Cargando…

Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape

Interspecific interactions are an integral aspect of ecosystem functioning that may be disrupted in an increasingly anthropocentric world. Industrial landscape change creates a novel playing field on which these interactions take place, and a key question for wildlife managers is whether and how spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tattersall, Erin R., Burgar, Joanna M., Fisher, Jason T., Burton, A. Cole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6028
_version_ 1783499095218847744
author Tattersall, Erin R.
Burgar, Joanna M.
Fisher, Jason T.
Burton, A. Cole
author_facet Tattersall, Erin R.
Burgar, Joanna M.
Fisher, Jason T.
Burton, A. Cole
author_sort Tattersall, Erin R.
collection PubMed
description Interspecific interactions are an integral aspect of ecosystem functioning that may be disrupted in an increasingly anthropocentric world. Industrial landscape change creates a novel playing field on which these interactions take place, and a key question for wildlife managers is whether and how species are able to coexist in such working landscapes. Using camera traps deployed in northern Alberta, we surveyed boreal predators to determine whether interspecific interactions affected occurrences of black bears (Ursus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and lynx (Lynx canadensis) within a landscape disturbed by networks of seismic lines (corridors cut for seismic exploration of oil and gas reserves). We tested hypotheses of species interactions across one spatial‐only and two spatiotemporal (daily and weekly) scales. Specifically, we hypothesized that (1) predators avoid competition with the apex predator, gray wolf (Canis lupus), (2) they avoid competition with each other as intraguild competitors, and (3) they overlap with their prey. All three predators overlapped with wolves on at least one scale, although models at the daily and weekly scale had substantial unexplained variance. None of the predators showed avoidance of intraguild competitors or overlap with prey. These results show patterns in predator space use that are consistent with both facilitative interactions or shared responses to unmeasured ecological cues. Our study provides insight into how predator species use the working boreal landscape in relation to each other, and highlights that predator management may indirectly influence multiple species through their interactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70290722020-02-19 Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape Tattersall, Erin R. Burgar, Joanna M. Fisher, Jason T. Burton, A. Cole Ecol Evol Original Research Interspecific interactions are an integral aspect of ecosystem functioning that may be disrupted in an increasingly anthropocentric world. Industrial landscape change creates a novel playing field on which these interactions take place, and a key question for wildlife managers is whether and how species are able to coexist in such working landscapes. Using camera traps deployed in northern Alberta, we surveyed boreal predators to determine whether interspecific interactions affected occurrences of black bears (Ursus americanus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and lynx (Lynx canadensis) within a landscape disturbed by networks of seismic lines (corridors cut for seismic exploration of oil and gas reserves). We tested hypotheses of species interactions across one spatial‐only and two spatiotemporal (daily and weekly) scales. Specifically, we hypothesized that (1) predators avoid competition with the apex predator, gray wolf (Canis lupus), (2) they avoid competition with each other as intraguild competitors, and (3) they overlap with their prey. All three predators overlapped with wolves on at least one scale, although models at the daily and weekly scale had substantial unexplained variance. None of the predators showed avoidance of intraguild competitors or overlap with prey. These results show patterns in predator space use that are consistent with both facilitative interactions or shared responses to unmeasured ecological cues. Our study provides insight into how predator species use the working boreal landscape in relation to each other, and highlights that predator management may indirectly influence multiple species through their interactions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7029072/ /pubmed/32076543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6028 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tattersall, Erin R.
Burgar, Joanna M.
Fisher, Jason T.
Burton, A. Cole
Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title_full Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title_fullStr Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title_full_unstemmed Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title_short Boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
title_sort boreal predator co‐occurrences reveal shared use of seismic lines in a working landscape
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6028
work_keys_str_mv AT tattersallerinr borealpredatorcooccurrencesrevealshareduseofseismiclinesinaworkinglandscape
AT burgarjoannam borealpredatorcooccurrencesrevealshareduseofseismiclinesinaworkinglandscape
AT fisherjasont borealpredatorcooccurrencesrevealshareduseofseismiclinesinaworkinglandscape
AT burtonacole borealpredatorcooccurrencesrevealshareduseofseismiclinesinaworkinglandscape