Cargando…
A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology
The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209 |
_version_ | 1783499252770537472 |
---|---|
author | Clarkson, Tessa R. Sidari, Morgan J. Sains, Rosanna Alexander, Meredith Harrison, Melissa Mefodeva, Valeriya Pearson, Samuel Lee, Anthony J. Dixson, Barnaby J. W. |
author_facet | Clarkson, Tessa R. Sidari, Morgan J. Sains, Rosanna Alexander, Meredith Harrison, Melissa Mefodeva, Valeriya Pearson, Samuel Lee, Anthony J. Dixson, Barnaby J. W. |
author_sort | Clarkson, Tessa R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-term partners owing to lower paternal investment. Mating strategy theory suggests women's preferences for masculine traits are strongest when the costs associated with masculinity are reduced. This study takes a multivariate approach to testing whether women's mate preferences are context-dependent. Women (n = 919) rated attractiveness when considering long-term and short-term relationships for male faces varying in beardedness (clean-shaven and full beards) and facial masculinity (30% and 60% feminized, unmanipulated, 30% and 60% masculinized). Participants then completed scales measuring pathogen, sexual and moral disgust, disgust towards ectoparasites, reproductive ambition, self-perceived mate value and the facial hair in partners and fathers. In contrast to past research, we found no associations between pathogen disgust, self-perceived mate value or reproductive ambition and facial masculinity preferences. However, we found a significant positive association between moral disgust and preferences for masculine faces and bearded faces. Preferences for beards were lower among women with higher ectoparasite disgust, providing evidence for ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis. However, women reporting higher pathogen disgust gave higher attractiveness ratings for bearded faces than women reporting lower pathogen disgust, providing support for parasite-stress theories of sexual selection and mate choice. Preferences for beards were also highest among single and married women with the strongest reproductive ambition. Overall, our results reflect mixed associations between individual differences in mating strategies and women's mate preferences for masculine facial traits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7029899 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70298992020-03-26 A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology Clarkson, Tessa R. Sidari, Morgan J. Sains, Rosanna Alexander, Meredith Harrison, Melissa Mefodeva, Valeriya Pearson, Samuel Lee, Anthony J. Dixson, Barnaby J. W. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience The strength and direction of sexual selection via female choice on masculine facial traits in men is a paradox in human mate choice research. While masculinity may communicate benefits to women and offspring directly (i.e. resources) or indirectly (i.e. health), masculine men may be costly as long-term partners owing to lower paternal investment. Mating strategy theory suggests women's preferences for masculine traits are strongest when the costs associated with masculinity are reduced. This study takes a multivariate approach to testing whether women's mate preferences are context-dependent. Women (n = 919) rated attractiveness when considering long-term and short-term relationships for male faces varying in beardedness (clean-shaven and full beards) and facial masculinity (30% and 60% feminized, unmanipulated, 30% and 60% masculinized). Participants then completed scales measuring pathogen, sexual and moral disgust, disgust towards ectoparasites, reproductive ambition, self-perceived mate value and the facial hair in partners and fathers. In contrast to past research, we found no associations between pathogen disgust, self-perceived mate value or reproductive ambition and facial masculinity preferences. However, we found a significant positive association between moral disgust and preferences for masculine faces and bearded faces. Preferences for beards were lower among women with higher ectoparasite disgust, providing evidence for ectoparasite avoidance hypothesis. However, women reporting higher pathogen disgust gave higher attractiveness ratings for bearded faces than women reporting lower pathogen disgust, providing support for parasite-stress theories of sexual selection and mate choice. Preferences for beards were also highest among single and married women with the strongest reproductive ambition. Overall, our results reflect mixed associations between individual differences in mating strategies and women's mate preferences for masculine facial traits. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7029899/ /pubmed/32218951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Clarkson, Tessa R. Sidari, Morgan J. Sains, Rosanna Alexander, Meredith Harrison, Melissa Mefodeva, Valeriya Pearson, Samuel Lee, Anthony J. Dixson, Barnaby J. W. A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title | A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title_full | A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title_fullStr | A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title_full_unstemmed | A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title_short | A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
title_sort | multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology |
topic | Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029899/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191209 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarksontessar amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT sidarimorganj amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT sainsrosanna amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT alexandermeredith amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT harrisonmelissa amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT mefodevavaleriya amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT pearsonsamuel amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT leeanthonyj amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT dixsonbarnabyjw amultivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT clarksontessar multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT sidarimorganj multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT sainsrosanna multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT alexandermeredith multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT harrisonmelissa multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT mefodevavaleriya multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT pearsonsamuel multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT leeanthonyj multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology AT dixsonbarnabyjw multivariateanalysisofwomensmatingstrategiesandsexualselectiononmensfacialmorphology |