Cargando…

Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues

Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is highly effective in foxes and raccoon dogs, whereas for unknown reasons the efficacy of ORV in other reservoir species is less pronounced. To investigate possible variations in species-specific cell tropism and local replication of vaccine virus, different reservoir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: te Kamp, Verena, Freuling, Conrad M., Vos, Ad, Schuster, Peter, Kaiser, Christian, Ortmann, Steffen, Kretzschmar, Antje, Nemitz, Sabine, Eggerbauer, Elisa, Ulrich, Reiner, Schinköthe, Jan, Nolden, Tobias, Müller, Thomas, Finke, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59719-4
_version_ 1783499356441149440
author te Kamp, Verena
Freuling, Conrad M.
Vos, Ad
Schuster, Peter
Kaiser, Christian
Ortmann, Steffen
Kretzschmar, Antje
Nemitz, Sabine
Eggerbauer, Elisa
Ulrich, Reiner
Schinköthe, Jan
Nolden, Tobias
Müller, Thomas
Finke, Stefan
author_facet te Kamp, Verena
Freuling, Conrad M.
Vos, Ad
Schuster, Peter
Kaiser, Christian
Ortmann, Steffen
Kretzschmar, Antje
Nemitz, Sabine
Eggerbauer, Elisa
Ulrich, Reiner
Schinköthe, Jan
Nolden, Tobias
Müller, Thomas
Finke, Stefan
author_sort te Kamp, Verena
collection PubMed
description Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is highly effective in foxes and raccoon dogs, whereas for unknown reasons the efficacy of ORV in other reservoir species is less pronounced. To investigate possible variations in species-specific cell tropism and local replication of vaccine virus, different reservoir species including foxes, raccoon dogs, raccoons, mongooses, dogs and skunks were orally immunised with a highly attenuated, high-titred GFP-expressing rabies virus (RABV). Immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR screenings revealed clear differences among species suggesting host specific limitations to ORV. While for responsive species the palatine tonsils (tonsilla palatina) were identified as a main site of virus replication, less virus dissemination was observed in the tonsils of rather refractory species. While our comparison of vaccine virus tropism emphasizes the important role that the tonsilla palatina plays in eliciting an immune response to ORV, our data also indicate that other lymphoid tissues may have a more important role than originally anticipated. Overall, these data support a model in which the susceptibility to oral live RABV vaccine infection of lymphatic tissue is a major determinant in vaccination efficacy. The present results may help to direct future research for improving vaccine uptake and efficacy of oral rabies vaccines under field conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70313382020-02-27 Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues te Kamp, Verena Freuling, Conrad M. Vos, Ad Schuster, Peter Kaiser, Christian Ortmann, Steffen Kretzschmar, Antje Nemitz, Sabine Eggerbauer, Elisa Ulrich, Reiner Schinköthe, Jan Nolden, Tobias Müller, Thomas Finke, Stefan Sci Rep Article Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is highly effective in foxes and raccoon dogs, whereas for unknown reasons the efficacy of ORV in other reservoir species is less pronounced. To investigate possible variations in species-specific cell tropism and local replication of vaccine virus, different reservoir species including foxes, raccoon dogs, raccoons, mongooses, dogs and skunks were orally immunised with a highly attenuated, high-titred GFP-expressing rabies virus (RABV). Immunofluorescence and RT-qPCR screenings revealed clear differences among species suggesting host specific limitations to ORV. While for responsive species the palatine tonsils (tonsilla palatina) were identified as a main site of virus replication, less virus dissemination was observed in the tonsils of rather refractory species. While our comparison of vaccine virus tropism emphasizes the important role that the tonsilla palatina plays in eliciting an immune response to ORV, our data also indicate that other lymphoid tissues may have a more important role than originally anticipated. Overall, these data support a model in which the susceptibility to oral live RABV vaccine infection of lymphatic tissue is a major determinant in vaccination efficacy. The present results may help to direct future research for improving vaccine uptake and efficacy of oral rabies vaccines under field conditions. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031338/ /pubmed/32076025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59719-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
te Kamp, Verena
Freuling, Conrad M.
Vos, Ad
Schuster, Peter
Kaiser, Christian
Ortmann, Steffen
Kretzschmar, Antje
Nemitz, Sabine
Eggerbauer, Elisa
Ulrich, Reiner
Schinköthe, Jan
Nolden, Tobias
Müller, Thomas
Finke, Stefan
Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title_full Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title_fullStr Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title_short Responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
title_sort responsiveness of various reservoir species to oral rabies vaccination correlates with differences in vaccine uptake of mucosa associated lymphoid tissues
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031338/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32076025
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59719-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tekampverena responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT freulingconradm responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT vosad responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT schusterpeter responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT kaiserchristian responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT ortmannsteffen responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT kretzschmarantje responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT nemitzsabine responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT eggerbauerelisa responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT ulrichreiner responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT schinkothejan responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT noldentobias responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT mullerthomas responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues
AT finkestefan responsivenessofvariousreservoirspeciestooralrabiesvaccinationcorrelateswithdifferencesinvaccineuptakeofmucosaassociatedlymphoidtissues