Cargando…
Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control?
The self-domestication hypothesis suggests that, like mammalian domesticates, humans have gone through a process of selection against aggression – a process that in the case of humans was self-induced. Here, we extend previous proposals and suggest that what underlies human social evolution is selec...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00134 |
_version_ | 1783499675228176384 |
---|---|
author | Shilton, Dor Breski, Mati Dor, Daniel Jablonka, Eva |
author_facet | Shilton, Dor Breski, Mati Dor, Daniel Jablonka, Eva |
author_sort | Shilton, Dor |
collection | PubMed |
description | The self-domestication hypothesis suggests that, like mammalian domesticates, humans have gone through a process of selection against aggression – a process that in the case of humans was self-induced. Here, we extend previous proposals and suggest that what underlies human social evolution is selection for socially mediated emotional control and plasticity. In the first part of the paper we highlight general features of human social evolution, which, we argue, is more similar to that of other social mammals than to that of mammalian domesticates and is therefore incompatible with the notion of human self-domestication. In the second part, we discuss the unique aspects of human evolution and propose that emotional control and social motivation in humans evolved during two major, partially overlapping stages. The first stage, which followed the emergence of mimetic communication, the beginnings of musical engagement, and mimesis-related cognition, required socially mediated emotional plasticity and was accompanied by new social emotions. The second stage followed the emergence of language, when individuals began to instruct the imagination of their interlocutors, and to rely even more extensively on emotional plasticity and culturally learned emotional control. This account further illustrates the significant differences between humans and domesticates, thus challenging the notion of human self-domestication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7033472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-70334722020-02-28 Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? Shilton, Dor Breski, Mati Dor, Daniel Jablonka, Eva Front Psychol Psychology The self-domestication hypothesis suggests that, like mammalian domesticates, humans have gone through a process of selection against aggression – a process that in the case of humans was self-induced. Here, we extend previous proposals and suggest that what underlies human social evolution is selection for socially mediated emotional control and plasticity. In the first part of the paper we highlight general features of human social evolution, which, we argue, is more similar to that of other social mammals than to that of mammalian domesticates and is therefore incompatible with the notion of human self-domestication. In the second part, we discuss the unique aspects of human evolution and propose that emotional control and social motivation in humans evolved during two major, partially overlapping stages. The first stage, which followed the emergence of mimetic communication, the beginnings of musical engagement, and mimesis-related cognition, required socially mediated emotional plasticity and was accompanied by new social emotions. The second stage followed the emergence of language, when individuals began to instruct the imagination of their interlocutors, and to rely even more extensively on emotional plasticity and culturally learned emotional control. This account further illustrates the significant differences between humans and domesticates, thus challenging the notion of human self-domestication. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7033472/ /pubmed/32116937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00134 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shilton, Breski, Dor and Jablonka. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Shilton, Dor Breski, Mati Dor, Daniel Jablonka, Eva Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title | Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title_full | Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title_fullStr | Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title_full_unstemmed | Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title_short | Human Social Evolution: Self-Domestication or Self-Control? |
title_sort | human social evolution: self-domestication or self-control? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7033472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32116937 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00134 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shiltondor humansocialevolutionselfdomesticationorselfcontrol AT breskimati humansocialevolutionselfdomesticationorselfcontrol AT dordaniel humansocialevolutionselfdomesticationorselfcontrol AT jablonkaeva humansocialevolutionselfdomesticationorselfcontrol |