Cargando…

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) involves the multidimensional assessment and management of an older person. It is well described in hospital and home-based settings. A novel approach could be to perform CGA within primary healthcare, the initial community located healthcare sett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garrard, James W., Cox, Natalie J., Dodds, Richard M., Roberts, Helen C., Sayer, Avan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w
_version_ 1783499586174713856
author Garrard, James W.
Cox, Natalie J.
Dodds, Richard M.
Roberts, Helen C.
Sayer, Avan A.
author_facet Garrard, James W.
Cox, Natalie J.
Dodds, Richard M.
Roberts, Helen C.
Sayer, Avan A.
author_sort Garrard, James W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) involves the multidimensional assessment and management of an older person. It is well described in hospital and home-based settings. A novel approach could be to perform CGA within primary healthcare, the initial community located healthcare setting for patients, improving accessibility to a co-located multidisciplinary team. AIM: To appraise the evidence on CGA implemented within the primary care practice. METHODS: The review followed PRISMA recommendations. Eligible studies reported CGA on persons aged ≥ 65 in a primary care practice. Studies focusing on a single condition were excluded. Searches were run in five databases; reference lists and publications were screened. Two researchers independently screened for eligibility and assessed study quality. All study outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The authors screened 9003 titles, 145 abstracts and 97 full texts. Four studies were included. Limited study bias was observed. Studies were heterogeneous in design and reported outcomes. CGAs were led by a geriatrician (n = 3) or nurse practitioner (n = 1), with varied length and extent of follow-up (12–48 months). Post-intervention hospital admission rates showed mixed results, with improved adherence to medication modifications. No improvement in survival or functional outcomes was observed. Interventions were widely accepted and potentially cost-effective. DISCUSSION: The four studies demonstrated that CGA was acceptable and provided variable outcome benefit. Further research is needed to identify the most effective strategy for implementing CGA in primary care. Particular questions include identification of patients suitable for CGA within primary care CGA, a consensus list of outcome measures, and the role of different healthcare professionals in delivering CGA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033083
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70330832020-03-06 Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review Garrard, James W. Cox, Natalie J. Dodds, Richard M. Roberts, Helen C. Sayer, Avan A. Aging Clin Exp Res Review BACKGROUND: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) involves the multidimensional assessment and management of an older person. It is well described in hospital and home-based settings. A novel approach could be to perform CGA within primary healthcare, the initial community located healthcare setting for patients, improving accessibility to a co-located multidisciplinary team. AIM: To appraise the evidence on CGA implemented within the primary care practice. METHODS: The review followed PRISMA recommendations. Eligible studies reported CGA on persons aged ≥ 65 in a primary care practice. Studies focusing on a single condition were excluded. Searches were run in five databases; reference lists and publications were screened. Two researchers independently screened for eligibility and assessed study quality. All study outcomes were reviewed. RESULTS: The authors screened 9003 titles, 145 abstracts and 97 full texts. Four studies were included. Limited study bias was observed. Studies were heterogeneous in design and reported outcomes. CGAs were led by a geriatrician (n = 3) or nurse practitioner (n = 1), with varied length and extent of follow-up (12–48 months). Post-intervention hospital admission rates showed mixed results, with improved adherence to medication modifications. No improvement in survival or functional outcomes was observed. Interventions were widely accepted and potentially cost-effective. DISCUSSION: The four studies demonstrated that CGA was acceptable and provided variable outcome benefit. Further research is needed to identify the most effective strategy for implementing CGA in primary care. Particular questions include identification of patients suitable for CGA within primary care CGA, a consensus list of outcome measures, and the role of different healthcare professionals in delivering CGA. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-04-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7033083/ /pubmed/30968287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Garrard, James W.
Cox, Natalie J.
Dodds, Richard M.
Roberts, Helen C.
Sayer, Avan A.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title_full Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title_short Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
title_sort comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033083/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30968287
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01183-w
work_keys_str_mv AT garrardjamesw comprehensivegeriatricassessmentinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT coxnataliej comprehensivegeriatricassessmentinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT doddsrichardm comprehensivegeriatricassessmentinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT robertshelenc comprehensivegeriatricassessmentinprimarycareasystematicreview
AT sayeravana comprehensivegeriatricassessmentinprimarycareasystematicreview