Cargando…

The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study

BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pel-Littel, Ruth E., van Weert, Julia C. M., Minkman, Mirella M., Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M., van de Pol, Marjolein H., Buurman, Bianca M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6
_version_ 1783499484483813376
author Pel-Littel, Ruth E.
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Minkman, Mirella M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
van de Pol, Marjolein H.
Buurman, Bianca M.
author_facet Pel-Littel, Ruth E.
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Minkman, Mirella M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
van de Pol, Marjolein H.
Buurman, Bianca M.
author_sort Pel-Littel, Ruth E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an intervention to improve SDM in older adults with MCC. METHODS: Following the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions, the SDM(MCC) intervention was developed step-wise. Based on a literature review and empirical research in a co-creation process with end users, we developed training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older patients with MCC and informal caregivers. After assessing feasibility, the intervention was implemented in a pilot study (N = 108) in two outpatient geriatric clinics of an academic and a non-academic teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Key elements of the training for geriatricians include developing skills to involve older adults with MCC and informal caregivers in SDM and following the six-step ‘Dynamic model for SDM with frail older patients’, as well as learning how to explore personal goals related to quality of life and how to form a partnership with the patient and the informal caregiver. Key elements of the preparatory tool for patients include an explicit invitation to participate in SDM, nomination that the patient’s own knowledge is valuable, invitation to form a partnership with the geriatrician, encouragement to share information about daily and social functioning and exploration of possible goals. Furthermore, the invitation of informal caregivers to share their concerns was also a key element. CONCLUSIONS: Through a process of co-creation, both training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older adults and their informal caregivers were developed, tailored to the needs of the end users and based on the ‘Dynamic model of SDM with frail older patients’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7031985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70319852020-02-25 The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study Pel-Littel, Ruth E. van Weert, Julia C. M. Minkman, Mirella M. Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M. van de Pol, Marjolein H. Buurman, Bianca M. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) contributes to personalized decisions that fit the personal preferences of patients when choosing a treatment for a condition. However, older adults frequently face multiple chronic conditions (MCC). Therefore, implementing SDM requires special features. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of an intervention to improve SDM in older adults with MCC. METHODS: Following the Medical Research Council framework for developing complex interventions, the SDM(MCC) intervention was developed step-wise. Based on a literature review and empirical research in a co-creation process with end users, we developed training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older patients with MCC and informal caregivers. After assessing feasibility, the intervention was implemented in a pilot study (N = 108) in two outpatient geriatric clinics of an academic and a non-academic teaching hospital in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Key elements of the training for geriatricians include developing skills to involve older adults with MCC and informal caregivers in SDM and following the six-step ‘Dynamic model for SDM with frail older patients’, as well as learning how to explore personal goals related to quality of life and how to form a partnership with the patient and the informal caregiver. Key elements of the preparatory tool for patients include an explicit invitation to participate in SDM, nomination that the patient’s own knowledge is valuable, invitation to form a partnership with the geriatrician, encouragement to share information about daily and social functioning and exploration of possible goals. Furthermore, the invitation of informal caregivers to share their concerns was also a key element. CONCLUSIONS: Through a process of co-creation, both training for geriatricians and a preparatory tool for older adults and their informal caregivers were developed, tailored to the needs of the end users and based on the ‘Dynamic model of SDM with frail older patients’. BioMed Central 2020-02-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7031985/ /pubmed/32075636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pel-Littel, Ruth E.
van Weert, Julia C. M.
Minkman, Mirella M.
Scholte op Reimer, Wilma J. M.
van de Pol, Marjolein H.
Buurman, Bianca M.
The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title_full The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title_fullStr The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title_full_unstemmed The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title_short The development of the evidence-based SDM(MCC) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the DICO study
title_sort development of the evidence-based sdm(mcc) intervention to improve shared decision making in geriatric outpatients: the dico study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7031985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32075636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-1022-6
work_keys_str_mv AT pellittelruthe thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT vanweertjuliacm thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT minkmanmirellam thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT scholteopreimerwilmajm thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT vandepolmarjoleinh thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT buurmanbiancam thedevelopmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT pellittelruthe developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT vanweertjuliacm developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT minkmanmirellam developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT scholteopreimerwilmajm developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT vandepolmarjoleinh developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy
AT buurmanbiancam developmentoftheevidencebasedsdmmccinterventiontoimproveshareddecisionmakingingeriatricoutpatientsthedicostudy