Cargando…

Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial

BACKGROUND: Temporary fixation with an external fixator is used for numerous indications in orthopedic trauma surgery. It is unclear whether primary wound healing or secondary open-wound healing after removal of the external fixator should be advocated for the pin site. This study compares primary w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roth, Franz, Cagienard, Flavio, Link, Björn C., Hodel, Sandro, Lehnick, Dirk, Babst, Reto, Beeres, Frank J. P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4087-8
_version_ 1783499467467522048
author Roth, Franz
Cagienard, Flavio
Link, Björn C.
Hodel, Sandro
Lehnick, Dirk
Babst, Reto
Beeres, Frank J. P.
author_facet Roth, Franz
Cagienard, Flavio
Link, Björn C.
Hodel, Sandro
Lehnick, Dirk
Babst, Reto
Beeres, Frank J. P.
author_sort Roth, Franz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Temporary fixation with an external fixator is used for numerous indications in orthopedic trauma surgery. It is unclear whether primary wound healing or secondary open-wound healing after removal of the external fixator should be advocated for the pin site. This study compares primary wound closure with secondary wound healing for the pin site. The primary aim is to compare pin-site infection rates. The secondary aim is to compare time to wound healing and esthetic outcome. The hypothesis was that primary wound closure does not lead to more infections than secondary wound healing. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled, blinded, monocenter study based on a non-inferiority design. To obtain an equal patient population and groups, all pin-entry sites of the patients are treated alternately at the time of removal of the external fixator with primary wound closure and secondary wound healing. Patients are randomized according to whether the proximal pin-entry site is treated with wound closure or by secondary open-wound healing, from which the further sequence develops. The pre- and postoperative protocol is standardized for all pin-entry sites. A photo documentation of the pin-entry sites takes place 2 and 52 weeks postoperatively during the routine clinical follow-up visits. Further controls take place at 6, 12 and 26 weeks after pin removal. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of primary wound closure compared to secondary wound healing in terms of postoperative wound infections according to the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. The secondary outcomes are time to complete wound healing (days) and esthetical outcome (subjective preference of patients and Vancouver Scar Scale score). DISCUSSION: This study aims to answer how to deal with the pin site after removal of the external fixator. To date, no routine and generally accepted protocol exists for the management of pin sites after removal of the external fixator. This prospective, randomized controlled, blinded monocenter trial should determine whether primary wound closure or secondary wound healing should be advocated after removal of the external fixator. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03842956. Registered retrospectively on 13 February 2019.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70319112020-02-25 Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial Roth, Franz Cagienard, Flavio Link, Björn C. Hodel, Sandro Lehnick, Dirk Babst, Reto Beeres, Frank J. P. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Temporary fixation with an external fixator is used for numerous indications in orthopedic trauma surgery. It is unclear whether primary wound healing or secondary open-wound healing after removal of the external fixator should be advocated for the pin site. This study compares primary wound closure with secondary wound healing for the pin site. The primary aim is to compare pin-site infection rates. The secondary aim is to compare time to wound healing and esthetic outcome. The hypothesis was that primary wound closure does not lead to more infections than secondary wound healing. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a prospective, randomized controlled, blinded, monocenter study based on a non-inferiority design. To obtain an equal patient population and groups, all pin-entry sites of the patients are treated alternately at the time of removal of the external fixator with primary wound closure and secondary wound healing. Patients are randomized according to whether the proximal pin-entry site is treated with wound closure or by secondary open-wound healing, from which the further sequence develops. The pre- and postoperative protocol is standardized for all pin-entry sites. A photo documentation of the pin-entry sites takes place 2 and 52 weeks postoperatively during the routine clinical follow-up visits. Further controls take place at 6, 12 and 26 weeks after pin removal. The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of primary wound closure compared to secondary wound healing in terms of postoperative wound infections according to the Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definitions. The secondary outcomes are time to complete wound healing (days) and esthetical outcome (subjective preference of patients and Vancouver Scar Scale score). DISCUSSION: This study aims to answer how to deal with the pin site after removal of the external fixator. To date, no routine and generally accepted protocol exists for the management of pin sites after removal of the external fixator. This prospective, randomized controlled, blinded monocenter trial should determine whether primary wound closure or secondary wound healing should be advocated after removal of the external fixator. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03842956. Registered retrospectively on 13 February 2019. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031911/ /pubmed/32075685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4087-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Roth, Franz
Cagienard, Flavio
Link, Björn C.
Hodel, Sandro
Lehnick, Dirk
Babst, Reto
Beeres, Frank J. P.
Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title_full Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title_fullStr Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title_full_unstemmed Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title_short Primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
title_sort primary or secondary wound healing of the pin sites after removal of the external fixator: study protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled, monocenter trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-4087-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rothfranz primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT cagienardflavio primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT linkbjornc primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT hodelsandro primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT lehnickdirk primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT babstreto primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial
AT beeresfrankjp primaryorsecondarywoundhealingofthepinsitesafterremovaloftheexternalfixatorstudyprotocolforaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledmonocentertrial