Cargando…

A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration

INTRODUCTION: Misoprostol (Cytotec) was primarily made for treating gastric ulcers. However today it is mostly used for abortion, treating postpartum hemorrhage, and for induction of labor. The tablet contains 200 µg of misoprostol, yet the dosages used for induction of labor are much smaller (25–50...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amini, Mahdi, Reis, Margareta, Wide-Swensson, Dag
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00050
_version_ 1783499230971691008
author Amini, Mahdi
Reis, Margareta
Wide-Swensson, Dag
author_facet Amini, Mahdi
Reis, Margareta
Wide-Swensson, Dag
author_sort Amini, Mahdi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Misoprostol (Cytotec) was primarily made for treating gastric ulcers. However today it is mostly used for abortion, treating postpartum hemorrhage, and for induction of labor. The tablet contains 200 µg of misoprostol, yet the dosages used for induction of labor are much smaller (25–50 µg), leading to uncertainty of dosage in daily use. AIM: To evaluate and compare the relative bioavailability of two misoprostol products (Angusta 25 µg and Cytotec 200 µg tablets) administered orally or sublingually given in a daily clinical setting to women admitted for induction of labor at term. METHODS: Women carrying a live, singleton fetus in a cephalic position and with a gestational age between 259 and 296 days were included. Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. A serum analytical assay was performed and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Patients were assigned to one of three groups. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. No significant differences demographic characteristics were found. The ratios for AUC, AUC ((0−t)), and C(max) were similar in all three groups, but CI-values were outside the required 80–125%. Sublingual administration yielded a 20–30% higher bioavailability and a 50% higher C(max) than compared to the oral route. CONCLUSION: The relative bioavailability between Angusta and Cytotec could not be confirmed as being equal at the 25 µg or 50 µg level because the 90% CI-values when comparing the ratios for AUC, AUC((0−t)), and C(max) were wider than accepted. The reason for this could be the real-life, non-standardized circumstances in which the study was conducted. Sublingual administration seems to have higher bioavailability than oral administration. More studies are needed to ascertain an optimal dosage regime balancing both safety and efficacy for mother and child. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02516631.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029744
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70297442020-02-28 A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration Amini, Mahdi Reis, Margareta Wide-Swensson, Dag Front Pharmacol Pharmacology INTRODUCTION: Misoprostol (Cytotec) was primarily made for treating gastric ulcers. However today it is mostly used for abortion, treating postpartum hemorrhage, and for induction of labor. The tablet contains 200 µg of misoprostol, yet the dosages used for induction of labor are much smaller (25–50 µg), leading to uncertainty of dosage in daily use. AIM: To evaluate and compare the relative bioavailability of two misoprostol products (Angusta 25 µg and Cytotec 200 µg tablets) administered orally or sublingually given in a daily clinical setting to women admitted for induction of labor at term. METHODS: Women carrying a live, singleton fetus in a cephalic position and with a gestational age between 259 and 296 days were included. Blood samples were collected at 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 75, 100, 120, 180, and 240 minutes. A serum analytical assay was performed and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. Patients were assigned to one of three groups. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients were included. No significant differences demographic characteristics were found. The ratios for AUC, AUC ((0−t)), and C(max) were similar in all three groups, but CI-values were outside the required 80–125%. Sublingual administration yielded a 20–30% higher bioavailability and a 50% higher C(max) than compared to the oral route. CONCLUSION: The relative bioavailability between Angusta and Cytotec could not be confirmed as being equal at the 25 µg or 50 µg level because the 90% CI-values when comparing the ratios for AUC, AUC((0−t)), and C(max) were wider than accepted. The reason for this could be the real-life, non-standardized circumstances in which the study was conducted. Sublingual administration seems to have higher bioavailability than oral administration. More studies are needed to ascertain an optimal dosage regime balancing both safety and efficacy for mother and child. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02516631. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7029744/ /pubmed/32116725 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00050 Text en Copyright © 2020 Amini, Reis and Wide-Swensson http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Amini, Mahdi
Reis, Margareta
Wide-Swensson, Dag
A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title_full A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title_fullStr A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title_full_unstemmed A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title_short A Relative Bioavailability Study of Two Misoprostol Formulations Following a Single Oral or Sublingual Administration
title_sort relative bioavailability study of two misoprostol formulations following a single oral or sublingual administration
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116725
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00050
work_keys_str_mv AT aminimahdi arelativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration
AT reismargareta arelativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration
AT wideswenssondag arelativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration
AT aminimahdi relativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration
AT reismargareta relativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration
AT wideswenssondag relativebioavailabilitystudyoftwomisoprostolformulationsfollowingasingleoralorsublingualadministration