Cargando…

Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study

Little is known about the determinants of collective efficacy, a neighborhood social process comprised of social cohesion and social control, which has shown to be beneficially associated with health. Our goal was to identify determinants of collective efficacy, social cohesion and social control. W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pabayo, Roman, Grinshteyn, Erin, Avila, Oliva, Azrael, Deborah, Molnar, Beth E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7030982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100552
_version_ 1783499284223623168
author Pabayo, Roman
Grinshteyn, Erin
Avila, Oliva
Azrael, Deborah
Molnar, Beth E.
author_facet Pabayo, Roman
Grinshteyn, Erin
Avila, Oliva
Azrael, Deborah
Molnar, Beth E.
author_sort Pabayo, Roman
collection PubMed
description Little is known about the determinants of collective efficacy, a neighborhood social process comprised of social cohesion and social control, which has shown to be beneficially associated with health. Our goal was to identify determinants of collective efficacy, social cohesion and social control. We used data collected from the Boston Neighborhood Survey, a cross-sectional survey conducted in 38 Boston neighborhoods in 2010 (n = 1710). We used multi-level logistic regression analyses to identify the relationship between the neighborhood-level characteristics and collective efficacy, social cohesion, and social control. High social fragmentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting high collective efficacy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54,0.95). and high social cohesion (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46, 0.86). High social fragmentation (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.64, 0.99), and moderate economic deprivation (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47, 0.88) were associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting high social control, while high trust in police was associated with an increased likelihood in reporting high social control (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.16, 3.00). Further research should be undertaken to better understand the direction of effect of these associations and how interventions to promote social processes can utilize these findings to improve health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7030982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70309822020-02-25 Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study Pabayo, Roman Grinshteyn, Erin Avila, Oliva Azrael, Deborah Molnar, Beth E. SSM Popul Health Article Little is known about the determinants of collective efficacy, a neighborhood social process comprised of social cohesion and social control, which has shown to be beneficially associated with health. Our goal was to identify determinants of collective efficacy, social cohesion and social control. We used data collected from the Boston Neighborhood Survey, a cross-sectional survey conducted in 38 Boston neighborhoods in 2010 (n = 1710). We used multi-level logistic regression analyses to identify the relationship between the neighborhood-level characteristics and collective efficacy, social cohesion, and social control. High social fragmentation was associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting high collective efficacy (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.54,0.95). and high social cohesion (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.46, 0.86). High social fragmentation (OR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.64, 0.99), and moderate economic deprivation (OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.47, 0.88) were associated with a decreased likelihood of reporting high social control, while high trust in police was associated with an increased likelihood in reporting high social control (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.16, 3.00). Further research should be undertaken to better understand the direction of effect of these associations and how interventions to promote social processes can utilize these findings to improve health. Elsevier 2020-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7030982/ /pubmed/32099894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100552 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pabayo, Roman
Grinshteyn, Erin
Avila, Oliva
Azrael, Deborah
Molnar, Beth E.
Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title_full Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title_fullStr Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title_full_unstemmed Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title_short Relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: Findings from the Boston Neighborhood Study
title_sort relation between neighborhood socio-economic characteristics and social cohesion, social control, and collective efficacy: findings from the boston neighborhood study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7030982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100552
work_keys_str_mv AT pabayoroman relationbetweenneighborhoodsocioeconomiccharacteristicsandsocialcohesionsocialcontrolandcollectiveefficacyfindingsfromthebostonneighborhoodstudy
AT grinshteynerin relationbetweenneighborhoodsocioeconomiccharacteristicsandsocialcohesionsocialcontrolandcollectiveefficacyfindingsfromthebostonneighborhoodstudy
AT avilaoliva relationbetweenneighborhoodsocioeconomiccharacteristicsandsocialcohesionsocialcontrolandcollectiveefficacyfindingsfromthebostonneighborhoodstudy
AT azraeldeborah relationbetweenneighborhoodsocioeconomiccharacteristicsandsocialcohesionsocialcontrolandcollectiveefficacyfindingsfromthebostonneighborhoodstudy
AT molnarbethe relationbetweenneighborhoodsocioeconomiccharacteristicsandsocialcohesionsocialcontrolandcollectiveefficacyfindingsfromthebostonneighborhoodstudy