Cargando…

A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology

The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clarkson, Tessa R., Sidari, Morgan J., Sains, Rosanna, Alexander, Meredith, Harrison, Melissa, Mefodeva, Valeriya, Pearson, Samuel, Lee, Anthony J., Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209
_version_ 1783499252770537472
author Clarkson, Tessa R.
Sidari, Morgan J.
Sains, Rosanna
Alexander, Meredith
Harrison, Melissa
Mefodeva, Valeriya
Pearson, Samuel
Lee, Anthony J.
Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
author_facet Clarkson, Tessa R.
Sidari, Morgan J.
Sains, Rosanna
Alexander, Meredith
Harrison, Melissa
Mefodeva, Valeriya
Pearson, Samuel
Lee, Anthony J.
Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
author_sort Clarkson, Tessa R.
collection PubMed
description The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-term partners owing to lower paternal investment. Mating strategy theory suggests women's preferences for masculine traits are strongest when the costs associated with masculinity are reduced. This study takes a multivariate approach to testing whether women's mate preferences are context-dependent. Women (n = 919) rated attractiveness when considering long-term and short-term relationships for male faces varying in beardedness (clean-shaven and full beards) and facial masculinity (30% and 60% feminized, unmanipulated, 30% and 60% masculinized). Participants then completed scales measuring pathogen, sexual and moral disgust, disgust towards ectoparasites, reproductive ambition, self-perceived mate value and the facial hair in partners and fathers. In contrast to past research, we found no associations between pathogen disgust, self-perceived mate value or reproductive ambition and facial masculinity preferences. However, we found a significant positive association between moral disgust and preferences for masculine faces and bearded faces. Preferences for beards were lower among women with higher ectoparasite disgust, providing evidence for ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis. However, women reporting higher pathogen disgust gave higher attractiveness ratings for bearded faces than women reporting lower pathogen disgust, providing support for parasite-stress theories of sexual selection and mate choice. Preferences for beards were also highest among single and married women with the strongest reproductive ambition. Overall, our results reflect mixed associations between individual differences in mating strategies and women's mate preferences for masculine facial traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70298992020-03-26 A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology Clarkson, Tessa R. Sidari, Morgan J. Sains, Rosanna Alexander, Meredith Harrison, Melissa Mefodeva, Valeriya Pearson, Samuel Lee, Anthony J. Dixson, Barnaby J. W. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-term partners owing to lower paternal investment. Mating strategy theory suggests women's preferences for masculine traits are strongest when the costs associated with masculinity are reduced. This study takes a multivariate approach to testing whether women's mate preferences are context-dependent. Women (n = 919) rated attractiveness when considering long-term and short-term relationships for male faces varying in beardedness (clean-shaven and full beards) and facial masculinity (30% and 60% feminized, unmanipulated, 30% and 60% masculinized). Participants then completed scales measuring pathogen, sexual and moral disgust, disgust towards ectoparasites, reproductive ambition, self-perceived mate value and the facial hair in partners and fathers. In contrast to past research, we found no associations between pathogen disgust, self-perceived mate value or reproductive ambition and facial masculinity preferences. However, we found a significant positive association between moral disgust and preferences for masculine faces and bearded faces. Preferences for beards were lower among women with higher ectoparasite disgust, providing evidence for ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis. However, women reporting higher pathogen disgust gave higher attractiveness ratings for bearded faces than women reporting lower pathogen disgust, providing support for parasite-stress theories of sexual selection and mate choice. Preferences for beards were also highest among single and married women with the strongest reproductive ambition. Overall, our results reflect mixed associations between individual differences in mating strategies and women's mate preferences for masculine facial traits. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7029899/ /pubmed/32218951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Clarkson, Tessa R.
Sidari, Morgan J.
Sains, Rosanna
Alexander, Meredith
Harrison, Melissa
Mefodeva, Valeriya
Pearson, Samuel
Lee, Anthony J.
Dixson, Barnaby J. W.
A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title_full A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title_fullStr A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title_full_unstemmed A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title_short A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
title_sort multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209
work_keys_str_mv AT clarksontessar amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT sidarimorganj amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT sainsrosanna amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT alexandermeredith amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT harrisonmelissa amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT mefodevavaleriya amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT pearsonsamuel amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT leeanthonyj amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT dixsonbarnabyjw amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT clarksontessar multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT sidarimorganj multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT sainsrosanna multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT alexandermeredith multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT harrisonmelissa multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT mefodevavaleriya multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT pearsonsamuel multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT leeanthonyj multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology
AT dixsonbarnabyjw multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology