Cargando…

PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study

OBJECTIVES: (i) Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a peer support intervention (PALS) to facilitate self-management in community dwelling older adults with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), and (ii) examine the feasibility of study methods in order to inform the design of a future randomised c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Kay, Schofield, Patricia, Smith, Blair H., Klein, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.015
_version_ 1783499134073831424
author Cooper, Kay
Schofield, Patricia
Smith, Blair H.
Klein, Susan
author_facet Cooper, Kay
Schofield, Patricia
Smith, Blair H.
Klein, Susan
author_sort Cooper, Kay
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: (i) Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a peer support intervention (PALS) to facilitate self-management in community dwelling older adults with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), and (ii) examine the feasibility of study methods in order to inform the design of a future randomised controlled trial. DESIGN: Mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 18 older adults (aged 65 to 79) with CLBP and 6 peer support volunteers (PSVs) aged 34 to 65. INTERVENTION: Six sessions of 1 to 3 hours duration, approximately 2 weeks apart, delivered in mutually convenient public places, or by telephone. Each session had a suggested topic and each participant and PSV had a PALS manual detailing aims and target outcomes for each session. OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, retention, integrity, acceptability and feasibility of the PALS intervention, feasibility of study processes, appropriateness and usefulness of outcome measures. RESULTS: We recruited to target and retained 2/3 of participants. PALS was delivered as intended and acceptable to people with CLBP and PSVs. Most participants were satisfied with PALS and would recommend it to someone else with CLBP. Study processes worked well, but recruitment procedures need to be refined. Outcome measures were returned and were mostly complete, but further work on the most appropriate measures is required. CONCLUSIONS: PALS was feasible to deliver and acceptable to the older people and PSVs who took part in this study. We identified amendments to PALS and the study processes that, once implemented, will allow the effectiveness of PALS to be tested in a large-scale study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70292742020-03-01 PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study Cooper, Kay Schofield, Patricia Smith, Blair H. Klein, Susan Physiotherapy Article OBJECTIVES: (i) Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a peer support intervention (PALS) to facilitate self-management in community dwelling older adults with Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP), and (ii) examine the feasibility of study methods in order to inform the design of a future randomised controlled trial. DESIGN: Mixed methods feasibility and acceptability study. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: 18 older adults (aged 65 to 79) with CLBP and 6 peer support volunteers (PSVs) aged 34 to 65. INTERVENTION: Six sessions of 1 to 3 hours duration, approximately 2 weeks apart, delivered in mutually convenient public places, or by telephone. Each session had a suggested topic and each participant and PSV had a PALS manual detailing aims and target outcomes for each session. OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, retention, integrity, acceptability and feasibility of the PALS intervention, feasibility of study processes, appropriateness and usefulness of outcome measures. RESULTS: We recruited to target and retained 2/3 of participants. PALS was delivered as intended and acceptable to people with CLBP and PSVs. Most participants were satisfied with PALS and would recommend it to someone else with CLBP. Study processes worked well, but recruitment procedures need to be refined. Outcome measures were returned and were mostly complete, but further work on the most appropriate measures is required. CONCLUSIONS: PALS was feasible to deliver and acceptable to the older people and PSVs who took part in this study. We identified amendments to PALS and the study processes that, once implemented, will allow the effectiveness of PALS to be tested in a large-scale study. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy London 2020-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7029274/ /pubmed/30928147 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.015 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cooper, Kay
Schofield, Patricia
Smith, Blair H.
Klein, Susan
PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_full PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_fullStr PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_full_unstemmed PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_short PALS: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
title_sort pals: peer support for community dwelling older people with chronic low back pain: a feasibility and acceptability study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928147
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.015
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperkay palspeersupportforcommunitydwellingolderpeoplewithchroniclowbackpainafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT schofieldpatricia palspeersupportforcommunitydwellingolderpeoplewithchroniclowbackpainafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT smithblairh palspeersupportforcommunitydwellingolderpeoplewithchroniclowbackpainafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy
AT kleinsusan palspeersupportforcommunitydwellingolderpeoplewithchroniclowbackpainafeasibilityandacceptabilitystudy