Cargando…

Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols

This paper presents the performance of two eukaryotic genomic ribosomal regions, ITS1 and ITS2, in describing fungal diversity in aerosol samples using amplicon-based High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS). Composting sites, biomethanization facilities, and dairy farms, all affected by the presence of fun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mbareche, Hamza, Veillette, Marc, Bilodeau, Guillaume, Duchaine, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7032056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110484
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8523
_version_ 1783499494555385856
author Mbareche, Hamza
Veillette, Marc
Bilodeau, Guillaume
Duchaine, Caroline
author_facet Mbareche, Hamza
Veillette, Marc
Bilodeau, Guillaume
Duchaine, Caroline
author_sort Mbareche, Hamza
collection PubMed
description This paper presents the performance of two eukaryotic genomic ribosomal regions, ITS1 and ITS2, in describing fungal diversity in aerosol samples using amplicon-based High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS). Composting sites, biomethanization facilities, and dairy farms, all affected by the presence of fungi, were visited to collect air samples. The amplicon-based HTS approach is a target enrichment method that relies on the amplification of a specific target using particular primers before sequencing. Thus, the results are highly dependent on the quality of amplification. For this reason, the authors of this paper used a shotgun metagenomic approach to compare its outcome with the amplicon-based method. Indeed, shotgun metagenomic does not rely on any amplification prior to sequencing, because all genes are sequenced without a specific target. In addition, culture methods were added to the analyses in biomethanization and dairy farms samples to validate their contribution to fungal diversity of aerosols. The results obtained are unequivocal towards ITS1 outperformance to ITS2 in terms of richness, and taxonomic coverage. The differential abundance analysis did demonstrate that some taxa were exclusively detected only by ITS2, and vice-versa for ITS1. However, the shotgun metagenomic approach showed a taxonomic profile more resembling to ITS1 than ITS2. Based on these results, neither of the barcodes evaluated is perfect in terms of distinguishing all species. Using both barcodes offers a broader view of the fungal aerosol population. However, with the actual knowledge, the authors strongly recommend using ITS1 as a universal fungal barcode for quick general analyses of diversity and when limited financial resources are available, primarily due its ability to capture taxonomic profiles similar to those obtained using the shotgun metagenomic. The culture comparison with amplicon-based sequencing showed the complementarity of both approaches in describing the most abundant taxa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7032056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70320562020-02-27 Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols Mbareche, Hamza Veillette, Marc Bilodeau, Guillaume Duchaine, Caroline PeerJ Bioinformatics This paper presents the performance of two eukaryotic genomic ribosomal regions, ITS1 and ITS2, in describing fungal diversity in aerosol samples using amplicon-based High-Throughput Sequencing (HTS). Composting sites, biomethanization facilities, and dairy farms, all affected by the presence of fungi, were visited to collect air samples. The amplicon-based HTS approach is a target enrichment method that relies on the amplification of a specific target using particular primers before sequencing. Thus, the results are highly dependent on the quality of amplification. For this reason, the authors of this paper used a shotgun metagenomic approach to compare its outcome with the amplicon-based method. Indeed, shotgun metagenomic does not rely on any amplification prior to sequencing, because all genes are sequenced without a specific target. In addition, culture methods were added to the analyses in biomethanization and dairy farms samples to validate their contribution to fungal diversity of aerosols. The results obtained are unequivocal towards ITS1 outperformance to ITS2 in terms of richness, and taxonomic coverage. The differential abundance analysis did demonstrate that some taxa were exclusively detected only by ITS2, and vice-versa for ITS1. However, the shotgun metagenomic approach showed a taxonomic profile more resembling to ITS1 than ITS2. Based on these results, neither of the barcodes evaluated is perfect in terms of distinguishing all species. Using both barcodes offers a broader view of the fungal aerosol population. However, with the actual knowledge, the authors strongly recommend using ITS1 as a universal fungal barcode for quick general analyses of diversity and when limited financial resources are available, primarily due its ability to capture taxonomic profiles similar to those obtained using the shotgun metagenomic. The culture comparison with amplicon-based sequencing showed the complementarity of both approaches in describing the most abundant taxa. PeerJ Inc. 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7032056/ /pubmed/32110484 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8523 Text en ©2020 Mbareche et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioinformatics
Mbareche, Hamza
Veillette, Marc
Bilodeau, Guillaume
Duchaine, Caroline
Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title_full Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title_fullStr Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title_short Comparison of the performance of ITS1 and ITS2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
title_sort comparison of the performance of its1 and its2 as barcodes in amplicon-based sequencing of bioaerosols
topic Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7032056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32110484
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8523
work_keys_str_mv AT mbarechehamza comparisonoftheperformanceofits1andits2asbarcodesinampliconbasedsequencingofbioaerosols
AT veillettemarc comparisonoftheperformanceofits1andits2asbarcodesinampliconbasedsequencingofbioaerosols
AT bilodeauguillaume comparisonoftheperformanceofits1andits2asbarcodesinampliconbasedsequencingofbioaerosols
AT duchainecaroline comparisonoftheperformanceofits1andits2asbarcodesinampliconbasedsequencingofbioaerosols