Cargando…

Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening

OBJECTIVES: Uptake of cervical screening among women aged 50–64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and dev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marlow, Laura A V, Ryan, Mairead, Waller, Jo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054120
_version_ 1783499126945611776
author Marlow, Laura A V
Ryan, Mairead
Waller, Jo
author_facet Marlow, Laura A V
Ryan, Mairead
Waller, Jo
author_sort Marlow, Laura A V
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Uptake of cervical screening among women aged 50–64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and developing cervical cancer would increase the relevance of screening in older women. METHODS: Women aged 50–64 years (n=597) who did not intend to go for screening were recruited through an online panel and randomised to one of three information conditions: cause only (basic information about HPV and cervical cancer), cause with basic timeline (also read a sentence describing the long interval between acquiring HPV and developing cervical cancer) and cause with explicit timeline (read the same as the timeline group alongside an explanation of what this means for older women). Perceived risk of cervical cancer, screening intention strength and understanding of HPV were assessed preinformation and postinformation exposure. RESULTS: Information condition was significantly associated with risk perceptions and intention strength postintervention (F(2,593)=6.26, p=0.002 and F(2,593)=4.98, p=0.007 respectively). Women in the cause with explicit timeline condition were more likely to increase their risk perceptions and intention strength compared with cause only (24% vs 9% and 25% vs 13% for risk perceptions and intention, respectively). In the cause with explicit timeline group, women with 4–10 lifetime partners had higher odds of increasing their perceived risk and intention strength postintervention compared with those with 0–1 partners (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.12 and OR=3.20, 95% CI 1.34 to 7.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Providing a clear explanation that decouples women’s perceived cervical cancer risk from their current sexual behaviour has the potential to increase perceived risk of cervical cancer and intentions to be screened among older women. Providing women with a clear cognitive representation of the aetiology of cervical cancer may be one approach to increasing screening uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70292432020-03-03 Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening Marlow, Laura A V Ryan, Mairead Waller, Jo Sex Transm Infect Education OBJECTIVES: Uptake of cervical screening among women aged 50–64 years is declining. Not feeling at risk because of current sexual behaviour is a reason some older women give for not being screened. We hypothesised that explaining the long interval between acquiring human papillomavirus (HPV) and developing cervical cancer would increase the relevance of screening in older women. METHODS: Women aged 50–64 years (n=597) who did not intend to go for screening were recruited through an online panel and randomised to one of three information conditions: cause only (basic information about HPV and cervical cancer), cause with basic timeline (also read a sentence describing the long interval between acquiring HPV and developing cervical cancer) and cause with explicit timeline (read the same as the timeline group alongside an explanation of what this means for older women). Perceived risk of cervical cancer, screening intention strength and understanding of HPV were assessed preinformation and postinformation exposure. RESULTS: Information condition was significantly associated with risk perceptions and intention strength postintervention (F(2,593)=6.26, p=0.002 and F(2,593)=4.98, p=0.007 respectively). Women in the cause with explicit timeline condition were more likely to increase their risk perceptions and intention strength compared with cause only (24% vs 9% and 25% vs 13% for risk perceptions and intention, respectively). In the cause with explicit timeline group, women with 4–10 lifetime partners had higher odds of increasing their perceived risk and intention strength postintervention compared with those with 0–1 partners (OR=2.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.12 and OR=3.20, 95% CI 1.34 to 7.67, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Providing a clear explanation that decouples women’s perceived cervical cancer risk from their current sexual behaviour has the potential to increase perceived risk of cervical cancer and intentions to be screened among older women. Providing women with a clear cognitive representation of the aetiology of cervical cancer may be one approach to increasing screening uptake. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-02 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7029243/ /pubmed/31395750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054120 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Education
Marlow, Laura A V
Ryan, Mairead
Waller, Jo
Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title_full Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title_fullStr Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title_short Increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
title_sort increasing the perceived relevance of cervical screening in older women who do not plan to attend screening
topic Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31395750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2019-054120
work_keys_str_mv AT marlowlauraav increasingtheperceivedrelevanceofcervicalscreeninginolderwomenwhodonotplantoattendscreening
AT ryanmairead increasingtheperceivedrelevanceofcervicalscreeninginolderwomenwhodonotplantoattendscreening
AT wallerjo increasingtheperceivedrelevanceofcervicalscreeninginolderwomenwhodonotplantoattendscreening