Cargando…
Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts
Data from several large high-throughput drug response screens have become available to the scientific community recently. Although many efforts have been made to use this information to predict drug sensitivity, our ability to accurately predict drug response based on genetic data remains limited. I...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32071383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59656-2 |
_version_ | 1783499069164879872 |
---|---|
author | Kurilov, Roman Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Brors, Benedikt |
author_facet | Kurilov, Roman Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Brors, Benedikt |
author_sort | Kurilov, Roman |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data from several large high-throughput drug response screens have become available to the scientific community recently. Although many efforts have been made to use this information to predict drug sensitivity, our ability to accurately predict drug response based on genetic data remains limited. In order to systematically examine how different aspects of modelling affect the resulting prediction accuracy, we built a range of models for seven drugs (erlotinib, pacliatxel, lapatinib, PLX4720, sorafenib, nutlin-3 and nilotinib) using data from the largest available cell line and xenograft drug sensitivity screens. We found that the drug response metric, the choice of the molecular data type and the number of training samples have a substantial impact on prediction accuracy. We also compared the tasks of drug response prediction with tissue type prediction and found that, unlike for drug response, tissue type can be predicted with high accuracy. Furthermore, we assessed our ability to predict drug response in four xenograft cohorts (treated either with erlotinib, gemcitabine or paclitaxel) using models trained on cell line data. We could predict response in an erlotinib-treated cohort with a moderate accuracy (correlation ≈ 0.5), but were unable to correctly predict responses in cohorts treated with gemcitabine or paclitaxel. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7028927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70289272020-02-26 Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts Kurilov, Roman Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Brors, Benedikt Sci Rep Article Data from several large high-throughput drug response screens have become available to the scientific community recently. Although many efforts have been made to use this information to predict drug sensitivity, our ability to accurately predict drug response based on genetic data remains limited. In order to systematically examine how different aspects of modelling affect the resulting prediction accuracy, we built a range of models for seven drugs (erlotinib, pacliatxel, lapatinib, PLX4720, sorafenib, nutlin-3 and nilotinib) using data from the largest available cell line and xenograft drug sensitivity screens. We found that the drug response metric, the choice of the molecular data type and the number of training samples have a substantial impact on prediction accuracy. We also compared the tasks of drug response prediction with tissue type prediction and found that, unlike for drug response, tissue type can be predicted with high accuracy. Furthermore, we assessed our ability to predict drug response in four xenograft cohorts (treated either with erlotinib, gemcitabine or paclitaxel) using models trained on cell line data. We could predict response in an erlotinib-treated cohort with a moderate accuracy (correlation ≈ 0.5), but were unable to correctly predict responses in cohorts treated with gemcitabine or paclitaxel. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7028927/ /pubmed/32071383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59656-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Kurilov, Roman Haibe-Kains, Benjamin Brors, Benedikt Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title | Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title_full | Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title_fullStr | Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title_short | Assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
title_sort | assessment of modelling strategies for drug response prediction in cell lines and xenografts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7028927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32071383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59656-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kurilovroman assessmentofmodellingstrategiesfordrugresponsepredictionincelllinesandxenografts AT haibekainsbenjamin assessmentofmodellingstrategiesfordrugresponsepredictionincelllinesandxenografts AT brorsbenedikt assessmentofmodellingstrategiesfordrugresponsepredictionincelllinesandxenografts |