Cargando…

Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep

Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaler, Jasmeet, Mitsch, Jurgen, Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A., Bollard, Nicola, Dottorini, Tania, Ellis, Keith A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824
_version_ 1783499255032315904
author Kaler, Jasmeet
Mitsch, Jurgen
Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A.
Bollard, Nicola
Dottorini, Tania
Ellis, Keith A.
author_facet Kaler, Jasmeet
Mitsch, Jurgen
Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A.
Bollard, Nicola
Dottorini, Tania
Ellis, Keith A.
author_sort Kaler, Jasmeet
collection PubMed
description Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity studies and their use is becoming increasingly common in livestock. In this study, we used 23 datasets (10 non-lame and 13 lame sheep) from an accelerometer- and gyroscope-based ear sensor with a sampling frequency of 16 Hz to develop and compare algorithms that can differentiate lameness within three different activities (walking, standing and lying). We show for the first time that features extracted from accelerometer and gyroscope signals can differentiate between lame and non-lame sheep while standing, walking and lying. The random forest algorithm performed best for classifying lameness with an accuracy of 84.91% within lying, 81.15% within standing and 76.83% within walking and overall correctly classified over 80% sheep within activities. Both accelerometer- and gyroscope-based features ranked among the top 10 features for classification. Our results suggest that novel behavioural differences between lame and non-lame sheep across all three activities could be used to develop an automated system for lameness detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7029909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70299092020-03-26 Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep Kaler, Jasmeet Mitsch, Jurgen Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A. Bollard, Nicola Dottorini, Tania Ellis, Keith A. R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Lameness in sheep is the biggest cause of concern regarding poor health and welfare among sheep-producing countries. Best practice for lameness relies on rapid treatment, yet there are no objective measures of lameness detection. Accelerometers and gyroscopes have been widely used in human activity studies and their use is becoming increasingly common in livestock. In this study, we used 23 datasets (10 non-lame and 13 lame sheep) from an accelerometer- and gyroscope-based ear sensor with a sampling frequency of 16 Hz to develop and compare algorithms that can differentiate lameness within three different activities (walking, standing and lying). We show for the first time that features extracted from accelerometer and gyroscope signals can differentiate between lame and non-lame sheep while standing, walking and lying. The random forest algorithm performed best for classifying lameness with an accuracy of 84.91% within lying, 81.15% within standing and 76.83% within walking and overall correctly classified over 80% sheep within activities. Both accelerometer- and gyroscope-based features ranked among the top 10 features for classification. Our results suggest that novel behavioural differences between lame and non-lame sheep across all three activities could be used to develop an automated system for lameness detection. The Royal Society 2020-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7029909/ /pubmed/32218931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Kaler, Jasmeet
Mitsch, Jurgen
Vázquez-Diosdado, Jorge A.
Bollard, Nicola
Dottorini, Tania
Ellis, Keith A.
Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title_full Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title_fullStr Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title_full_unstemmed Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title_short Automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
title_sort automated detection of lameness in sheep using machine learning approaches: novel insights into behavioural differences among lame and non-lame sheep
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7029909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190824
work_keys_str_mv AT kalerjasmeet automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep
AT mitschjurgen automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep
AT vazquezdiosdadojorgea automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep
AT bollardnicola automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep
AT dottorinitania automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep
AT elliskeitha automateddetectionoflamenessinsheepusingmachinelearningapproachesnovelinsightsintobehaviouraldifferencesamonglameandnonlamesheep