Cargando…

Should we transfer poor quality embryos?

BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertili...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirillova, Anastasia, Lysenkov, Sergey, Farmakovskaya, Maria, Kiseleva, Yulia, Martazanova, Bella, Mishieva, Nona, Abubakirov, Aydar, Sukhikh, Gennady
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5
_version_ 1783499483781267456
author Kirillova, Anastasia
Lysenkov, Sergey
Farmakovskaya, Maria
Kiseleva, Yulia
Martazanova, Bella
Mishieva, Nona
Abubakirov, Aydar
Sukhikh, Gennady
author_facet Kirillova, Anastasia
Lysenkov, Sergey
Farmakovskaya, Maria
Kiseleva, Yulia
Martazanova, Bella
Mishieva, Nona
Abubakirov, Aydar
Sukhikh, Gennady
author_sort Kirillova, Anastasia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student’s t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables. RESULTS: No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively). CONCLUSION: Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70319822020-02-25 Should we transfer poor quality embryos? Kirillova, Anastasia Lysenkov, Sergey Farmakovskaya, Maria Kiseleva, Yulia Martazanova, Bella Mishieva, Nona Abubakirov, Aydar Sukhikh, Gennady Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student’s t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables. RESULTS: No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively). CONCLUSION: Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET). BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031982/ /pubmed/32099657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kirillova, Anastasia
Lysenkov, Sergey
Farmakovskaya, Maria
Kiseleva, Yulia
Martazanova, Bella
Mishieva, Nona
Abubakirov, Aydar
Sukhikh, Gennady
Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title_full Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title_fullStr Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title_full_unstemmed Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title_short Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
title_sort should we transfer poor quality embryos?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kirillovaanastasia shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT lysenkovsergey shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT farmakovskayamaria shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT kiselevayulia shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT martazanovabella shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT mishievanona shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT abubakirovaydar shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos
AT sukhikhgennady shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos