Cargando…

Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer

PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M., Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J., Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G., de Boer, Angela G. E. M., Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3
_version_ 1783499053557874688
author Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
author_facet Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
author_sort Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used six key components: recruitment, context, reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Data were collected using questionnaires, checklists and research logbooks and were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: In total, 16 hospitals, 33 nurses and 7 oncological occupational physicians (OOPs) participated. Analysis of the six key components revealed that the inclusion rate of eligible patients was 47%. Thirty-eight intervention patients were included: 35 actually had a first meeting, 32 had a second and 17 had a third. For 31 patients (89%), the first meeting was face to face, as per protocol. However, in only 32% of the cases referred to support type A (oncological nurse) and 13% of the cases referred to support type B (OOP), the first meeting was before the start of the treatment, as per protocol. The average duration of the support type A meetings was around the pre-established 30 min; for the OOPs, the average was 50 min. Protocol was easy to follow according to the healthcare professionals. Overall, the patients considered the intervention useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the strategy of tailored work-related support is appreciated by both patients and healthcare professionals and applicable in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The intervention was appreciated by patients; however, whether the timing of the work-related support was adequate (i.e. before treatment was started) requires further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5022. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7028837
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70288372020-03-03 Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M. Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: To perform a process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: The intervention comprised three tailored psychosocial work-related support meetings. To outline the process evaluation of this intervention, we used six key components: recruitment, context, reach, dose delivered, dose received and fidelity. Data were collected using questionnaires, checklists and research logbooks and were analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: In total, 16 hospitals, 33 nurses and 7 oncological occupational physicians (OOPs) participated. Analysis of the six key components revealed that the inclusion rate of eligible patients was 47%. Thirty-eight intervention patients were included: 35 actually had a first meeting, 32 had a second and 17 had a third. For 31 patients (89%), the first meeting was face to face, as per protocol. However, in only 32% of the cases referred to support type A (oncological nurse) and 13% of the cases referred to support type B (OOP), the first meeting was before the start of the treatment, as per protocol. The average duration of the support type A meetings was around the pre-established 30 min; for the OOPs, the average was 50 min. Protocol was easy to follow according to the healthcare professionals. Overall, the patients considered the intervention useful. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that the strategy of tailored work-related support is appreciated by both patients and healthcare professionals and applicable in clinical practice. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The intervention was appreciated by patients; however, whether the timing of the work-related support was adequate (i.e. before treatment was started) requires further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR5022. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2019-11-19 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7028837/ /pubmed/31745819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Zaman, AnneClaire G. N. M.
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Klinkenbijl, Jean H. G.
de Boer, Angela G. E. M.
Frings-Dresen, Monique H. W.
Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title_full Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title_fullStr Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title_short Process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
title_sort process evaluation of a tailored work-related support intervention for patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31745819
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00797-3
work_keys_str_mv AT zamananneclairegnm processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer
AT tytgatkristienmaj processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer
AT klinkenbijljeanhg processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer
AT deboerangelagem processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer
AT fringsdresenmoniquehw processevaluationofatailoredworkrelatedsupportinterventionforpatientsdiagnosedwithgastrointestinalcancer