Cargando…
The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer
Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123 |
_version_ | 1783499035799191552 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Xinhua Chen, Yuehong Hu, Yanfeng Lin, Tian Luo, Jun Li, Tuanjie Li, Tao Huang, HuiLin Zhu, Yu Li, Tingting Chen, Hao Liu, Hao Li, Guoxin Yu, Jiang |
author_facet | Chen, Xinhua Chen, Yuehong Hu, Yanfeng Lin, Tian Luo, Jun Li, Tuanjie Li, Tao Huang, HuiLin Zhu, Yu Li, Tingting Chen, Hao Liu, Hao Li, Guoxin Yu, Jiang |
author_sort | Chen, Xinhua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated. Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs. Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7028752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70287522020-02-28 The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer Chen, Xinhua Chen, Yuehong Hu, Yanfeng Lin, Tian Luo, Jun Li, Tuanjie Li, Tao Huang, HuiLin Zhu, Yu Li, Tingting Chen, Hao Liu, Hao Li, Guoxin Yu, Jiang Front Oncol Oncology Background: The number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLNs) affects the likelihood of detecting metastatic lymph nodes (MLNs) for gastric cancer (GC), but the retrieval of LNs is not satisfactory worldwide. There is no standard for LN examination. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 2,163 patients diagnosed with GC who underwent surgery at Nanfang Hospital between October 2004 and September 2016. According to the methods of LN examination, patients were classified into two groups: LN detection by pathologists (pathologist group) and LN examination by surgicopathologic team (surgicopathologist group). The relationship between RLNs and LN staging accuracy as well as the factors influencing the detection of MLNs were evaluated. Results: There were 472 males in pathologist group and 467 males in surgicopathologist group. The number of RLNs and MLNs in surgicopathologist group was significantly higher than that in pathologist group (RLNs: 53.8 ± 20.9 vs. 18.8 ± 11.5, p < 0.001; MLNs: 5.6 ± 9.8 vs. 3.9 ± 5.7, p < 0.001). Notably, the detection of N3b node status was significantly improved in surgicopathologist group [83 (11.9%) vs. 34 (4.8%), p < 0.001]. Additionally, the detection rate of N3b status gradually increased from 0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 16.6% in patients with more than 49 RLNs. The MLNs detected increased gradually from 2.3 ± 3.0 in patients with 1-16 RLNs to 7.3 ± 11.7 in patients with more than 49 RLNs. Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated that LN examination by surgicopathologic team, more advanced pT, tumor size ≥5 cm and combined organ(s) resection were related to detecting more MLNs. Conclusions: The retrieval of nodes immediately postoperatively by the surgicopathologic team could significantly improve the number of RLNs, detect more MLNs, and screen more patients with N3b node status. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7028752/ /pubmed/32117770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123 Text en Copyright © 2020 Chen, Chen, Hu, Lin, Luo, Li, Li, Huang, Zhu, Li, Chen, Liu, Li and Yu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Chen, Xinhua Chen, Yuehong Hu, Yanfeng Lin, Tian Luo, Jun Li, Tuanjie Li, Tao Huang, HuiLin Zhu, Yu Li, Tingting Chen, Hao Liu, Hao Li, Guoxin Yu, Jiang The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title | The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_full | The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_fullStr | The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_short | The Methods of Lymph Node Examination Make a Difference to Node Staging and Detection of N3b Node Status for Gastric Cancer |
title_sort | methods of lymph node examination make a difference to node staging and detection of n3b node status for gastric cancer |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32117770 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00123 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenxinhua themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT chenyuehong themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huyanfeng themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT lintian themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT luojun themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT lituanjie themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT litao themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huanghuilin themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT zhuyu themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT litingting themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT chenhao themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT liuhao themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT liguoxin themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yujiang themethodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT chenxinhua methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT chenyuehong methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huyanfeng methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT lintian methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT luojun methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT lituanjie methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT litao methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT huanghuilin methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT zhuyu methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT litingting methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT chenhao methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT liuhao methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT liguoxin methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer AT yujiang methodsoflymphnodeexaminationmakeadifferencetonodestaginganddetectionofn3bnodestatusforgastriccancer |