Cargando…
Should we transfer poor quality embryos?
BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertili...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5 |
_version_ | 1783499483781267456 |
---|---|
author | Kirillova, Anastasia Lysenkov, Sergey Farmakovskaya, Maria Kiseleva, Yulia Martazanova, Bella Mishieva, Nona Abubakirov, Aydar Sukhikh, Gennady |
author_facet | Kirillova, Anastasia Lysenkov, Sergey Farmakovskaya, Maria Kiseleva, Yulia Martazanova, Bella Mishieva, Nona Abubakirov, Aydar Sukhikh, Gennady |
author_sort | Kirillova, Anastasia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student’s t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables. RESULTS: No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively). CONCLUSION: Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7031982 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70319822020-02-25 Should we transfer poor quality embryos? Kirillova, Anastasia Lysenkov, Sergey Farmakovskaya, Maria Kiseleva, Yulia Martazanova, Bella Mishieva, Nona Abubakirov, Aydar Sukhikh, Gennady Fertil Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate if it is safe and effective to transfer poor quality embryos. METHODS: It was a retrospective analysis using individual patient data with positive controls. All patients undergoing embryo transfers of poor quality embryos on day 3 or on day 5 as part of fresh In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) cycles performed between 2012 and 2016. This study assessed a total of 738 poor quality embryos from 488 IVF programs. 261 embryo transfers were performed on day 3 (402 embryos were transferred) and 227 on day 5 (336 embryos were transferred). Control group consisted of 9893 fair and good quality embryos from 5994 IVF programs. Outcome rates were compared with two-tailed Fisher exact test using fisher.test function in R software. 95% confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method with binom.test function in R. The groups of patients with poor vs. good and fair quality embryos were compared by age, body mass index(BMI), number of oocytes, female and male main diagnosis, cycle type, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocol, the starting day of gonadotropin administration, the starting dose of gonadotropins, the total dose of gonadotropins, the total number of days of gonadotropins administration, the starting day of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist administration, the total number of ampoules of GnRH-agonist used, day of the trigger of ovulation administration and the type of the trigger of ovulation using the Student’s t-test for interval variables and with the chi-square test for nominal variables. RESULTS: No significant differences in the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live births, and the number of children born were found between the groups of poor quality embryos transferred on day 3 and day 5. Though the implantation rate was lower for the group of poor quality embryos, than for the control (13.9% vs 37.2%), statistically significant differences between the proportion of implanted embryos which resulted in clinical pregnancies and live births in both groups were not observed (72% vs 78.2 and 55.8% vs 62.0% respectively). CONCLUSION: Transfer of poor quality embryos at either day 3 or day 5 have a low potential for implantation, though those embryos which successfully implanted have the same potential for live birth as the embryos of fair and good quality. This study supports that it is safe to transfer poor quality embryos when they are the only option for fresh embryo transfer (ET). BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031982/ /pubmed/32099657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kirillova, Anastasia Lysenkov, Sergey Farmakovskaya, Maria Kiseleva, Yulia Martazanova, Bella Mishieva, Nona Abubakirov, Aydar Sukhikh, Gennady Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title | Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title_full | Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title_fullStr | Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title_full_unstemmed | Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title_short | Should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
title_sort | should we transfer poor quality embryos? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031982/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32099657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40738-020-00072-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirillovaanastasia shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT lysenkovsergey shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT farmakovskayamaria shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT kiselevayulia shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT martazanovabella shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT mishievanona shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT abubakirovaydar shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos AT sukhikhgennady shouldwetransferpoorqualityembryos |