Cargando…

Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are the most common reason for sick leave in Sweden. Knowledge about effective methods to help these individuals to return to work (RTW)/entry into work or studies is limited. Rehabilitation coordinators (RC’s) have been introduced within healthcare with the purpose to p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersén, Åsa, Berglund, Erik, Anderzén, Ingrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8238-3
_version_ 1783499466999857152
author Andersén, Åsa
Berglund, Erik
Anderzén, Ingrid
author_facet Andersén, Åsa
Berglund, Erik
Anderzén, Ingrid
author_sort Andersén, Åsa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are the most common reason for sick leave in Sweden. Knowledge about effective methods to help these individuals to return to work (RTW)/entry into work or studies is limited. Rehabilitation coordinators (RC’s) have been introduced within healthcare with the purpose to promote cooperation, streamline the sick leave and rehabilitation process, and facilitate RTW for sick-listed patients. The function of RC’s has shown positive results by reducing sick leave within primary healthcare. However, the function has not been evaluated in terms of specialist psychiatry. This paper describes the design of a study to evaluate effects of a RC intervention on sick leave and RTW/entry in work or studies in patients with moderate to severe affective and/or moderate to severe anxiety disorders within specialist psychiatric care. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing an intervention group receiving support from a RC with a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The target group is patients on sick leave, treated for affective and/or anxiety disorder, aged 25–64, with or without employment. DISCUSSION: This study gives the possibility to evaluate a RC intervention for individuals with mental disorders. If the study has promising vocational outcomes, it may be of importance for the participants in many ways, e.g. increase participation in society, provide economic benefits and improve health and wellbeing. This would be valuable for the individual as well as for the society. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov Register Platform (ID NCT03729050) in 2 November 2018.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70319092020-02-25 Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial Andersén, Åsa Berglund, Erik Anderzén, Ingrid BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Mental disorders are the most common reason for sick leave in Sweden. Knowledge about effective methods to help these individuals to return to work (RTW)/entry into work or studies is limited. Rehabilitation coordinators (RC’s) have been introduced within healthcare with the purpose to promote cooperation, streamline the sick leave and rehabilitation process, and facilitate RTW for sick-listed patients. The function of RC’s has shown positive results by reducing sick leave within primary healthcare. However, the function has not been evaluated in terms of specialist psychiatry. This paper describes the design of a study to evaluate effects of a RC intervention on sick leave and RTW/entry in work or studies in patients with moderate to severe affective and/or moderate to severe anxiety disorders within specialist psychiatric care. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing an intervention group receiving support from a RC with a control group receiving treatment as usual (TAU). The target group is patients on sick leave, treated for affective and/or anxiety disorder, aged 25–64, with or without employment. DISCUSSION: This study gives the possibility to evaluate a RC intervention for individuals with mental disorders. If the study has promising vocational outcomes, it may be of importance for the participants in many ways, e.g. increase participation in society, provide economic benefits and improve health and wellbeing. This would be valuable for the individual as well as for the society. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered at the Clinicaltrials.gov Register Platform (ID NCT03729050) in 2 November 2018. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031909/ /pubmed/32075611 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8238-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Andersén, Åsa
Berglund, Erik
Anderzén, Ingrid
Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort rehabilitation coordinator intervention versus control in psychiatric specialist care for return to work and reduced sick leave: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075611
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-8238-3
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenasa rehabilitationcoordinatorinterventionversuscontrolinpsychiatricspecialistcareforreturntoworkandreducedsickleavestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT berglunderik rehabilitationcoordinatorinterventionversuscontrolinpsychiatricspecialistcareforreturntoworkandreducedsickleavestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT anderzeningrid rehabilitationcoordinatorinterventionversuscontrolinpsychiatricspecialistcareforreturntoworkandreducedsickleavestudyprotocolofarandomisedcontrolledtrial