Cargando…
Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review
AIMS. For the past quarter of a century, Frank et al.’s (1991) consensus-based definitions of major depressive disorder (MDD) episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence have been the paramount driving forces for consistency in MDD research as well as in clinical practice. This study aims t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7032752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000227 |
_version_ | 1783499559566049280 |
---|---|
author | de Zwart, P. L. Jeronimus, B. F. de Jonge, P. |
author_facet | de Zwart, P. L. Jeronimus, B. F. de Jonge, P. |
author_sort | de Zwart, P. L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS. For the past quarter of a century, Frank et al.’s (1991) consensus-based definitions of major depressive disorder (MDD) episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence have been the paramount driving forces for consistency in MDD research as well as in clinical practice. This study aims to review the evidence for the empirical validation of Frank et al.’s proposed concept definitions and to discuss evidence-based modifications. METHODS. A literature search of Web of Science and PubMed from 1/1/1991 to 08/30/2017 identified all publications which referenced Frank et al.’s request for definition validation. Publications with data relevant for validation were included and checked for referencing other studies providing such data. RESULTS. A total of 56 studies involving 39 315 subjects were included, mainly presenting data to validate the severity and duration thresholds for defining remission and recovery. Most studies indicated that the severity threshold for defining remission should decrease. Additionally, specific duration thresholds to separate remission from recovery did not add any predictive value to the notion that increased remission duration alleviates the risk of reoccurrence of depressive symptoms. Only limited data were available to validate the severity and duration criteria for defining a depressive episode. CONCLUSIONS. Remission can best be defined as a less symptomatic state than previously assumed (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item version (HAMD-17) ⩽4 instead of ⩽7), without applying a duration criterion. Duration thresholds to separate remission from recovery are not meaningful. The minimal duration of depressive symptoms to define a depressive episode should be longer than 2 weeks, although further studies are required to recommend an exact duration threshold. These results are relevant for researchers and clinicians aiming to use evidence-based depression outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7032752 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70327522020-05-05 Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review de Zwart, P. L. Jeronimus, B. F. de Jonge, P. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Articles AIMS. For the past quarter of a century, Frank et al.’s (1991) consensus-based definitions of major depressive disorder (MDD) episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence have been the paramount driving forces for consistency in MDD research as well as in clinical practice. This study aims to review the evidence for the empirical validation of Frank et al.’s proposed concept definitions and to discuss evidence-based modifications. METHODS. A literature search of Web of Science and PubMed from 1/1/1991 to 08/30/2017 identified all publications which referenced Frank et al.’s request for definition validation. Publications with data relevant for validation were included and checked for referencing other studies providing such data. RESULTS. A total of 56 studies involving 39 315 subjects were included, mainly presenting data to validate the severity and duration thresholds for defining remission and recovery. Most studies indicated that the severity threshold for defining remission should decrease. Additionally, specific duration thresholds to separate remission from recovery did not add any predictive value to the notion that increased remission duration alleviates the risk of reoccurrence of depressive symptoms. Only limited data were available to validate the severity and duration criteria for defining a depressive episode. CONCLUSIONS. Remission can best be defined as a less symptomatic state than previously assumed (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item version (HAMD-17) ⩽4 instead of ⩽7), without applying a duration criterion. Duration thresholds to separate remission from recovery are not meaningful. The minimal duration of depressive symptoms to define a depressive episode should be longer than 2 weeks, although further studies are required to recommend an exact duration threshold. These results are relevant for researchers and clinicians aiming to use evidence-based depression outcomes. Cambridge University Press 2018-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7032752/ /pubmed/29769159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000227 Text en © Cambridge University Press 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles de Zwart, P. L. Jeronimus, B. F. de Jonge, P. Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title | Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title_full | Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title_short | Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
title_sort | empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7032752/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29769159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796018000227 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dezwartpl empiricalevidencefordefinitionsofepisoderemissionrecoveryrelapseandrecurrenceindepressionasystematicreview AT jeronimusbf empiricalevidencefordefinitionsofepisoderemissionrecoveryrelapseandrecurrenceindepressionasystematicreview AT dejongep empiricalevidencefordefinitionsofepisoderemissionrecoveryrelapseandrecurrenceindepressionasystematicreview |