Cargando…

Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis

OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance, cut-off values, and optimal drive frequency range for staging hepatic fibrosis using tomoelastography by multifrequency MR elastography of the liver and spleen. METHODS: This prospective study consecutively enrolled a total of 61 subjects between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reiter, Rolf, Tzschätzsch, Heiko, Schwahofer, Florian, Haas, Matthias, Bayerl, Christian, Muche, Marion, Klatt, Dieter, Majumdar, Shreyan, Uyanik, Meltem, Hamm, Bernd, Braun, Jürgen, Sack, Ingolf, Asbach, Patrick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7
_version_ 1783499600308469760
author Reiter, Rolf
Tzschätzsch, Heiko
Schwahofer, Florian
Haas, Matthias
Bayerl, Christian
Muche, Marion
Klatt, Dieter
Majumdar, Shreyan
Uyanik, Meltem
Hamm, Bernd
Braun, Jürgen
Sack, Ingolf
Asbach, Patrick
author_facet Reiter, Rolf
Tzschätzsch, Heiko
Schwahofer, Florian
Haas, Matthias
Bayerl, Christian
Muche, Marion
Klatt, Dieter
Majumdar, Shreyan
Uyanik, Meltem
Hamm, Bernd
Braun, Jürgen
Sack, Ingolf
Asbach, Patrick
author_sort Reiter, Rolf
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance, cut-off values, and optimal drive frequency range for staging hepatic fibrosis using tomoelastography by multifrequency MR elastography of the liver and spleen. METHODS: This prospective study consecutively enrolled a total of 61 subjects between June 2014 and April 2017: 45 patients with chronic liver disease and proven stage of fibrosis and 16 healthy volunteers. Tomoelastography was performed at 1.5 T using six drive frequencies from 35 to 60 Hz. Cut-off values and AUC were calculated. Shear wave speed (in m/s) of the liver and spleen was assessed separately and in combination as a surrogate of stiffness. RESULTS: For compound multifrequency processing of the liver, cut-off and AUC values by fibrosis stage were as follows: F1, 1.52 m/s and 0.89; F2, 1.55 m/s and 0.94; F3, 1.67 m/s and 0.98; and F4, 1.72 m/s and 0.98. Diagnostic performance of the best single drive frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) was similar (mean AUC = 0.95, respectively). Combined analysis of the liver and spleen slightly improved performance at 60 Hz in F4 patients (mean AUC = 0.97 vs. 0.95, p = 0.03). Full-field-of-view elastograms displayed not only the liver and spleen but also small anatomical structures including the pancreas and major vessels. CONCLUSION: Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. Our analysis of single-frequency tomoelastography suggests that scan time can be further reduced in future studies, making tomoelastography easier to implement in clinical routine. KEY POINTS: • Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms of the abdomen with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Diagnostic performance of single-frequency tomoelastography at higher frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) and compound multifrequency processing are equivalent for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Combined assessment of hepatic and splenic stiffness slightly improves diagnostic performance for staging hepatic fibrosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7033143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-70331432020-03-06 Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis Reiter, Rolf Tzschätzsch, Heiko Schwahofer, Florian Haas, Matthias Bayerl, Christian Muche, Marion Klatt, Dieter Majumdar, Shreyan Uyanik, Meltem Hamm, Bernd Braun, Jürgen Sack, Ingolf Asbach, Patrick Eur Radiol Magnetic Resonance OBJECTIVES: To determine the diagnostic performance, cut-off values, and optimal drive frequency range for staging hepatic fibrosis using tomoelastography by multifrequency MR elastography of the liver and spleen. METHODS: This prospective study consecutively enrolled a total of 61 subjects between June 2014 and April 2017: 45 patients with chronic liver disease and proven stage of fibrosis and 16 healthy volunteers. Tomoelastography was performed at 1.5 T using six drive frequencies from 35 to 60 Hz. Cut-off values and AUC were calculated. Shear wave speed (in m/s) of the liver and spleen was assessed separately and in combination as a surrogate of stiffness. RESULTS: For compound multifrequency processing of the liver, cut-off and AUC values by fibrosis stage were as follows: F1, 1.52 m/s and 0.89; F2, 1.55 m/s and 0.94; F3, 1.67 m/s and 0.98; and F4, 1.72 m/s and 0.98. Diagnostic performance of the best single drive frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) was similar (mean AUC = 0.95, respectively). Combined analysis of the liver and spleen slightly improved performance at 60 Hz in F4 patients (mean AUC = 0.97 vs. 0.95, p = 0.03). Full-field-of-view elastograms displayed not only the liver and spleen but also small anatomical structures including the pancreas and major vessels. CONCLUSION: Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. Our analysis of single-frequency tomoelastography suggests that scan time can be further reduced in future studies, making tomoelastography easier to implement in clinical routine. KEY POINTS: • Tomoelastography provides full-field-of-view elastograms of the abdomen with unprecedented detail resolution and excellent diagnostic accuracy for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Diagnostic performance of single-frequency tomoelastography at higher frequencies (45 Hz, 55 Hz, 60 Hz) and compound multifrequency processing are equivalent for staging hepatic fibrosis. • Combined assessment of hepatic and splenic stiffness slightly improves diagnostic performance for staging hepatic fibrosis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-11-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7033143/ /pubmed/31712963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Magnetic Resonance
Reiter, Rolf
Tzschätzsch, Heiko
Schwahofer, Florian
Haas, Matthias
Bayerl, Christian
Muche, Marion
Klatt, Dieter
Majumdar, Shreyan
Uyanik, Meltem
Hamm, Bernd
Braun, Jürgen
Sack, Ingolf
Asbach, Patrick
Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title_full Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title_fullStr Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title_short Diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
title_sort diagnostic performance of tomoelastography of the liver and spleen for staging hepatic fibrosis
topic Magnetic Resonance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31712963
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06471-7
work_keys_str_mv AT reiterrolf diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT tzschatzschheiko diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT schwahoferflorian diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT haasmatthias diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT bayerlchristian diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT muchemarion diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT klattdieter diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT majumdarshreyan diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT uyanikmeltem diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT hammbernd diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT braunjurgen diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT sackingolf diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis
AT asbachpatrick diagnosticperformanceoftomoelastographyoftheliverandspleenforstaginghepaticfibrosis