Cargando…

OM-85 BV for primary prevention of recurrent airway infections: a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of respiratory tract infections in children treated with OM-85 BV and placebo during the 3-month therapy period, and observation for a further 3 months after treatment. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 54 children (6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Souza, Fátima Cleonice, Mocellin, Magáli, Ongaratto, Renata, Leitão, Lidiane Alves de Azeredo, Friedrich, Frederico Orlando, Silveira, Victória d’A, Scotta, Marcelo Comerlato, Pitrez, Paulo Márcio, Pinto, Leonardo Araújo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7032885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32130328
http://dx.doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO5262
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of respiratory tract infections in children treated with OM-85 BV and placebo during the 3-month therapy period, and observation for a further 3 months after treatment. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted with 54 children (6 months to 5 years old) with no past history of recurrent respiratory infections attending daycare center. Family members were instructed to administer one capsule per day for 10 consecutive days, for 3 months of OM-85 BV or placebo. Telephone interviews were conducted every 30 days. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of respiratory infections between the groups. The mean number of respiratory tract infection in the OM-85 BV Group in the first 3 months was 0.92±0.87, and in the Placebo Group was 0.74±1.02, and at 6 months it was 1.62±1.47 and 1.03±1.34, respectively. CONCLUSION: OM-85 BV was not effective in the primary prevention of respiratory tract infections. Although most authors recommend the use of this immunostimulant in children with a history of recurrent respiratory infections, more studies are needed to define its usefulness in the primary prevention of respiratory infections in healthy children exposed to few risk factors.