Cargando…

A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the association of A‐kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) with chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1/CXCL2, and further investigate their correlation with clinical features and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Totally 160 de novo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hao, Xiaohong, Gu, Mianmian, Sun, Jie, Cong, Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23052
_version_ 1783499415867097088
author Hao, Xiaohong
Gu, Mianmian
Sun, Jie
Cong, Lin
author_facet Hao, Xiaohong
Gu, Mianmian
Sun, Jie
Cong, Lin
author_sort Hao, Xiaohong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the association of A‐kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) with chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1/CXCL2, and further investigate their correlation with clinical features and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Totally 160 de novo AML patients were recruited, and their bone marrow samples were collected before treatment for detecting the expressions of AKIP1, CXCL1, and CXCL2 by the quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Complete remission (CR) was assessed after induction treatment, and event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS: AKIP1 expression was positively associated with CXCL1 (P < .001) and CXCL2 expression (P < .001). AKIP1 high expression was correlated with FAB classification (P = .022), monosomal karyotype (P = .001), and poor risk stratification (P = .013), while CXCL2 high expression was associated with monosomal karyotype (P = .001). As for treatment response, AKIP1 high expression exhibited a trend to be increased in non‐CR patients compared with CR patients, while without statistical significance (P = .105). However, no correlation of CXCL1 (P = .418) or CXCL2 (P = .685) with CR achievement was observed. Most importantly, AKIP1 and CXCL1 were negatively correlated with accumulating EFS and OS (all P < .05), while CXCL2 only showed a trend to be negatively associated with accumulating EFS (P = .069) and OS (P = .055; but without statistical significance). CONCLUSION: AKIP1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse AML prognosis through the interaction of CXCL1/CXCL2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70316272020-02-27 A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia Hao, Xiaohong Gu, Mianmian Sun, Jie Cong, Lin J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the association of A‐kinase interacting protein 1 (AKIP1) with chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand (CXCL) 1/CXCL2, and further investigate their correlation with clinical features and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. METHODS: Totally 160 de novo AML patients were recruited, and their bone marrow samples were collected before treatment for detecting the expressions of AKIP1, CXCL1, and CXCL2 by the quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Complete remission (CR) was assessed after induction treatment, and event‐free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated. RESULTS: AKIP1 expression was positively associated with CXCL1 (P < .001) and CXCL2 expression (P < .001). AKIP1 high expression was correlated with FAB classification (P = .022), monosomal karyotype (P = .001), and poor risk stratification (P = .013), while CXCL2 high expression was associated with monosomal karyotype (P = .001). As for treatment response, AKIP1 high expression exhibited a trend to be increased in non‐CR patients compared with CR patients, while without statistical significance (P = .105). However, no correlation of CXCL1 (P = .418) or CXCL2 (P = .685) with CR achievement was observed. Most importantly, AKIP1 and CXCL1 were negatively correlated with accumulating EFS and OS (all P < .05), while CXCL2 only showed a trend to be negatively associated with accumulating EFS (P = .069) and OS (P = .055; but without statistical significance). CONCLUSION: AKIP1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse AML prognosis through the interaction of CXCL1/CXCL2. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7031627/ /pubmed/31617252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23052 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hao, Xiaohong
Gu, Mianmian
Sun, Jie
Cong, Lin
A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title_full A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title_fullStr A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title_full_unstemmed A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title_short A‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 1/chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
title_sort a‐kinase interacting protein 1 might serve as a novel biomarker for worse prognosis through the interaction of chemokine (c‐x‐c motif) ligand 1/chemokine (c‐x‐c motif) ligand 2 in acute myeloid leukemia
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31617252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23052
work_keys_str_mv AT haoxiaohong akinaseinteractingprotein1mightserveasanovelbiomarkerforworseprognosisthroughtheinteractionofchemokinecxcmotifligand1chemokinecxcmotifligand2inacutemyeloidleukemia
AT gumianmian akinaseinteractingprotein1mightserveasanovelbiomarkerforworseprognosisthroughtheinteractionofchemokinecxcmotifligand1chemokinecxcmotifligand2inacutemyeloidleukemia
AT sunjie akinaseinteractingprotein1mightserveasanovelbiomarkerforworseprognosisthroughtheinteractionofchemokinecxcmotifligand1chemokinecxcmotifligand2inacutemyeloidleukemia
AT conglin akinaseinteractingprotein1mightserveasanovelbiomarkerforworseprognosisthroughtheinteractionofchemokinecxcmotifligand1chemokinecxcmotifligand2inacutemyeloidleukemia