Cargando…
A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution
1. The open source and free programming language R is a phenomenal mechanism to address a multiplicity of challenges in ecology and evolution. It is also a complex ecosystem because of the diversity of solutions available to the analyst. 2. Packages for R enhance and specialize the capacity to explo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5970 |
_version_ | 1783499093609283584 |
---|---|
author | Lortie, Christopher J. Braun, Jenna Filazzola, Alessandro Miguel, Florencia |
author_facet | Lortie, Christopher J. Braun, Jenna Filazzola, Alessandro Miguel, Florencia |
author_sort | Lortie, Christopher J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | 1. The open source and free programming language R is a phenomenal mechanism to address a multiplicity of challenges in ecology and evolution. It is also a complex ecosystem because of the diversity of solutions available to the analyst. 2. Packages for R enhance and specialize the capacity to explore both niche data/experiments and more common needs. However, the paradox of choice or how we select between many seemingly similar options can be overwhelming and lead to different potential outcomes. 3. There is extensive choice in ecology and evolution between packages for both fundamental statistics and for more specialized domain‐level analyses. 4. Here, we provide a checklist to inform these decisions based on the principles of resilience, need, and integration with scientific workflows for evidence. 5. It is important to explore choices in any analytical coding environment—not just R—for solutions to challenges in ecology and evolution, and document this process because it advances reproducible science, promotes a deeper understand of the scientific evidence, and ensures that the outcomes are correct, representative, and robust. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7029065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70290652020-02-19 A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution Lortie, Christopher J. Braun, Jenna Filazzola, Alessandro Miguel, Florencia Ecol Evol Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution 1. The open source and free programming language R is a phenomenal mechanism to address a multiplicity of challenges in ecology and evolution. It is also a complex ecosystem because of the diversity of solutions available to the analyst. 2. Packages for R enhance and specialize the capacity to explore both niche data/experiments and more common needs. However, the paradox of choice or how we select between many seemingly similar options can be overwhelming and lead to different potential outcomes. 3. There is extensive choice in ecology and evolution between packages for both fundamental statistics and for more specialized domain‐level analyses. 4. Here, we provide a checklist to inform these decisions based on the principles of resilience, need, and integration with scientific workflows for evidence. 5. It is important to explore choices in any analytical coding environment—not just R—for solutions to challenges in ecology and evolution, and document this process because it advances reproducible science, promotes a deeper understand of the scientific evidence, and ensures that the outcomes are correct, representative, and robust. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7029065/ /pubmed/32076500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5970 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution Lortie, Christopher J. Braun, Jenna Filazzola, Alessandro Miguel, Florencia A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title | A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title_full | A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title_fullStr | A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title_short | A checklist for choosing between R packages in ecology and evolution |
title_sort | checklist for choosing between r packages in ecology and evolution |
topic | Academic Practice in Ecology and Evolution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076500 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lortiechristopherj achecklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT braunjenna achecklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT filazzolaalessandro achecklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT miguelflorencia achecklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT lortiechristopherj checklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT braunjenna checklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT filazzolaalessandro checklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution AT miguelflorencia checklistforchoosingbetweenrpackagesinecologyandevolution |