and women. Moreover, we describe evidence that clinically relevant reductions in waist circumference can be achieved by routine, moderate-intensity exercise and/or dietary interventions. We identify gaps in the knowledge, including the refinement of waist circumference threshold values for a given BMI category, to optimize obesity risk stratification across age, sex and ethnicity. We recommend that health professionals are trained to properly perform this simple measurement and consider it as an important ‘vital sign’ in clinical practice. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7027970/ /pubmed/32020062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Consensus Statement Ross, Robert Neeland, Ian J. Yamashita, Shizuya Shai, Iris Seidell, Jaap Magni, Paolo Santos, Raul D. Arsenault, Benoit Cuevas, Ada Hu, Frank B. Griffin, Bruce A. Zambon, Alberto Barter, Philip Fruchart, Jean-Charles Eckel, Robert H. Matsuzawa, Yuji Després, Jean-Pierre Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title | Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title_full | Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title_fullStr | Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title_short | Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity |
title_sort | waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical practice: a consensus statement from the ias and iccr working group on visceral obesity |
topic | Consensus Statement |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7027970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32020062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rossrobert waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT neelandianj waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT yamashitashizuya waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT shaiiris waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT seidelljaap waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT magnipaolo waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT santosrauld waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT arsenaultbenoit waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT cuevasada waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT hufrankb waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT griffinbrucea waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT zambonalberto waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT barterphilip waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT fruchartjeancharles waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT eckelroberth waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT matsuzawayuji waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity AT despresjeanpierre waistcircumferenceasavitalsigninclinicalpracticeaconsensusstatementfromtheiasandiccrworkinggrouponvisceralobesity |