Cargando…
The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6 |
_version_ | 1783499484483813376 |
---|---|
author | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. van Weert, Julia C. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. van de Pol, Marjolein H. Buurman, Bianca M. |
author_facet | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. van Weert, Julia C. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. van de Pol, Marjolein H. Buurman, Bianca M. |
author_sort | Pel-Littel, Ruth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an intervention to improve SDM in older adults with MCC. METHODS: Following the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions, the SDM(MCC) intervention was developed step-wise. Based on a literature review and empirical research in a co-creation process with end users, we developed training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older patients with MCC and informal caregivers. After assessing feasibility, the intervention was implemented in a pilot study (N = 108) in two outpatient geriatric clinics of an academic and a non-academic teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Key elements of the training for geriatricians include developing skills to involve older adults with MCC and informal caregivers in SDM and following the six-step ‘Dynamic model for SDM with frail older patients’, as well as learning how to explore personal goals related to quality of life and how to form a partnership with the patient and the informal caregiver. Key elements of the preparatory tool for patients include an explicit invitation to participate in SDM, nomination that the patient’s own knowledge is valuable, invitation to form a partnership with the geriatrician, encouragement to share information about daily and social functioning and exploration of possible goals. Furthermore, the invitation of informal caregivers to share their concerns was also a key element. CONCLUSIONS: Through a process of co-creation, both training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older adults and their informal caregivers were developed, tailored to the needs of the end users and based on the ‘Dynamic model of SDM with frail older patients’. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7031985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70319852020-02-25 The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study Pel-Littel, Ruth E. van Weert, Julia C. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. van de Pol, Marjolein H. Buurman, Bianca M. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an intervention to improve SDM in older adults with MCC. METHODS: Following the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions, the SDM(MCC) intervention was developed step-wise. Based on a literature review and empirical research in a co-creation process with end users, we developed training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older patients with MCC and informal caregivers. After assessing feasibility, the intervention was implemented in a pilot study (N = 108) in two outpatient geriatric clinics of an academic and a non-academic teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Key elements of the training for geriatricians include developing skills to involve older adults with MCC and informal caregivers in SDM and following the six-step ‘Dynamic model for SDM with frail older patients’, as well as learning how to explore personal goals related to quality of life and how to form a partnership with the patient and the informal caregiver. Key elements of the preparatory tool for patients include an explicit invitation to participate in SDM, nomination that the patient’s own knowledge is valuable, invitation to form a partnership with the geriatrician, encouragement to share information about daily and social functioning and exploration of possible goals. Furthermore, the invitation of informal caregivers to share their concerns was also a key element. CONCLUSIONS: Through a process of co-creation, both training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older adults and their informal caregivers were developed, tailored to the needs of the end users and based on the ‘Dynamic model of SDM with frail older patients’. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031985/ /pubmed/32075636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Pel-Littel, Ruth E. van Weert, Julia C. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. van de Pol, Marjolein H. Buurman, Bianca M. The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title | The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title_full | The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title_fullStr | The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title_full_unstemmed | The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title_short | The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study |
title_sort | development of the evidence-based sdm(mcc) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the dico study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pellittelruthe thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT vanweertjuliacm thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT minkmanmirellam thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT scholteopreimerwilmajm thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT vandepolmarjoleinh thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT buurmanbiancam thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT pellittelruthe developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT vanweertjuliacm developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT minkmanmirellam developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT scholteopreimerwilmajm developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT vandepolmarjoleinh developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy AT buurmanbiancam developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy |