Cargando…
Is it time to call for improvement in surgical techniques for minimally invasive radical hysterectomy?
Autores principales: | Chuang, Linus, Koirala, Pratistha, Nezhat, Farr |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32161434 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2019.00057 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Treatment of Early Cervical Cancer
por: Nezhat, Farr R., et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?
por: Soto, Enrique, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Challenges and Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Cervical Cancer: Open Radical Hysterectomy versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy
por: Röseler, Jona, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Clinical Utility of Preoperative Assessment in Ovarian Cancer Cytoreduction
por: Koirala, Pratistha, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Additional benefit of minimally invasive surgery to improve functional outcomes after radical hysterectomy
por: Park, Jeong-Yeol
Publicado: (2019)