Cargando…
Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824 |
_version_ | 1783499255032315904 |
---|---|
author | Kaler, Jasmeet Mitsch, Jurgen Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A. Bollard, Nicola Dottorini, Tania Ellis, Keith A. |
author_facet | Kaler, Jasmeet Mitsch, Jurgen Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A. Bollard, Nicola Dottorini, Tania Ellis, Keith A. |
author_sort | Kaler, Jasmeet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity studies and their use is becoming increasingly common in livestock. In this study, we used 23 datasets (10 non-lame and 13 lame sheep) from an accelerometer- and gyroscope-based ear sensor with a sampling frequency of 16 Hz to develop and compare algorithms that can differentiate lameness within three different activities (walking, standing and lying). We show for the first time that features extracted from accelerometer and gyroscope signals can differentiate between lame and non-lame sheep while standing, walking and lying. The random forest algorithm performed best for classifying lameness with an accuracy of 84.91% within lying, 81.15% within standing and 76.83% within walking and overall correctly classified over 80% sheep within activities. Both accelerometer- and gyroscope-based features ranked among the top 10 features for classification. Our results suggest that novel behavioural differences between lame and non-lame sheep across all three activities could be used to develop an automated system for lameness detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7029909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70299092020-03-26 Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep Kaler, Jasmeet Mitsch, Jurgen Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A. Bollard, Nicola Dottorini, Tania Ellis, Keith A. R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity studies and their use is becoming increasingly common in livestock. In this study, we used 23 datasets (10 non-lame and 13 lame sheep) from an accelerometer- and gyroscope-based ear sensor with a sampling frequency of 16 Hz to develop and compare algorithms that can differentiate lameness within three different activities (walking, standing and lying). We show for the first time that features extracted from accelerometer and gyroscope signals can differentiate between lame and non-lame sheep while standing, walking and lying. The random forest algorithm performed best for classifying lameness with an accuracy of 84.91% within lying, 81.15% within standing and 76.83% within walking and overall correctly classified over 80% sheep within activities. Both accelerometer- and gyroscope-based features ranked among the top 10 features for classification. Our results suggest that novel behavioural differences between lame and non-lame sheep across all three activities could be used to develop an automated system for lameness detection. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7029909/ /pubmed/32218931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Kaler, Jasmeet Mitsch, Jurgen Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A. Bollard, Nicola Dottorini, Tania Ellis, Keith A. Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title | Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title_full | Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title_fullStr | Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title_short | Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
title_sort | automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep |
topic | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kalerjasmeet automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep AT mitschjurgen automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep AT vazquezdiosdadojorgea automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep AT bollardnicola automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep AT dottorinitania automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep AT elliskeitha automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep |