Cargando…

Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters

Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karlsson, Therese M., Kärrman, Anna, Rotander, Anna, Hassellöv, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5
_version_ 1783499053789609984
author Karlsson, Therese M.
Kärrman, Anna
Rotander, Anna
Hassellöv, Martin
author_facet Karlsson, Therese M.
Kärrman, Anna
Rotander, Anna
Hassellöv, Martin
author_sort Karlsson, Therese M.
collection PubMed
description Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are qualitative rather than quantitative. In order to allow for a quantitative comparison of microplastics abundance, it is crucial to understand the differences between sampling methods. Therefore, a manta trawl and an in situ filtering pump were compared during realistic, but controlled, field tests. Identical microplastic analyses of all replicates allowed the differences between the methods with respect to (1) precision, (2) concentrations, and (3) composition to be assessed. The results show that the pump gave higher accuracy with respect to volume than the trawl. The trawl, however, sampled higher concentrations, which appeared to be due to a more efficient sampling of particles on the sea surface microlayer, such as expanded polystyrene and air-filled microspheres. The trawl also sampled a higher volume, which decreased statistical counting uncertainties. A key finding in this study was that, regardless of sampling method, it is critical that a sufficiently high volume is sampled to provide enough particles for statistical evaluation. Due to the patchiness of this type of contaminant, our data indicate that a minimum of 26 particles per sample should be recorded to allow for concentration comparisons and to avoid false null values. The necessary amount of replicates to detect temporal or spatial differences is also discussed. For compositional differences and size distributions, even higher particle counts would be necessary. Quantitative measurements and comparisons would also require an unbiased approach towards both visual and spectroscopic identification. To facilitate the development of such methods, a visual protocol that can be further developed to fit different needs is introduced and discussed. Some of the challenges encountered while using FTIR microspectroscopic particle identification are also critically discussed in relation to specific compositions found. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7028838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70288382020-03-03 Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters Karlsson, Therese M. Kärrman, Anna Rotander, Anna Hassellöv, Martin Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article Owing to the development and adoption of a variety of methods for sampling and identifying microplastics, there is now data showing the presence of microplastics in surface waters from all over the world. The difference between the methods, however, hampers comparisons, and to date, most studies are qualitative rather than quantitative. In order to allow for a quantitative comparison of microplastics abundance, it is crucial to understand the differences between sampling methods. Therefore, a manta trawl and an in situ filtering pump were compared during realistic, but controlled, field tests. Identical microplastic analyses of all replicates allowed the differences between the methods with respect to (1) precision, (2) concentrations, and (3) composition to be assessed. The results show that the pump gave higher accuracy with respect to volume than the trawl. The trawl, however, sampled higher concentrations, which appeared to be due to a more efficient sampling of particles on the sea surface microlayer, such as expanded polystyrene and air-filled microspheres. The trawl also sampled a higher volume, which decreased statistical counting uncertainties. A key finding in this study was that, regardless of sampling method, it is critical that a sufficiently high volume is sampled to provide enough particles for statistical evaluation. Due to the patchiness of this type of contaminant, our data indicate that a minimum of 26 particles per sample should be recorded to allow for concentration comparisons and to avoid false null values. The necessary amount of replicates to detect temporal or spatial differences is also discussed. For compositional differences and size distributions, even higher particle counts would be necessary. Quantitative measurements and comparisons would also require an unbiased approach towards both visual and spectroscopic identification. To facilitate the development of such methods, a visual protocol that can be further developed to fit different needs is introduced and discussed. Some of the challenges encountered while using FTIR microspectroscopic particle identification are also critically discussed in relation to specific compositions found. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-12-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7028838/ /pubmed/31853844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Karlsson, Therese M.
Kärrman, Anna
Rotander, Anna
Hassellöv, Martin
Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title_full Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title_fullStr Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title_short Comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
title_sort comparison between manta trawl and in situ pump filtration methods, and guidance for visual identification of microplastics in surface waters
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31853844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-07274-5
work_keys_str_mv AT karlssontheresem comparisonbetweenmantatrawlandinsitupumpfiltrationmethodsandguidanceforvisualidentificationofmicroplasticsinsurfacewaters
AT karrmananna comparisonbetweenmantatrawlandinsitupumpfiltrationmethodsandguidanceforvisualidentificationofmicroplasticsinsurfacewaters
AT rotanderanna comparisonbetweenmantatrawlandinsitupumpfiltrationmethodsandguidanceforvisualidentificationofmicroplasticsinsurfacewaters
AT hassellovmartin comparisonbetweenmantatrawlandinsitupumpfiltrationmethodsandguidanceforvisualidentificationofmicroplasticsinsurfacewaters