Cargando…

Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth

Organogenesis is a complex coordinated process of cell proliferation, growth, migration, and apoptosis. Differential growth rates, particularly during cardiogenesis, play a role in establishing morphology. Studies using stereological and cell sorting methods derive averages of morphogenetic paramete...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prakash, Stuti, de Boer, Bouke A., Hagoort, Jaco, Gunst, Quinn D., Ruijter, Jan M., van den Hoff, Maurice J. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30289204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23908
_version_ 1783498968989171712
author Prakash, Stuti
de Boer, Bouke A.
Hagoort, Jaco
Gunst, Quinn D.
Ruijter, Jan M.
van den Hoff, Maurice J. B.
author_facet Prakash, Stuti
de Boer, Bouke A.
Hagoort, Jaco
Gunst, Quinn D.
Ruijter, Jan M.
van den Hoff, Maurice J. B.
author_sort Prakash, Stuti
collection PubMed
description Organogenesis is a complex coordinated process of cell proliferation, growth, migration, and apoptosis. Differential growth rates, particularly during cardiogenesis, play a role in establishing morphology. Studies using stereological and cell sorting methods derive averages of morphogenetic parameters for an organ. To understand tissue composition and differential growth, the researcher must determine a number of morphogenetic parameters in the developing organ. Such measurements require sectioning to enable identification of organ borders, tissue components and cell types, three‐dimensional (3D)‐reconstruction of sections to visualize morphology and a 3D‐measurement scheme to build local morphogenetic information. Although thick the section confocal microscopy partially solves these issues, information loss at the section surface hampers the reconstruction of 3D morphology. Episcopic imaging provides the correct morphology but lacks histological procedures to identify multiple cell types. The 3D‐measurement scheme is based on systematic sampling, with overlapping sample volumes, of the entire organ in the aligned image stack. For each sample volume, morphogenetic variables are calculated and results projected back to the cube (boxel) at the sample volume center. Boxel size determines spatial resolution of the final quantitative 3D‐reconstruction whereas size of the sample volume determines the precision of the morphogenetic information. The methods described here can be used to measure tissue volume, proliferation and cell size, to determine contribution and distribution of cell types in a tissue and to display this information in a quantitative 3D‐reconstruction. Anat Rec, 302:49–57, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7028151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70281512020-02-25 Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth Prakash, Stuti de Boer, Bouke A. Hagoort, Jaco Gunst, Quinn D. Ruijter, Jan M. van den Hoff, Maurice J. B. Anat Rec (Hoboken) Special Issue Organogenesis is a complex coordinated process of cell proliferation, growth, migration, and apoptosis. Differential growth rates, particularly during cardiogenesis, play a role in establishing morphology. Studies using stereological and cell sorting methods derive averages of morphogenetic parameters for an organ. To understand tissue composition and differential growth, the researcher must determine a number of morphogenetic parameters in the developing organ. Such measurements require sectioning to enable identification of organ borders, tissue components and cell types, three‐dimensional (3D)‐reconstruction of sections to visualize morphology and a 3D‐measurement scheme to build local morphogenetic information. Although thick the section confocal microscopy partially solves these issues, information loss at the section surface hampers the reconstruction of 3D morphology. Episcopic imaging provides the correct morphology but lacks histological procedures to identify multiple cell types. The 3D‐measurement scheme is based on systematic sampling, with overlapping sample volumes, of the entire organ in the aligned image stack. For each sample volume, morphogenetic variables are calculated and results projected back to the cube (boxel) at the sample volume center. Boxel size determines spatial resolution of the final quantitative 3D‐reconstruction whereas size of the sample volume determines the precision of the morphogenetic information. The methods described here can be used to measure tissue volume, proliferation and cell size, to determine contribution and distribution of cell types in a tissue and to display this information in a quantitative 3D‐reconstruction. Anat Rec, 302:49–57, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-10-05 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7028151/ /pubmed/30289204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23908 Text en © 2018 The Authors The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Anatomists This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue
Prakash, Stuti
de Boer, Bouke A.
Hagoort, Jaco
Gunst, Quinn D.
Ruijter, Jan M.
van den Hoff, Maurice J. B.
Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title_full Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title_fullStr Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title_short Considerations for Measurement of Embryonic Organ Growth
title_sort considerations for measurement of embryonic organ growth
topic Special Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30289204
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ar.23908
work_keys_str_mv AT prakashstuti considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth
AT deboerboukea considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth
AT hagoortjaco considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth
AT gunstquinnd considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth
AT ruijterjanm considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth
AT vandenhoffmauricejb considerationsformeasurementofembryonicorgangrowth