Cargando…
Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3 |
_version_ | 1783499053557874688 |
---|---|
author | Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. |
author_facet | Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. |
author_sort | Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used six key components: recruitment, context, reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Data were collected using questionnaires, checklists and research logbooks and were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: In total, 16 hospitals, 33 nurses and 7 oncological occupational physicians (OOPs) participated. Analysis of the six key components revealed that the inclusion rate of eligible patients was 47%. Thirty-eight intervention patients were included: 35 actually had a first meeting, 32 had a second and 17 had a third. For 31 patients (89%), the first meeting was face to face, as per protocol. However, in only 32% of the cases referred to support type A (oncological nurse) and 13% of the cases referred to support type B (OOP), the first meeting was before the start of the treatment, as per protocol. The average duration of the support type A meetings was around the pre-established 30 min; for the OOPs, the average was 50 min. Protocol was easy to follow according to the healthcare professionals. Overall, the patients considered the intervention useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the strategy of tailored work-related support is appreciated by both patients and healthcare professionals and applicable in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The intervention was appreciated by patients; however, whether the timing of the work-related support was adequate (i.e. before treatment was started) requires further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5022. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7028837 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70288372020-03-03 Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used six key components: recruitment, context, reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Data were collected using questionnaires, checklists and research logbooks and were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: In total, 16 hospitals, 33 nurses and 7 oncological occupational physicians (OOPs) participated. Analysis of the six key components revealed that the inclusion rate of eligible patients was 47%. Thirty-eight intervention patients were included: 35 actually had a first meeting, 32 had a second and 17 had a third. For 31 patients (89%), the first meeting was face to face, as per protocol. However, in only 32% of the cases referred to support type A (oncological nurse) and 13% of the cases referred to support type B (OOP), the first meeting was before the start of the treatment, as per protocol. The average duration of the support type A meetings was around the pre-established 30 min; for the OOPs, the average was 50 min. Protocol was easy to follow according to the healthcare professionals. Overall, the patients considered the intervention useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the strategy of tailored work-related support is appreciated by both patients and healthcare professionals and applicable in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The intervention was appreciated by patients; however, whether the timing of the work-related support was adequate (i.e. before treatment was started) requires further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5022. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-11-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7028837/ /pubmed/31745819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title | Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title_full | Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title_fullStr | Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title_short | Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
title_sort | process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028837/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zamananneclairegnm processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer AT tytgatkristienmaj processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer AT klinkenbijljeanhg processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer AT deboerangelagem processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer AT fringsdresenmoniquehw processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer |